It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: JamesChessman
Cone karst landscape is quite breathtaking, in particular in Guangxi and also in the Chocolate Hills in the Philippines.
There are no pyramids under them, however, except in myths. Myths are not true. You might want to look up "karst" to understand what it is and the water erosion both above and below the ground forms that spectacular landscape.
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: JamesChessman
I don't really understand if they are talking about the content of the Vedas or Hindu history. Also, I don't think that the Mahabharata, the Ramayana, and the Puranas are part of the Vedas, they are more recent.
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: JamesChessman
We have only that person's interpretation of what the texts say, and even that is not that convincing, specially that part that says that the weapon could be stopped with "a stick".
I'll try to find what the texts really say (translated to English, as I can't read Sanskrit).
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: JamesChessman
You should learn a little about geology.
originally posted by: JamesChessman
No, there's the entire traditional culture which believes in the ancient advanced civilizations and aliens living in ancient India. Including many modern day people believing in that.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: JamesChessman
No, there's the entire traditional culture which believes in the ancient advanced civilizations and aliens living in ancient India. Including many modern day people believing in that.
Does the tradition talk about nuclear war or is it a modern interpretation? And Aliens? Does the tradition say there were people from other planets?
PS: one thing I noticed during my searches is that it looks like people in India are trying to make their civilization as older as they can, without much care for real evidences.
originally posted by: JamesChessman
Sure, especially the part of geology that teaches that seemingly obvious buried pyramids, can't be pyramids.
I think you guys should reflect that such mountains don't typically get dug into or researched, AFAIK, nobody really looks if they are buried pyramids or not.
And if Egypt had a wetter climate, then their pristine preserved pyramids, would presumably accumulate soil and grow trees, just the same. For people to then argue that they are natural structures.
originally posted by: JamesChessman
Nuclear war, I linked the webpage already, it talks about world-ending weapons and such.
PS: one thing I noticed during my searches is that it looks like people in India are trying to make their civilization as older as they can, without much care for real evidences.
That's your main problem, you give too much importance to the way things look and too little to their composition.
The one with the big hole in the video has access to the inside, no need to dig into it, and they were researching it, why do you ignore the opinions stated in the video?
But they would still be made from blocks of limestone instead of natural limestone intrusions.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: JamesChessman
Nuclear war, I linked the webpage already, it talks about world-ending weapons and such.
Again, that's that person's opinion, I was asking if tradition talks about nuclear war, not about some person on the Internet.
In ancient Sanskrit writings, the Brahmastra (Sanskrit: ब्रह्मास्त्र ) was a weapon created by Brahma.
It is sometimes known as the Brahma Astra (Astra means ‘weapon’). As described in a number of the Hindu Puranas ( Mythology ), it was considered the deadliest weapon.
It was said that when the Brahmastra was discharged, there was neither a counter attack nor a defense that could stop it, exce pt by Brahmadanda, a stick also created by Brahma.
The Brahmastra never missed its mark and had to be used with very specific intent against an individual enemy or army, as the target would face complete annihilation.
It was believed to be obtained by meditating on the Creator in the Vedas, Lord Brahma; it could only be used once in a lifetime. The user would have to display immense mental concentration.
The weapon was also believed to cause severe environmental damage. The land where the weapon was used became barren and all life in and around that area ceased to exist, as both women and men became infertile. There was also a severe decrease in rainfall with the land developing cracks, like in a drought.
originally posted by: Dalamax
From reading your post we can contend that if the events described in the vedas aligns with a significant earth event then the happenings recorded may have been how it went down.
I would suggest some of the thunderbolts project material to you for some imagination fodder.
Presents a brief run down about the who, why and how of the thunder bolts project.
a reply to: JamesChessman
originally posted by: JamesChessman
Well I'd love for researchers to dig up the mountains and reveal the buried pyramids, but there's practically no research ever being done, like this.
originally posted by: JamesChessman
But that's the deal with composition, nobody ever seems to be actually looking at the composition of these seemingly obvious buried pyramids.
I was speaking in general terms, there seems generally almost no research into the composition of buried pyramid-looking mountains.
And neither is the featured video, they focused on plants growing in the mouths of caves, and a blind shrimp. This is not evaluating the composition of the mountain, nor is it exploring the caves, beyond the very beginning of the caves, from what I've seen.
In the hypothetical that Egypt had a wet climate, I fully expect that the famous pyramids would be covered in soil, growing trees, and nobody would inspect very closely, and most people would assume they were natural mountains. i.e. They would not be evaluating the blocks of limestone in the first place.