China: Ancient Pyramids + Explosions: "Underground Forests in Mystery Holes of Guangxi"

I didn't plan this out at all, but I am excited that I just published a new video RESPONSE to this crazy documentary here: "The Underground Forests in Mystery Holes of Guangxi," which was published by "Our World."

To be crystal clear, I have nothing to do with this video, but I'm embedding because then, I have some responses to this wild documentary vid:





To me, the MOST interesting aspect is that the mountains are convincing that they're ancient pyramids, FROM A LOST, ADVANCED CIVILIZATION... just buried in the sands of time, quite literally. (That is, the pyramids became buried under thousands of years of wind blowing sediment and soil, over them, to the point that they almost look like natural mountains, covered in grass and trees!)

But the mountains show their artificiality, in their sizes and shapes, being WAY TOO CONSISTENT, for natural mountains. Rather, it indicates that underneath the soil layer, the fundamental shapes are extremely consistent artificial pyramids.

We can see these principles in Egypt: It's probably easy to overlook the fact that the world's most famous, and best-preserved pyramids, are IN A CLUSTER of pyramids, with consistent angles & sizes:



I think these mountains in China... are basically the same as Egypt's famous pyramid cluster. Underneath it all:



Apparently it just comes down to CLIMATE, whether such ancient pyramids are preserved perfectly in the dry desert (Egypt), whereas in MOST PLACES, the same structures will apparently accumulate sediment and soil, and grow greenery over it.

I think that's why Egypt's pyramids seem so unique, it's just because the desert preserves it, best in the world.

I think there are probably DOZENS of other equivalent pyramids, all around the world, but they're hiding under sediment layers and grass / trees. So that they are mostly regarded as natural formations.








The "Underground Forests" in the title, is really nothing. There are caves with plants growing near the opening, because it receives some sunlight. So it's a fantastic wilderness landscape, that would be amazing to explore.

But it's not really a big deal that there is such plant growth, in cave openings. It's not really "underground," and it's not really doing anything different from any other NORMAL plants and trees in nature.





The "Mystery Holes" are interesting though, because apparently they really are a mystery, re: how / why they formed like that. (Obviously people can make-up different natural excuses for these "mystery holes," but the fact is, that these holes are strange and mysterious, even just in nature.)




The doc shows two main "mystery holes" and let's acknowledge what they look like:
First, we see what looks like... an ancient, EXPLODED pyramid.

It obviously resembles a bomb's impact crater, even after thousands of years' sediment and plant growth over it. The SIDES of the "mountain" show sections that appear straight and angular, probably, underneath the soil layers. It's the twisted, angular sides of a blown-up pyramid.




Hmmmm... Well, uploads have stopped working for me, in the middle of creating this post, haha. So I wanted to embed a pic of that described mountain, looking like an exploded pyramid.

I emphasized it in my video, including pointing out that there are several caves, inside the exploded bomb crater. This means that the caves are probably just the tunnels and passageways, originally built inside the pyramid, which we are now seeing, inside the crater.




And then there's the "mystery hole" in the image I already posted. Looks like another impact site of an ancient weapon of mass destruction. But here, instead of blowing up, it seems a hot ball just melted right through the stone pyramid. It's a smooth hole, even with vertical streaks of where the rock was melted.

PLUS, the heat bomb... seemed to expose a gigantic tunnel system of caves, probably built within the network of pyramids. The hole seems to fall into blackness of never-ending depth. The network of tunnels might run through the entire world, and we humans would never even notice it.

(Given the huge size of these tunnels, I'm inclined to think that they're passageways meant for flying ships.)






*Sorry that the uploads broke for me, or else I would have posted more pictures.
And later, if uploads starts working for me again, I will post the remaining 2 or 3 photos that I was trying to.

Finally, if anyone is interested to see / hear my video, it has THE SAME information that I just explained:

a reply to: JamesChessman
I haven't seen the video yet, so I can't comment on it. This looks like a very interesting post, so I'm going to savor it.

Good find I have been interested in the Chinese pyramids for years especially at how they are trying to hide them by planting trees on them and how they have rivers of mercury in them ?

will watch now

originally posted by: stelth2
a reply to: JamesChessman
I haven't seen the video yet, so I can't comment on it. This looks like a very interesting post, so I'm going to savor it.

Thanks homie.




Just to clarify something:
My first embedded vid is the ORIGINAL documentary, which I posted as the source content... but it's 47 minutes long, and I wasn't telling people to watch that whole thing, lol.




My own video is only FIVE MINUTES long, and I covered... the one most-interesting topic: The mountains resembling ancient pyramids, with ancient weapon damage, and an exposed subterranean network of caves.

a reply to: JamesChessman

I love the topic and the premise. I watched all the videos. However, I’m not seeing anything in them, that doesn’t look like natural geological formations.

On a side note, I was hoping for a little people (cosmic trickster) story to come out of the massive underground caverns.

S & F for an interesting perspective. 🍻

By the way, something pretty random and funny is that, when attempting to upload earlier versions of my video, I kept getting copyright claims (for the footage that I used, from the documentary).

At first, it seemed that I must have just used TOO MUCH of the original footage, so I decreased it, and chopped it down.

Afterwards, I kept getting claims, and eventually I realized that it was a specific bit of footage, that was the problem. Banned for world-wide viewership.

Specifically it's just some specific recording of that blind shrimp, which is absolutely banned from any fair-use. Well OK fine, I just cut out that specific footage, and my vid became fine.

It's absurd though, because there was nothing particularly interesting about the specific banned footage of that shrimp. It was basically stock-footage of the creature, and completely separate from the specific banned bits, there is still plenty of fair-use footage that I could still use, no problem. In fact, my vid still has the best video clips of the thing.

The banned bits were far more blurry and unclear, and I still was able to use the best footage of the creature.






...I don't really know why exactly it works out this way, though. It seems that the banned footage is linked to some DIFFERENT documentary, i.e. not the same exact YouTube video from "Our World."

So I don't know, maybe it was a TV show documentary or something like that. And it secured some exclusive use of some specific footage of a blind shrimp...?!

...I can't decide why exactly it would work out like this, haha.

a reply to: JamesChessman

In today's world any modern city will build skyscrapers that all pretty much have the same basic structures.
Maybe long long ago there was another global society similar to ours today and pyramids were their preferred why of building cities?

I think the guy in the documentary described its origin quite good, with the underground river and the rocks about falling down and being carried away combined with the tectonic uplift activity.

There are no traces of intelligent construction or death beams from space in the documentary.

a reply to: JamesChessman

Great thread in the spirit of old ATS.

a reply to: JamesChessman

I'm going with giant ancient sinkholes or even lava tubes that collapsed in areas and flora and fauna took over

But I like how u think

Interesting topic, but probably belongs in "ancient & lost civilizations"?

originally posted by: EnhancedInterrogator
Interesting topic, but probably belongs in "ancient & lost civilizations"?

Haha yeah I was considering that. But I think a new thread can only be in one sub-forum... and I decided Aliens because it implies such impossible advanced technology, thousands of yrs ago, that it seems to imply aliens: Ancient pyramids, subterranean cave systems to fly ships through, and at least two impact-sites from bombs dropped on pyramids!

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: JamesChessman

I love the topic and the premise. I watched all the videos. However, I’m not seeing anything in them, that doesn’t look like natural geological formations.

that's a pattern with him. he imagines things that don't exist, then "accidentally, without planning" creates a BS youtube video about it, then promotes it on ATS.

his previous threads are just like that, the last one about supposed buildings on the moon (actually compression artefacts) went on for months and was a true pain in the ass, because he ignores facts while throwing all the sh.t possible at those that disagree with him.

not sure about you, but i'll just delta the f..k out of here, it's a waste of time.

a reply to: JamesChessman

First of all, China does have real pyramids and hills that look like pyramids, so when talking about "pyramids in China" we could be talking about any of those.

But the mountains show their artificiality, in their sizes and shapes, being WAY TOO CONSISTENT, for natural mountains.

No, they do not show any artificiality.

Apparently it just comes down to CLIMATE, whether such ancient pyramids are preserved perfectly in the dry desert (Egypt), whereas in MOST PLACES, the same structures will apparently accumulate sediment and soil, and grow greenery over it.

Some of the Egyptian pyramids were under sand and uncovered when found. Probably some are yet to be found.

The Central American pyramids, having been built in a completely different climate, got covered in vegetation, so we do have examples of what happens in those cases, like in the photo below.



Now, if we look at the "pyramids" in the video we can see that some start on top of others, like hills do. Although possible, I have never seen a building starting on top of another.

Another thing about the "pyramids" in the video: erosion. Wind and rain would remove (or not allow) enough soil to build on the top of a pyramid (you can see that the top of the Central American pyramids is visible), so the top should have less vegetation than the rest of "pyramid", but we do not see that.

What we see on the holes is that they look like sinkholes and that the sides show the rock, which looks like limestone or similar. Limestone is known to allow the creation of sinkholes because it's easy to be chemically affected, so it kind of "melts" into nothing, resulting also in those formations inside the caverns.

Nothing in the images from China shows signs or artificiality, at least to someone that knows a little about geology.

originally posted by: JamesChessman
It's absurd though, because there was nothing particularly interesting about the specific banned footage of that shrimp. It was basically stock-footage of the creature, and completely separate from the specific banned bits, there is still plenty of fair-use footage that I could still use, no problem. In fact, my vid still has the best video clips of the thing.

Being stock-footage is probably the reason it is not allowed, as it was sold for use in the original video and you do not have a licence to use it.

a reply to: ArMaP

First of all, China does have real pyramids and hills that look like pyramids, so when talking about "pyramids in China" we could be talking about any of those.

Sure, I agree.

I just made a response to the one documentary focused on the mountains with "underground forests" and "mystery holes" in Guangxi, China.

No, they do not show any artificiality.

Well, suit yourself, I think the shapes' consistency suggests artificiality. Plus the exploded pyramid shape, and the gaping-hole both looking like ancient weapons impact sites. And the bottomless pit suggests a gigantic network of subterranean caves and tunnels.

Some of the Egyptian pyramids were under sand and uncovered when found. Probably some are yet to be found.

^Right, but my point was that they don't accumulate damp soil and eventually grow grass and trees, which seems to be the normal outcome in most places.

The Central American pyramids, having been built in a completely different climate, got covered in vegetation, so we do have examples of what happens in those cases, like in the photo below.

There are probably MORE examples of buried temples than you realize.

They don't all look like this image you posted:


Rather, many buried pyramids just REMAIN buried, and then become considered as nature.

Here's the buried temple known as the LARGEST temple in the world. In Puebla, Mexico.

The hill is the buried pyramid.

IIRC everybody completely forgot that there was a pyramid inside the hill, for like 1,500 years.

It was some land-renovation that revealed the underlying pyramid, and now the church owns the entire area, and won't let the temple be excavated:


scienceloversss.blogspot.com...

Anyway my point really is that it's easy for an ancient structure to become buried and remain buried, and become considered a natural formation. The Puebla pyramid is a great example of that.

Now, if we look at the "pyramids" in the video we can see that some start on top of others, like hills do. Although possible, I have never seen a building starting on top of another.

The whole idea is that there's thousands of years of soil accumulated / piled over it. The dirt will spill over the different shapes.

Another thing about the "pyramids" in the video: erosion. Wind and rain would remove (or not allow) enough soil to build on the top of a pyramid (you can see that the top of the Central American pyramids is visible), so the top should have less vegetation than the rest of "pyramid", but we do not see that.

No, not really how it works. There's such a thing as buried temples / pyramids / structures which actually DO remain buried, I think Puebla, MX is possibly the best example.

So no, we can't just imagine that we know about how erosion would keep the top of a pyramid clear. We don't know that, and there are plenty examples of actual buried stuff that remains buried.

It's not rocket-science either, thousands of years' accumulation forms layers of soil, it grows plants and trees.

Nothing in the images from China shows signs or artificiality, at least to someone that knows a little about geology.

Did you actually know about the Puebla, MX hill / buried temple? It seems to contradict your assumptions about geology, erosion, and your imagination that the tops of buried pyramids are going to be bald rock...



^No, the natural processes did not keep the upper parts clear of soil and vegetation.

The revealed parts are only from human excavation, in modern times.

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: JamesChessman
It's absurd though, because there was nothing particularly interesting about the specific banned footage of that shrimp. It was basically stock-footage of the creature, and completely separate from the specific banned bits, there is still plenty of fair-use footage that I could still use, no problem. In fact, my vid still has the best video clips of the thing.

Being stock-footage is probably the reason it is not allowed, as it was sold for use in the original video and you do not have a licence to use it.

Right, I know, my point is that it's absurd to have exclusive rights to a few seconds of LAME video (of that shrimp), while the BEST footage is still fair-use.

Plus it's strange that the exclusive footage is claimed by a DIFFERENT documentary, not the actual doc on YT which is also using that exclusive footage.

a reply to: JamesChessman

that first crater in the video at 0;30 seconds looks to me like an overgrown caldera of an extinct volcano with collapsed lava tubes making the caves, really cool .

People think anything remotely pyramid shaped is a buried pyramid

schiehallion mountain in scotland has pyramid like features but its a natural mountain formation

originally posted by: JamesChessman
Rather, many buried pyramids just REMAIN buried, and then become considered as nature.

Here's the buried temple known as the LARGEST temple in the world. In Puebla, Mexico.

The hill is the buried pyramid.

Do we know how the site looked when the Spanish built the church?

The whole idea is that there's thousands of years of soil accumulated / piled over it. The dirt will spill over the different shapes.

It only works like that if you are pouring soil over the pyramids, soil accumulated through natural processes will not cover the buildings like it was some kind of icing sugar frosting on a cake.

Look at the image below and you will see that the "pyramids" are superimposed over each other. The one I marked in red would have to be almost half inside the one behind it, while the one in yellow would need to have a big part of it inside the one on the left.

No, not really how it works. There's such a thing as buried temples / pyramids / structures which actually DO remain buried, I think Puebla, MX is possibly the best example.

It is how it works, as there's a big difference between the "pyramids" in the video and the Mexico temple, and that's the angle of their sides.
In the same way roofs of the houses in places where it snows have more vertical sides to avoid the snow to accumulate on them, more vertical slopes like the ones on the video do not accumulate dust that easily, and have a stronger tendency of having it removed by wind and rain.

So no, we can't just imagine that we know about how erosion would keep the top of a pyramid clear. We don't know that, and there are plenty examples of actual buried stuff that remains buried.

But you can imagine an extra-terrestrial intervention in building supposed pyramids, with some being partially destroyed by some unknown method...

It's not rocket-science either, thousands of years' accumulation forms layers of soil, it grows plants and trees.

It's geology, and some people study it.

Did you actually know about the Puebla, MX hill / buried temple? It seems to contradict your assumptions about geology, erosion, and your imagination that the tops of buried pyramids are going to be bald rock...

No, I didn't know about that specific case, and it doesn't contradict my assumptions, as the shape is different, we would need the same shape, preferably on an area with the same climate.

I see you didn't comment on the part about the composition of the "pyramids"...

PS: why the aggressive tone in your response?

a reply to: JamesChessman

I once got a copyright claim against a NASA video I posted on YouTube, as some company said the video was taken from a DVD from them. They wanted to have publicity to be presented along with my video.

In reality I had taken the video from a NASA site.

In this case, the documentary you posted probably used video from a different documentary with their permission. As you did not have the permission you cannot use it, even if you just posted it as part of the other documentary.