-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions ---SHALL WE PLAY A GAME ONCE MORE?--- -Part- --41--

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: FlyingFox

DOJ Announcement

Monitors will include personnel from the Civil Rights Division and from U.S. Attorneys’ Offices. In addition, the division also deploys monitors from the Office of Personnel Management, where authorized by federal court order. Division personnel will also maintain contact with state and local election officials.

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: FlyingFox

I would feel better about this if it wasn't Biden's DoJ.

Here's what I have...

Two Q drops and I don't know what the @#$% you mooks are going on about.

Fix this @#$%

Pronto

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Ektar
Yes, the point of the pics was to show that coming out of her garage flanked by security is common for her.

Police escort is different than security escort. I am wondering now, when I didn't see what the others were saying. Thanks for helping me see something that maybe you are not. I see squad cars. We need to know if that is the way she rolls? If she has sooo much protection that she probably should have, I wonder why Paul had this incident that got us looking. None of this passes the smell or the eye test for me. Not because I am looking for it, but who has 4 days in a row of coming out of the garage with a squad car as an escort? Does that happen everyday, and how can we prove it one way or another I wonder? Add in the day she seemed to be escorted out with cuffs on around Jan 6 incident?

originally posted by: RookQueen
a reply to: Caled
So you think we are going to see them with or without the glasses?

The demons? If it is the day of reckoning and that is happening the glasses will be unnecessary IMO. That is only about our eyes and the "others" physical self being in the wavelength range that our eyes can see. The paranormal researchers seem to find some things that I am considering here. It might be best to not see any of that. Easier to overcome fear if it is just our imagination than if it was something tangible coming right at you like a freight train running late.

originally posted by: Justoneman
I see squad cars.

There are no other cars in the video posted in the tweet that mentioned her not having been seen since that day, although she had actually been seen since then, so it is a moot point.

Does that happen everyday, and how can we prove it one way or another I wonder?

Personally I don't feel there is a need to prove it one way or the other.

Add in the day she seemed to be escorted out with cuffs on around Jan 6 incident?

Where are you going with that? She is being repeatedly arrested? That doesn't make any sense.

twitter.com...

a reply to: Justoneman

No. Bad. Bad JoM. No.

It's a trap

🪤

Really good questions, they actually matter,if it's out of the norm then it's worth checking out.
Would she be completely flanked by Secret service agents or would there be assistance from local law enforcement?
Word is she turned a while back and is fully cooperating .
We shall see !
Today is a BIG DAY,HUGE. Watching the eclipse right now.







a reply to: Justoneman

a reply to: dashen

1) Good steer, will see how ghidra can apply - just need to get couple hours of IRL stuff outta the way first! Didn't Elon Musk say he was going to make Twitter code open source - If anyone can locate a copy of that, or it's object module, then we can apply ghidra to it (and look particularly for comment lines first).


I'd also say that our toolbox of DECODE METHODS can be applied.


2) Meanwhile, if anyone has the time, it's worth cross checking the lines that I said had appeared inpost #4959 as these joins between posts often give new insights!
(The lines are bolded on my posting of #4959 decodes; a few pages back.)


3) Some of you may remember that I spent a long time trying to fit Q posts into a 2x2 grid; with little result.

Now there's an opportunity to throw the posts into a TETRAHEDRAL PYRAMID SHAPE and see what that throws up.

Makes a lot of sense because each line of posts from the base to the apex would all finish at the same place = therefore building an alternative to the Qclock.

This one may take a week or so to automate - not easy but worth a try!

The results of the mid-terms will be very telling for me. The Q story seems to be that white hats intervened enough in 2016 to save the presidential election, but did not intervene in 2020 and allowed all the fraud in order to reveal the globalist agenda.

So what does that say about these elections? Surely the last two years have revealed everything there is to reveal about the globalists. The latest Q post says "White hats have secured many systems, but problems still remain." What does this mean?

If we have fair (or even close to fair) elections, the Democrats will be routed, though many of the Republicans are still globalists, unfortunately. But if we have enough election fraud again, we accelerate down the current path by once again delivering the legislative branch to the Democrats.

Q tells us to "vote." But if there is enough fraud, voting is pointless. Look what happened in Brazil.

If these elections are stolen, will it be enough to finally get Americans to wake up and do something? Is that the point?

originally posted by: NR03T5rchY
The latest Q post says "White hats have secured many systems, but problems still remain." What does this mean?

I'd say Q is doing what they accuse others of doing "getting out in front of the story".

Voting machine problems in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Color me surprised. Quote from NBC news:

"We're trying to fix this problem as quickly as possible," Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Chairman Bill Gates said in a video shared on Twitter.

Cheers

originally posted by: dashen
Two Q drops and I don't know what the @#$% you mooks are going on about.

Fix this @#$%

Pronto

Thank-you! I didn't know the reason for this thread was back posting again!

But yep...here he is: qalerts.app...

a reply to: NR03T5rchY

They have no choice but to put the pedal to the metal and race as fast as they can to steal this election at all costs.
They go to jail either way.

National Guard deployed.
They are screwed.
But steal it they will, in any way they can, and have left.
They must count on all the support in media and social media.
Twitter was the tipping point.

They are screwed.




But I am 100% certain something is about to happen in just a few places that once unwrapped will require the entire election to be suspect everywhere requiring the SC.

Perp walks today but only low level.
Lots of wailing and gnashing of teeth for sure.
Twitter will be lit up like fireworks on the 4th of July (preplandemic).

Where is Zuckerberg in this?

Today will be visual to set the narrative.

Something that suspends the results is sure to happen!!!

But no way can this be 2020 again.
No way!!!



Tomorrow there is only one topic in all the world.

a reply to: dashen

Did they get quoted in the thread?

#4959 Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 000000 No.17724555 📁
Nov 6 2022 11:18:56 (EST)
What groups are financing Ukraine?
Why are they financing Ukraine?
Why was Hunter in Ukraine?
What did 'Pop' threaten to withold from Ukraine?
A billion dollars?
Who benefits?
What did 'Pop' receive in return?
Why is Hunter not in jail?
Think.
Blackmail?
Bribes?
Extortion?
Threats?
How do you control a 'leader'?
How do you control a country?
Are you ready to take back control?
Your vote matters.
You have all the tools you need.
Q

#4960 Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 000000 No.17728969 📁
Nov 7 2022 19:20:19 (EST) NEW
Why do some elections take more than a day to count?
Can cheating be done after the polls are closed?
Who controls the pollbooks?
Who controls the databases?
Who controls the elections?
Why are extra ballots printed?
If someone doesn't vote, can bad actors hijack their vote?
How?
Why did the National Guard activate cybersecurity teams?
Who gave the order to 'activate' the cybersecurity teams?
Why?
To protect the elections?
To claim the midterms are 'safe'?
Safe from what?
Setting the stage?
Watch carefully.
White hats have secured many systems, but problems still remain.
You have all the tools you need.
Vote.
Q

Cheers

a reply to: NR03T5rchY

The latest Q post says "White hats have secured many systems, but problems still remain." What does this mean?

I'd say it's problems such as this:

I'm just getting ready to vote and something is different on the USPS ballot envelope this year.
On the back it states. "This may not be your only ballot. Other elections may be held by other political subdivisions by mail or by polling place. Why wait? Return your ballot today". [Their bold]
Considering many people here use drop boxes that means that whatever this "other" ballot is they are not getting to vote on it.
In 2020 the back of the envelope stated "Back Voter's Choice Act. You chose when and where and how to vote."

Of course if you mess up when voting in person the Polling Station has lots of extra ballots. What happens to the left overs?

I will be checking into something. "Both a Spanish language sample ballot and in-person Spanish language ballot are available at our Voter Service and Polling Centers". I wonder how many of these sample ballots are at the centers and what happens after the election to them? Are they worded exactly the same way?

The drop boxes are an issue as well. During the last election these boxes were brimming and there was no visible oversite at all. Maybe this year there will be eyes on.
Considering the huge number of people who have moved here there will be more provisional ballots. Much more, which could lead to 10 days of darkness while this huge number of ballots are verified. Biden has been hinting at a delay in calling the election.
----
On a side note during the Presidential election of 2020 I knew of a number of people who had moved here from another state. They received ballots from their home state as well as here. I inquired at the election office about this. The response was a shrug and it was up to the voter to notify their home state to remove them from the voter roles. Lots of extra ballots floating around.
Happy Voting Day!

originally posted by: pheonix358

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: FlyingFox

Could Joe Biden really be a Vincent Gigante type of character?

There is and has been for a long while, an Actor playing Joe.

You are watching a movie.

The fat lady hasn't sung yet. Soon!

P

One of the many things I don’t understand…

If JB and a handful of other important leaders are being impersonated by actors, people in masks, deepfake videos or whatever…

And we can see evidence of that, some of it reasonably plausible…

Then competent people in intelligence agencies, other government officials, inquisitive reporters, both foreign and domestic, some of which may be unfriendly, should be able to see it too.

And yet no one of significance, friend or foe, is calling it out, making an issue of it. No one is asking what the heck is going on. None of the parties with vastly different agendas, even outright enemies, find it in their interest to say anything.

Sure, many people could be pressured or controlled to keep their mouth shut, but not everyone.

I’m thinking of that saying, “The only way two people can keep a secret is if one of them is dead.”
Yet this secret seems to be pretty well kept, worldwide, at least at levels above conspiracy forum chatter.

If it’s true, why is everyone playing along?

Or is the evidence fabricated, and we the ones getting played?
.

There are four types of people:

1) people who know (so few you wouldn't believe it)
2) people who see and believe but don't know (very small percentage of the population)
3) people who see but don't believe (small percentage of the population)
4) people who don't see or choose not to see (large percentage of the population)

Group 1 is sworn to secrecy and/or will be silenced if they speak before the end of the show. Group 2 speaks up, but nobody in Groups 3 or 4 believes them. Group 3 isn't opened-minded enough to believe. And Group 4 is your typical member of society.

originally posted by: cimmerius

originally posted by: pheonix358

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: FlyingFox

Could Joe Biden really be a Vincent Gigante type of character?

There is and has been for a long while, an Actor playing Joe.

You are watching a movie.

The fat lady hasn't sung yet. Soon!

P

One of the many things I don’t understand…

If JB and a handful of other important leaders are being impersonated by actors, people in masks, deepfake videos or whatever…

And we can see evidence of that, some of it reasonably plausible…

Then competent people in intelligence agencies, other government officials, inquisitive reporters, both foreign and domestic, some of which may be unfriendly, should be able to see it too.

And yet no one of significance, friend or foe, is calling it out, making an issue of it. No one is asking what the heck is going on. None of the parties with vastly different agendas, even outright enemies, find it in their interest to say anything.

Sure, many people could be pressured or controlled to keep their mouth shut, but not everyone.

I’m thinking of that saying, “The only way two people can keep a secret is if one of them is dead.”
Yet this secret seems to be pretty well kept, worldwide, at least at levels above conspiracy forum chatter.

If it’s true, why is everyone playing along?

Or is the evidence fabricated, and we the ones getting played?
.