Supreme Court Draft Decision Would Strike Down Roe v. Wade

Just to be clear, are democrats finally admitting that there are men and women?

I can't keep up with this stuff.

I've been busy.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IAMTAT

IDK, i hear fertilizer is getting expensive.

Planted Parenthood!
I like the concept.

Heiresy!

Hmmm...selling murdered old people's hair.
Not bad.
I wonder if the Chinese have already beaten us to that idea.

a reply to: JinMI

bit of a tangent there Bud.

You're for forcing the birth of human being but don't want any of the consequence of that birth. is that right?
Either you're willing to step-up and be responsible or you're not.
You want the human born, you take care of the human until they are old enough to look after themselves.

a reply to: puzzled2

bit of a tangent there Bud.

Na, just reacting in kind to your bait filled question.

You're for forcing the birth of human being but don't want any of the consequence of that birth. is that right?

Back up. How and why did the pregancy happen in the first place and what part did I play?

Either you're willing to step-up and be responsible or you're not.

YES!!!!!!! You get it! Where we disagree i think that when a party is not willing, the one innocent life is murdered to accomodate for those two who didnt step up. Thats cool with you?

You want the human born, you take care of the human until they are old enough to look after themselves.

How about, dont want little humans? Dont engage in intercourse and if you do, make damn sure you take precautions.

I dont think abortion is good contraception practice

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: IAMTAT

IDK, i hear fertilizer is getting expensive.

Planted Parenthood!
I like the concept.

Heiresy!

Hmmm...selling murdered old people's hair.
Not bad.
I wonder if the Chinese have already beaten us to that idea.

Yep, its the Chinese fault for my compost heaps.

a reply to: puzzled2

Wait? Another poster attempting to utilize an economic argument to justify murder?

Was there a convention or something?

It used to be that in the 60's and 70's, pro-abortionists made the argument that women were horribly scarred and subjugated as a consequence of a society unforgiving of pregnancies out of wedlock. They also rationally argued that these 'pregnant women' (a pre-'birthing person' archaic term, but I digress) would be forever economically disadvantaged as a consequence of having no bread-winning husband (unclear what the current status of that term is) or a means of support in the face of a profoundly discriminatory work environment.

Now that both of these things have been largely resolved (no one bats an eye at single motherhood and women have certainly largely attained parity with men in the workplace), the rationale now seems to have shifted.

Amazing transformation.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
I wonder if the Chinese have already beaten us to that idea.

13-ton shipment of human hair, likely from Chinese prisoners, seized

Check.

a reply to: loam

Now that both of these things have been largely resolved

Thanks to Roe V Wade and Griswald V Connecticut.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

So now that the issue is being relegated to the states, you think women will be ridiculed for having children out of wedlock and booted out of the workplace?

originally posted by: loam
I had no expectation you'd be an honest broker in this conversation or that I might change your mind anyway.

I'm not being honest? I've been totally forthright with all my answers. Yours was, "Well, we'll do some things".

No details, no plan, no specifics, just empty platitudes. You're not a problem solver, you're a problem creator.

a reply to: 3000Hard

What would it take for you to mind your own medical visits, households, and bedrooms?

I do. I also post my opinions and observations on a social platform called "AboveTopSecret" (or ATS for short).

Just like you do.

It really must suck to have to defend your views on life. I would apologize for disturbing your little self-absorbed delusions, but... I really am not one bit sorry. Hell, I'd bet good money I'll do it again on a different issue.

Abortion does not have to be part of your reality.

Assuming this opinion becomes the actual decision, you'll be correct (at least in Alabama). Otherwise, yes it does.

Wanton killing of children because they might be inconvenient does affect me. I am a part of this society. I get to expound on legal matters as I see fit. Live with it; I ain't going away.

TheRedneck

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Yawn.

originally posted by: JinMI
What id like to see is anything, everything to be more of an option, that includes prophylactics, IUDs, even visectomies as a solution over abortion.

That's all an option at the moment and you still have thousands upon thousands of unwanted children. You'll have even more when abortion becomes illegal. Who raises them? Who loves them? Who teaches them empathy and compassion? Sure as **** none of you.

The other poster is too gutless to answer those questions because it frankly exposes them to the reality of what comes after an unwanted child is brought into the world.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
And a good percentage of them will be hard to place, special needs babies.

Nah, they'll all turn out just fine because we'll think of things.

originally posted by: loam
Yawn.

Yup.

You're inability to answer questions is probably tiring for you. I know you know the answers, you just don't have the balls to post them.

Who raises those kids? The state, that's who. Who instills values in them (if any)? The state, that's who.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: JinMI
What id like to see is anything, everything to be more of an option, that includes prophylactics, IUDs, even visectomies as a solution over abortion.

That's all an option at the moment and you still have thousands upon thousands of unwanted children. You'll have even more when abortion becomes illegal. Who raises them? Who loves them? Who teaches them empathy and compassion? Sure as **** none of you.

The other poster is too gutless to answer those questions because it frankly exposes them to the reality of what comes after an unwanted child is brought into the world.

And the best option to those issues is murdering babies. Violating their human rights to ease the burden of people whove made bad choices.

Maybe im crazy but that doesnt sound like the best of plans.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

We'll just kill them all because we can't think of things.

originally posted by: JinMI
And the best option to those issues is murdering babies.

The majority of abortions take place in the first trimester, it isn't a baby.

I noticed that you also didn't answer the questions.

originally posted by: loam
We'll just kill them all because we can't think of things.

I know you can't think of things, that's why you intentionally speak in very vague generalities which you intersperse with your outrage.

Who takes care of them? Try giving an actual answer.

a reply to: JinMI

Violating their human rights

That is the crux of the issue, when is a group of cells a ..............human.

This i'm afraid people will never agree on.
Oddly though, a lot of other countries do not have the same issues with this as we do, funny that.