Confidential Leaked Pfizer Side Effects List Is Horrific

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

There are *always* side effects associated with any medication or drug introduced into the body, the question is what the percentage of that risk is.

According to the document in the op, those percentages of adverse reaction/side effects are extremely low (0.05%-2.0%, give or take a few tenths), with most seemingly below 1%.

As with anything, there is a risk.

Hell, the percentage of the US population with peanut allergy is estimated 1.1%, which would fall in the median of the Pfizer vaccine adverse effects.

So, nice doom porn.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

You missed out tidal waves, volcanic eruptions, and meteor impacts.



This is clearly just a list of ailments recorded in VAERS that happened to coincide with vaccination. It provides no inference or mechanism of action that implicates the vaccines as anything more than incidental.

For instance, suggesting that the the vaccines cause psycho-surgery (Amygdalohippocampectomy), or birth-defect chromosome disorders (1p36 deletion syndrome), and other infectious diseases (herpes of all types), is a bit of a stretch.



We are literally made out of RNA coded proteins and hormones. The vaccines only differ in the sequence of the RNA they carry.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

We need to know how many of each symptom/reaction has been recorded thus far, and how long into the future of a vaccinated person can the symptom/reaction occur?

I want to scare the daylights out of those who keep telling me, I got all my shots and I'm just fine. So is everyone I know!

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

No, but for example how you reacted to that new member that dared to point out a HUGE red flag in your thread and you just went nuclear and accused the member of just trying to discredit you. That's probably what bothers UpThenDown, me and probably a few others.

Before you call me a disinfo shill:
I had to get the jab and I did not want to, so call me "anti vaxx" if you need that label. I got side effects, just as expected from my medical history but that did not bother anyone or politicians that make the laws.

So here we stand, pointing out discrepancies in your thread but you stick the fingers in your ears and go "lalalal disinfo shill". It's important for the cause to be able to back stuff up and be 100% serious about it.

You just posted "evidence" that is none and when it is pointed out you go into defense instead of acknowledging the discrepancy, looking into it etc. That's how you signal others like me to just ignore your word in future.

originally posted by: frogs453
3 in and all good over here. Much rather that. No family members or coworkers have collapsed, suddenly developed cancer or VAIDS.

There's this lady on Twitter @QTWIQ1. Very anti Vax. When she had covid late December said it's no worse than a cold. 3 days later hospital. No word for 2 months. Now she's tweeting they removed her trach and she's going to learn to walk again, after being on a vent for 2 months. Yeah I prefer the Vax rather than lifelong effects, having to relearn to walk and I'm sure a monsterous hospital bill from a "cold".

She's happy her immune system got her through, not one kind word for the medical personnel that saved her life.

I know most people that had covid were just fine after couple of days of rest in bed.

I prefer the Vax rather than lifelong effects

Knowing the drug markers and their history....

a reply to: frogs453

I didn't get the shots and I'm fine, no symptoms, no death from the COOF.

a reply to: frogs453

Like I said you don't know #e, when a doctor flat out refuses to give a treatment to a dying person is forced to give the treatment the patient recovers enough to leave the ICU - is again refused the treatment in recovery ends back in ICU. the Court rules again the patient gets the treatment and leaves the ICU leaves the hospital and survives. What of that?

There is a long way to go in the investigation of this pandemic of misinformation and mistreatment.

a reply to: ARM1968

You posting something of value for a change would be nice.

Rather than just more childish insults?

I can I say I told you soo From the health subcommittee in congress

The Shots Do Not Prevent Transmission | Increased All-Cause Mortality in the Jabbed

Dr. Ryan Cole: "These vaccines do not prevent acquisition of the disease... does prevent transmission of the disease, does not prevent illness from the disease, and does not prevent death from the disease."

www.redvoicemedia.com...

a reply to: frogs453

I've had people in my family, both vaxxed and not, who got COVID. The worst was my beer drinking cousin who let himself get severely dehydrated and needed to be rehydrated at the hospital. Other than that, no side effect issues, no COVID issues.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I have a vaxxed person at work who is getitng sick all the time and generally feeling rotten. But then again there are others who got both vaxxes and the worst they had was either a second Covid case or just a bad reaction to the shots. Pfizer seems to be the one that mad epeople the most sick and had the least effect against Covid. Moderna and Johnson and Johnson seemed least harmful.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

You missed out tidal waves, volcanic eruptions, and meteor impacts.

This is clearly just a list of ailments recorded in VAERS that happened to coincide with vaccination. It provides no inference or mechanism of action that implicates the vaccines as anything more than incidental.

For instance, suggesting that the the vaccines cause psycho-surgery (Amygdalohippocampectomy), or birth-defect chromosome disorders (1p36 deletion syndrome), and other infectious diseases (herpes of all types), is a bit of a stretch.

We are literally made out of RNA coded proteins and hormones. The vaccines only differ in the sequence of the RNA they carry.

Yes, I'm sure all 2 million vaers reports are made up. So much so that in the first 55,000 pages of Pfizer documents, Pfizer recommends them as an accurate source to track adverse events. That's because they know it only reports a fraction of the events.

So pick one, if you trust Pfizer you trust vaers by extension.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

You missed out tidal waves, volcanic eruptions, and meteor impacts.

This is clearly just a list of ailments recorded in VAERS that happened to coincide with vaccination. It provides no inference or mechanism of action that implicates the vaccines as anything more than incidental.

For instance, suggesting that the the vaccines cause psycho-surgery (Amygdalohippocampectomy), or birth-defect chromosome disorders (1p36 deletion syndrome), and other infectious diseases (herpes of all types), is a bit of a stretch.

We are literally made out of RNA coded proteins and hormones. The vaccines only differ in the sequence of the RNA they carry.

Yes, I'm sure all 2 million vaers reports are made up. So much so that in the first 55,000 pages of Pfizer documents, Pfizer recommends them as an accurate source to track adverse events. That's because they know it only reports a fraction of the events.

So pick one, if you trust Pfizer you trust vaers by extension.

10.66 billion doses administered but only 2 million adverse events? That's an adverse event to dosage ratio of 0.0188 %.

If VAERS only reports a fraction of the events, by what value is it under-reporting? What reports more accurately? Surely you have some real evidential data to back up your opinion? A guess is hardly good enough.

I can only go by the best data available to us. What are you going by?

originally posted by: marg6043
I can I say I told you soo From the health subcommittee in congress

The Shots Do Not Prevent Transmission | Increased All-Cause Mortality in the Jabbed

Dr. Ryan Cole: "These vaccines do not prevent acquisition of the disease... does prevent transmission of the disease, does not prevent illness from the disease, and does not prevent death from the disease."

www.redvoicemedia.com...

While the vaccines don't absolutely prevent these things, like some sort of magic shield, they do reduce the duration of transmission and also reduce the duration of, severity of, and number of deaths per infection from, the disease.

a reply to: chr0naut

Curious you count all the shots in the world but only count 1 country's record of adverse effects.

So are you bias spreading misinformation or just trying to hide from the truth ?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

You missed out tidal waves, volcanic eruptions, and meteor impacts.

This is clearly just a list of ailments recorded in VAERS that happened to coincide with vaccination. It provides no inference or mechanism of action that implicates the vaccines as anything more than incidental.

For instance, suggesting that the the vaccines cause psycho-surgery (Amygdalohippocampectomy), or birth-defect chromosome disorders (1p36 deletion syndrome), and other infectious diseases (herpes of all types), is a bit of a stretch.

We are literally made out of RNA coded proteins and hormones. The vaccines only differ in the sequence of the RNA they carry.

Yes, I'm sure all 2 million vaers reports are made up. So much so that in the first 55,000 pages of Pfizer documents, Pfizer recommends them as an accurate source to track adverse events. That's because they know it only reports a fraction of the events.

So pick one, if you trust Pfizer you trust vaers by extension.

10.66 billion doses administered but only 2 million adverse events? That's an adverse event to dosage ratio of 0.0188 %.

If VAERS only reports a fraction of the events, by what value is it under-reporting? What reports more accurately? Surely you have some real evidential data to back up your opinion? A guess is hardly good enough.

I can only go by the best data available to us. What are you going by?

Wow, 10 billion doses given out on the US? That's pretty crazy. Did you get your 100th booster yet?


You didn't know it was underreported? Wow haven't been doing your homework. A bunch of people estimated the under reporting factor to be close to 40 for VAERs. That's in the US. How many doses were given in the US? Divide by 80 million.

Best data? You mean all the data the CDC holds back so we don't misinterpret it?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Watch how the tabloid liberal media helped with the scaremongering of the cold virus Covid, telling everyday in the news that if you will not get the jab you were going to die, but when it comes with the horrible side effects is nothing but crickets.

This why covid became soo bad, due to the deception and lies of the media, in order to help pharma make money.

covid would have come and go on its own without a full of horrific side effects jab.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

You missed out tidal waves, volcanic eruptions, and meteor impacts.

This is clearly just a list of ailments recorded in VAERS that happened to coincide with vaccination. It provides no inference or mechanism of action that implicates the vaccines as anything more than incidental.

For instance, suggesting that the the vaccines cause psycho-surgery (Amygdalohippocampectomy), or birth-defect chromosome disorders (1p36 deletion syndrome), and other infectious diseases (herpes of all types), is a bit of a stretch.

We are literally made out of RNA coded proteins and hormones. The vaccines only differ in the sequence of the RNA they carry.

Yes, I'm sure all 2 million vaers reports are made up. So much so that in the first 55,000 pages of Pfizer documents, Pfizer recommends them as an accurate source to track adverse events. That's because they know it only reports a fraction of the events.

So pick one, if you trust Pfizer you trust vaers by extension.

10.66 billion doses administered but only 2 million adverse events? That's an adverse event to dosage ratio of 0.0188 %.

If VAERS only reports a fraction of the events, by what value is it under-reporting? What reports more accurately? Surely you have some real evidential data to back up your opinion? A guess is hardly good enough.

I can only go by the best data available to us. What are you going by?

Wow, 10 billion doses given out on the US? That's pretty crazy. Did you get your 100th booster yet?

You didn't know it was underreported? Wow haven't been doing your homework. A bunch of people estimated the under reporting factor to be close to 40 for VAERs. That's in the US. How many doses were given in the US? Divide by 80 million.

Best data? You mean all the data the CDC holds back so we don't misinterpret it?

Yes, you are right. VARES is predominantly a US database.

So, I decided to get current data.

According to the Johns Hopkins site, 554,557,725 doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered in the US.

COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU)

So I went into CDC Wonder and did a query on VARES for all symptoms of death or serious threat to life, for all COVID-19 vaccines. Surprisingly, there were only 363,756 such events. When I filtered for deaths only, I got 68,697 events.

This is significantly fewer than the '2 million' VARES events you stated in your previous posts. So, I wondered where the '2 million' came from. Diving back into CDC Wonder, I did a query on ALL events related to COVID-19 vaccines. I got 5,624,121 events, so I suspect the 2 million number was likely someone who didn't know how to use CDC Wonder, and it was old data, as well.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

Anyway, 68,697 deaths registered in VAERS, divided by 554,557,725 doses of vaccine gives a dose mortality ratio of 0.012 % in the US.

And 363,756 life threatening or fatal events, divided by 554,557,725 doses of vaccine gives a serious adverse event to dosage ratio of 0.066 % in the US.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Watch how the tabloid liberal media helped with the scaremongering of the cold virus Covid, telling everyday in the news that if you will not get the jab you were going to die, but when it comes with the horrible side effects is nothing but crickets.

This why covid became soo bad, due to the deception and lies of the media, in order to help pharma make money.

covid would have come and go on its own without a full of horrific side effects jab.

Worldwide, 6 million people have died, attributed to COVID-19, and 967,000 of those deaths have been in the US.

Tabloid liberal media scaremongering did that?

originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: chr0naut

Curious you count all the shots in the world but only count 1 country's record of adverse effects.

So are you bias spreading misinformation or just trying to hide from the truth ?

I made a mistake in using a predominantly US adverse effects database and comparing it to world vaccine data. I have remedied that in this later post, which still supports my argument.