It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You know the guy in that popular Project Looking Glass video, the one who claimed he was a Navy Seal that Kerry Cassidy interviewed?
His name is not Bill Wood, his real name is William Brockbrader, he lied about being a Navy Seal and he is wanted by U.S. Marshals for failing to register as a sex offender.
originally posted by: duncanhidao
Amazing. They are literally opening the door for you to drop all the information as evidence in a court of law.
Meet Michael Tuffin, aka Michael Baxter, the guy who writes all the articles on Real Raw News. He told Politico "It's a satire site, exposing the insanity of rabid Trumpists (who lack the mental wherewithal to distinguish fact from fiction)". He's a leftist POS, funded by George Soros, who used to write a lot of crazy stuff for niburutruth.net and hosts another site called twistedtruth.net that's even worse than RRN.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Dropping this as an audit trail record, from History of the Office of the Illinois Attorney General
The Office of Attorney General first came into existence at the admission of the State of Illinois to the Union on December 3, 1818.
...so 42yrs after Independence...
The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows:
" * * *
* * * 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly chosen to his office, and to compel his restoration when illegally ousted. 7th. By information in chancery, to enforce trusts, and to prevent public nuisances, and the abuse of trust powers. 8th. By proceedings in rem, to recover property to which the crown may be entitled, by forfeiture for treason, and property, for which there is no other legal owner, such as wrecks, treasure trove, &c. (3 Black. Com., 256-7, 260 to 266; id., 427 and 428; 4 id., 308, 312.) 9th. And in certain cases, by information in chancery, for the protection of the rights of lunatics, and others, who are under the protection of the crown. (Mitford's Pl., 24-30, Adams' Equity, 301-2.)
The rider used to explain it away, outside of the formal documentation:
While many of these powers now have a statutory basis, the significance of the common law powers still must be understood from the perspective of the interests represented. Representation of the Crown is translated in our system to representation of the People thus, serving the public interest is established as the paramount obligation of the Attorney General.
Apparently, most AGs had the same on their websites but have now removed crown references.
Saturday's Star: "We are not amused" #BBCPapers #TomorrowsPapersToday bbc.in...
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: duncanhidao
Amazing. They are literally opening the door for you to drop all the information as evidence in a court of law.
That was what people were saying 4 years ago. It didn't happen then, what would be the difference now?
YOUNGER THAN EVER!!!🥳🥳🥳 t.co...
Obama's 2,500-gallon scheme suggests he wants his 6,900-square-foot, seven-bedroom house to be ready for many weeks of energy independence at a time.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: duncanhidao
Amazing. They are literally opening the door for you to drop all the information as evidence in a court of law.
That was what people were saying 4 years ago. It didn't happen then, what would be the difference now?
originally posted by: Justoneman
Many of us feel it is Tribunals or bust now.
originally posted by: duncanhidao
Leaked Audio From 80 Internal TikTok Meetings Shows That US User Data Has Been Repeatedly Accessed From China