-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions ---NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING--- -Part- --F0R7Y--

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: Thoughtful1
a reply to: Caled

I so agree with you. Really hypocritical behavior, especially considering what they have put us all through. There does not appear to be any self reflection at all.

I am starting to see more and more of the triple jabbed people coming down with some really serious medical issues. Young women with fertility issues, sudden blindness and like you say Bell's Palsy which prior to this I didn't even realize existed.
The weird part is that they all claim that they are glad they got the third jab and the part I don't understand is that they don't seem to make any connection at all to the jab and their sudden medical condition.

To be fair to them, it isn't really hypocritical (which really isn't a thing btw) because they made the choice rooted in abject fear.

They chose the jab from fear and nothing but fear, and those who choose from fear are not rational by definition. Frankly, those who chose from fear but rationalized it are even worse then those who just followed the herd, as they quite literally let fear do all the decision making but pretended it was science that did, "I'm not doing this out of fear, but because..."

I said this at the outset, this exact thing would happen. The fearful, those who ran to get jabbed, would start to make less and less sense to those who did not. The two choices are wholly incompatible, period, there is no two ways about it. We're seeing that now.

There are ramifications from choices. If one has not reached the level of consciousness to see even that rather big as the sun detail, then of course running to get jabbed without even reading the "disclaimers" is going to lead to what we are seeing. There is no do-over here. Sad, but true.

Fear is the elites aphrodisiac apparently. People who used "feels" and actually acted out of fear for themselves or a loved one have fallen into the trap Ben Franklin was warning them to not make choices on freedoms and rights out of fear or no rights and freedoms would exist at all!
Please, pardon the lousy drug on sentence with no punctuation.

Cavv, I skimmed past a telegram post, the other day, of someone doing a recent interview with Thomas Wictor on youtube?

Wish I could remember which account it was on!

originally posted by: tallcool1
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Oh yeah - I forgot Elenochie posting those in these very threads! I wonder why they're not in here any more? If there was a reason, I forgot that too.

Rel - I certainly don't mean any disrespect toward you at all, but the "be careful who you follow" posts seem to be making my point - that these "Q" people who are trying to make $$$ are not to be trusted. Especially Q1343's "profit vehicle", "destroy through [misinformation]", etc... unless I misinterpreted those posts.

PERHAPS it is as much about someone pushing my buttons about snake oil salesmen trying to sell me something I don't need and the Black hats are forcing that one on the web site?

I am sure many people in the White hat world need financial aide. The deal is not good for us if we send money for the simple reason it is the charlatans who would take it 90% of the time and we can't tell who is who and whom we can trust among them. That they need advertisement money seems logical, but for it to be like a snake oil situation makes me go meh and I quit reading all their posts and responses from the peanut gallery.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Well son of a gun Dask are you paying attention? Proofs are not 100% per prediction but they are 100% true when we have one.

I have some thoughts about what we are seeing with these accounts/posts selling coins and crypto...if I were using those accounts for comms, and I knew for a fact the people looking at them knew it was a legitimate account, I would very likely do things to delegitimize the account and scare people off.

The one account I feel is least trustworthy is Didulo. Some of her posts advocated violence in a way that I found unacceptable.

It might be an "if you know, you know" situation with some of these accounts.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: tallcool1
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Oh yeah - I forgot Elenochie posting those in these very threads! I wonder why they're not in here any more? If there was a reason, I forgot that too.

Rel - I certainly don't mean any disrespect toward you at all, but the "be careful who you follow" posts seem to be making my point - that these "Q" people who are trying to make $$$ are not to be trusted. Especially Q1343's "profit vehicle", "destroy through [misinformation]", etc... unless I misinterpreted those posts.

PERHAPS it is as much about someone pushing my buttons about snake oil salesmen trying to sell me something I don't need and the Black hats are forcing that one on the web site?

I am sure many people in the White hat world need financial aide. The deal is not good for us if we send money for the simple reason it is the charlatans who would take it 90% of the time and we can't tell who is who and whom we can trust among them. That they need advertisement money seems logical, but for it to be like a snake oil situation makes me go meh and I quit reading all their posts and responses from the peanut gallery.

originally posted by: FlyingFox

Up a whopping 8.6% in May alone.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: tallcool1

From my point of view, discounting a person totally because you've rationalised not to trust the sales pitches, is swinging the pendulum to the other extreme by deciding to reject any of their inputs as a result. I.E. losing trust in the person, rather than focussing only on their proven specialism.


I take the position of trusting them in their expertise areas but not placing any weighting on their inputs in other unproven areas.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

Folks can only give "information" based on their POV, and then, often, based on the information they see and there is just too much right now. People bitch about Whip, but they fail to see what he was doing,,,,,,,,, from HIS POV. He was trying to inform folks about the Reset and it's connection to Crypto, Evergrande, Treasury etc. Whip is also very wrong about Medbeds and what not, because he hasn't got the POV to understand them, at least what he thinks they are, but I don't judge that as anything other than not there yet. He's just a guy.

Rel and Cranky - I suppose you're both right and I stand corrected. I know that the actual legal process takes quite a while when it's done correctly - as Barr (I believe) reminded us recently. I guess I just get so impatient when these traitors are selling Americans out for their own profit, and it seems so obvious even if their supporters are so blindly indoctrinated to believe them instead of their own eyes and ears, and then people that I am hoping are letting us in on "behind the scene" details are selling obvious crap coins...
Perhaps tonight I'll go home, make myself an old fashioned, unplug from the conspiracies and media for the night and breathe. Maybe I'll watch The Man From Earth again and veg out. Thinks seem terrible, but we'll be just fine.
We're expecting lot's of rain in the greater Seattle-Tacoma area this weekend and, even at 57 years old - I still love the simple pleasure of standing outside like an idiot in a heavy spring rain shower and looking straight up at the sky and just getting drenched! Thank you guys! You 2 are both in my top most respected posters on this website.

a reply to: Justoneman

J1M - that's really what I was trying to say too - especially regarding these Trump coins/cards that are going to give you thousands of $$$ per month, etc.! But after Rel and Cranky's well worded replies, I can see their point. Not that I am going to fully trust anyone on the internet, but I won't completely discount them either. There's still some good nuggets out there from these people and as Cranky pointed out - they may only have insight into bits and pieces of info and obviously not the whole picture.

a reply to: Justoneman

The link works great just choose the FREE low speed download.
Ideal for pdf files that require 1 min to download.





Since it is too difficult I will use mega from now

Link Mega.nz

I've been following Kim for several years but she has never convinced me.
But sometimes she says interesting things
Just to be clear


The Team Bubba

qalerts.app...

Going mobile for the eve... but things seem to be happening... Ethereum has dropped through it's yearly low of $1713 to $1682.

Gossip from my anon UK hairdresser: military customers admitting things close without saying what... just smiling in response to his questions.

Another sleepless night had me spinning the Muskinator tweet around a bit.

It wasn't me that pointed out that Q team responds to the thread. It was Midnightimpact. Almost 4 years to the date in fact.


So we know the Musk account is now WH run, because there is zero chance his inflammatory posts would pass the Business Affairs Shareholder Rules. The account is also replying to way too many odd tweets to be one guy, in one place, just scrolling,,, and running the largest DOD contracting company etc.



When we started this I mentioned this Q thing goes against all things me: I hate puzzles, politics and groups. I've adapted to enjoying the group(s) aspect, still hate politics and while marginally better at puzzles I still suck.

I think the key here is the separated line and the :01 timestamp difference, but I'm not sure what I'm missing.

Curiously the line is from Shakespear not Shakespeare which is Francis B+++, which, the Gematria for Shakespeares The Tempest "King James Bible" is included. Searched 589 And Francis B has both bible code and Bacon Code as part of his folklore, as well as possibly being, or being connected to, the elusive St. G, G, who was also possibly affiliated with The Constitution.



So if it is a reply, as always, and if not, as my friend MBSC once said "I don't even know who I am anymore."

a reply to: carewemust

Care, the Dems have more pressing issues. We can classify this in the ATS Believe it or Not Section...

Abortions...what to do, what to do?

So if Roe vs Wade is really overturned as expected the Blue states have come up with a plan. They are opening abortion clinics near airports and borders. Anything to promote the local economy. Some providers are even planning on purchasing apartment buildings and operating them as abortion Airbnbs.

Staffing shortage? No problem. Effective July 1st nurse-midwives, nurse practioners and physician assistants can perform abortions. Just expand the pool of eligible providers which is what they did with the Covid jab providers.

originally posted by: tallcool1

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: tallcool1

From my point of view, discounting a person totally because you've rationalised not to trust the sales pitches, is swinging the pendulum to the other extreme by deciding to reject any of their inputs as a result. I.E. losing trust in the person, rather than focussing only on their proven specialism.


I take the position of trusting them in their expertise areas but not placing any weighting on their inputs in other unproven areas.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

Folks can only give "information" based on their POV, and then, often, based on the information they see and there is just too much right now. People bitch about Whip, but they fail to see what he was doing,,,,,,,,, from HIS POV. He was trying to inform folks about the Reset and it's connection to Crypto, Evergrande, Treasury etc. Whip is also very wrong about Medbeds and what not, because he hasn't got the POV to understand them, at least what he thinks they are, but I don't judge that as anything other than not there yet. He's just a guy.

Rel and Cranky - I suppose you're both right and I stand corrected.

I know that the actual legal process takes quite a while when it's done correctly - as Barr (I believe) reminded us recently. I guess I just get so impatient when these traitors are selling Americans out for their own profit, and it seems so obvious even if their supporters are so blindly indoctrinated to believe them instead of their own eyes and ears, and then people that I am hoping are letting us in on "behind the scene" details are selling obvious crap coins...
Perhaps tonight I'll go home, make myself an old fashioned, unplug from the conspiracies and media for the night and breathe. Maybe I'll watch The Man From Earth again and veg out. Thinks seem terrible, but we'll be just fine.
We're expecting lot's of rain in the greater Seattle-Tacoma area this weekend and, even at 57 years old - I still love the simple pleasure of standing outside like an idiot in a heavy spring rain shower and looking straight up at the sky and just getting drenched! Thank you guys! You 2 are both in my top most respected posters on this website.

TC, you reveal something to me. Many of the "impatient" folks are folks with either a super strong moral center, or former military folks who took the Oath (or both). It would seem the Oath has a very powerful impact. I know the Oath is enough to remove one from the "suspected terrorist" list with the Feds, all others must or can prove they are not,,,, by taking the Oath (complicated to explain).

My point here is when one takes the Oath it seems to continue to hold a strong resonance that quite strong in comparison to the average pewblick person.

Now if we extrapolate a bit, QArmy, Anons, Digital Soldiers, surely brings out the Military Team Oath Commitment energy within. So it stands to reason those invested want to "take the hill" "liberate the city" and accomplish the goal. Now that I think about it, it could be why so many soldiers, including Flynn, were the leaders among the Anons at the beginning. It also sucks because at least when you "take the hill" you can move on to the next project. The Swamp is, to say the least, a mess of epic proportions, where the end might not be so cut and dry.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Cranky,

You are correct about the power of the Oath. For those who it took the Oath earnestly, it is for life.

Interestingly, when one is discharged from the military, one is not formally released from the obligations of the Oath.

Cheers

That survey can't be trusted. First, trust no one. Second, the numbers add up to 101%, so with rounding errors they only got one vote, they didn't get to provide a ranked list. Then the wording can't be trusted because you can be concerned about gun violence, but not gun control, nor would being concerned about gun control tell you if you are pro or anti-gun control. This is just another way they can mess with your head. Plus, if there is one thing I learned from South Park, at least one in four people in the US is retarded, so the margin of error in that survey is at least 25%.

originally posted by: Thoughtful1
a reply to: carewemust

Care, the Dems have more pressing issues. We can classify this in the ATS Believe it or Not Section...

Abortions...what to do, what to do?

So if Roe vs Wade is really overturned as expected the Blue states have come up with a plan. They are opening abortion clinics near airports and borders. Anything to promote the local economy. Some providers are even planning on purchasing apartment buildings and operating them as abortion Airbnbs.

Staffing shortage? No problem. Effective July 1st nurse-midwives, nurse practioners and physician assistants can perform abortions. Just expand the pool of eligible providers which is what they did with the Covid jab providers.

In a statement released yesterday, the Pentagon admits there are 46 biolabs in Ukraine as part of a project to rid the world of "weapons of mass destruction."

War is Peace logic. We have to build the weapons labs to end the weapons labs, and we must put them right next to Russia, because something something.

Will always be one of the greatest marriages of pop music to the moving image. RIP Julee Cruise.


twitter.com...


twitter.com...

Are we still watching the wives?

in.mashable.com...

"Another Depp Vs Heard Case? Brad Pitt Sues Angelina Jolie For Selling Her Stake In Their Co-owned Vineyard
Do we have another Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard case in the making?"

a reply to: Justoneman
You know I don't buy into the old number crunching for proof decode style.

(pending) is rather vague and one must look to see what the court was dealing with at the time to see if there was a reason to mention full time security.

For example they got it earlier this year with the opinion draft was leaked.
US Supreme Court Justices to Get Around-the-Clock Home Security

Of course, this was also dab smack in the middle of the Kavanaugh hearings.