It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: Smigg
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Smigg
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Smigg
In the US, 17,000 would be considered fringe. There are about 10,000-15,000 actual white supremist and nobody is seriously claiming that we should listen to them.
Your analogies are terrible, people tent to ignore made up groups like white supremist that can't be proven or shown to exist. An experimental gene therapy drug on the other hand that does actually exist and is killing people, people tent to take notice of that because they can see it for themselves, it's not white supremacy hear say made up by the MSM it's actually real.
You do know that mRNA doesn't change your genetic makeup, right, and that you have approximately a 0.0018 percent of being killed by the vax?
Did the MSM instil that belief in you ?
I think they paid it. It is always coming out with some garbage concerning conjob-19 and the jab that it knows nothing about. All I can say really is don't feed the trolls, they keep coming back for more.
Like my son says, "if you argue with idiots, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" (at being an idiot). I try to avoid arguing with these trolls, because they just eat energy that can be put to better use elsewhere.
Cheers - Dave
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Smigg
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Smigg
In the US, 17,000 would be considered fringe. There are about 10,000-15,000 actual white supremist and nobody is seriously claiming that we should listen to them.
Your analogies are terrible, people tent to ignore made up groups like white supremist that can't be proven or shown to exist. An experimental gene therapy drug on the other hand that does actually exist and is killing people, people tent to take notice of that because they can see it for themselves, it's not white supremacy hear say made up by the MSM it's actually real.
You do know that mRNA doesn't change your genetic makeup, right, and that you have approximately a 0.0018 percent of being killed by the vax?
originally posted by: Bearack
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Smigg
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Smigg
In the US, 17,000 would be considered fringe. There are about 10,000-15,000 actual white supremist and nobody is seriously claiming that we should listen to them.
Your analogies are terrible, people tent to ignore made up groups like white supremist that can't be proven or shown to exist. An experimental gene therapy drug on the other hand that does actually exist and is killing people, people tent to take notice of that because they can see it for themselves, it's not white supremacy hear say made up by the MSM it's actually real.
You do know that mRNA doesn't change your genetic makeup, right, and that you have approximately a 0.0018 percent of being killed by the vax?
You do know that mRNA therapy has been in an experimental phase for over 30 years now and has never made it past Phase II trials until just recently with the first time EVER mRNA vaccine. But do tell us what the long term safety is for this "vaccine" that doesn't vaccinate you? We'll wait.
originally posted by: lSkrewloosel
Fir all the people that say 17,000 is still a fringe.
Where are the 17,000+ that are willing to put their signature down to support a counter argument
There won't be any.. after all Faccui represents science . Except 17,000 of them.
I know who I would listen too. Smigg
.
originally posted by: callyrox69
a reply to: AaarghZombies
I see you are just another lab rat shill!!
Remember the boosters shill, they will protect you and make sure all of your family take them as well!
Your shill mom, shill dad, and shill kids!!!
originally posted by: Bearack
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Smigg
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Smigg
In the US, 17,000 would be considered fringe. There are about 10,000-15,000 actual white supremist and nobody is seriously claiming that we should listen to them.
Your analogies are terrible, people tent to ignore made up groups like white supremist that can't be proven or shown to exist. An experimental gene therapy drug on the other hand that does actually exist and is killing people, people tent to take notice of that because they can see it for themselves, it's not white supremacy hear say made up by the MSM it's actually real.
You do know that mRNA doesn't change your genetic makeup, right, and that you have approximately a 0.0018 percent of being killed by the vax?
You do know that mRNA therapy has been in an experimental phase for over 30 years now and has never made it past Phase II trials until just recently with the first time EVER mRNA vaccine. But do tell us what the long term safety is for this "vaccine" that doesn't vaccinate you? We'll wait.
mRNA is well known and well understood.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: AaarghZombies
mRNA is well known and well understood.
Not sure if I would go so far as to say well known, but yes, mRNA itself is known and understood to a reasonable degree. And yes, it is not possible for the mRNA itself to cause a genetic effect, as it simply mimics mRNA naturally produced by the cell.
That's not my concern. I was able to look up the technical data on mRNA within 30 minutes of first hearing about the vaccine. It took me maybe a week to get up to speed on the cellular mechanisms involved (would have been a lot faster if medical researchers would speak English).
But what about the spike protein created by the mRNA? Is it reasonably understood? Do we have decades of data explaining what the spike protein does as it interacts with various biochemical processes?
TheRedneck
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
My first question, how many doctors are there in the world? Second question, how many doctors disagree?
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Smigg
The say "17,000" but aren't releasing the names. I wonder how many of these people are the usual suspects. Alternative healers, fitness guru and the Chiropractic types.
I'd be interested how many epidemiologists and virologists there are among them.
I could sign a random partition, and be verified, but how meaningful it would be beyond my personal opinion it would be could debatable.
originally posted by: Smigg
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Smigg
The say "17,000" but aren't releasing the names. I wonder how many of these people are the usual suspects. Alternative healers, fitness guru and the Chiropractic types.
I'd be interested how many epidemiologists and virologists there are among them.
I could sign a random partition, and be verified, but how meaningful it would be beyond my personal opinion it would be could debatable.
What's so upsetting to you about people being anti experimental gene therapy drug ? it's basic human behaviour to be sceptical in these types of situations. It's an experimental gene therapy drug TPTB are trying to force people into injecting into their bodies without their consent, how is that not a problem with you to the point where you start believing that people who do see it as a problem are somehow strange.
Look at how you just tried to demolish the claim that 17000 doctors are against this experimental drug, don't you find your behaviour strange ?
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
My first question, how many doctors are there in the world? Second question, how many doctors disagree?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: AaarghZombies
mRNA is well known and well understood.
Not sure if I would go so far as to say well known, but yes, mRNA itself is known and understood to a reasonable degree. And yes, it is not possible for the mRNA itself to cause a genetic effect, as it simply mimics mRNA naturally produced by the cell.
That's not my concern. I was able to look up the technical data on mRNA within 30 minutes of first hearing about the vaccine. It took me maybe a week to get up to speed on the cellular mechanisms involved (would have been a lot faster if medical researchers would speak English).
But what about the spike protein created by the mRNA? Is it reasonably understood? Do we have decades of data explaining what the spike protein does as it interacts with various biochemical processes?
TheRedneck
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: AaarghZombies
mRNA is well known and well understood.
Not sure if I would go so far as to say well known, but yes, mRNA itself is known and understood to a reasonable degree. And yes, it is not possible for the mRNA itself to cause a genetic effect, as it simply mimics mRNA naturally produced by the cell.
That's not my concern. I was able to look up the technical data on mRNA within 30 minutes of first hearing about the vaccine. It took me maybe a week to get up to speed on the cellular mechanisms involved (would have been a lot faster if medical researchers would speak English).
But what about the spike protein created by the mRNA? Is it reasonably understood? Do we have decades of data explaining what the spike protein does as it interacts with various biochemical processes?
TheRedneck
Yes, yes we do. It's a basic protein. What protein can and can't do is well known. Its not particularly exotic. Anyway its identical to the one on the surface of covid so it can't do anything to you that catching covid can't do.