Truthbomb: Doctor McCullough Joe Rogan podcast was just released

a reply to: chr0naut

a reply to: andy06shake

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Salander

Who are the people and who/where is the doctor?

Because as of this date the FDA to my knowledge has not authorized or approved Ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals.

Has Viagra been authorised or approved for use to save humans from dying from covid?

But it saved this nurse:
www.thesun.co.uk...

This is very helpful in understanding what's going on..
willemvincken.wordpress.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">mobile.twitter.com... %5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opindia.com%2F2022%2F01%2Frobert-malone-up-govt-withheld-information-from-us-ivermectin-fact-check%2F[/url ]

[url]https://willemvincken.wordpress.com/2021/09/17/ivermectin-is-currently-used-for-about-28-of-the-worlds-population/

When you use the Google (or another search engine), and you search for ‘Ivermectin”, you will find articles about Ivermectin for the use as a treatment for horses, some articles are talking about how bad it is, and there are some articles blaming the Ivermectin on excessive death and hurt and that it must be forbidden to have a subscription of “that poison”! Australia went that way.

It's cancel culture. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquin did not fit into their plan, both cost and efficacy would have prevented lock downs, profits and control. They new ahead of time that therapeutics and profalsctives needed to be addresses so when you Google ivermectin you get horse treatment links.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Wrong.
Studies were done on patients who were at the end hydroxychloroquin and ivermectin are to be used earlier in the diagnosis.
You see it would be like giving a covid-19 patient on a ventilator the vaccine and when he dies you conclude the vaccines don't work(they don't anyway).

a reply to: chr0naut

Both the Indian and Brazilian governments initially committed to campaigns of supply of Ivermectin and HQC for treatment of COVID-19. Neither government is recommending it any more because it proved to be ineffective.

Major study of ivermectin, the anti-vaccine crowd’s latest COVID drug, finds ‘no effect whatsoever’ (Brazilian study)" target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">willemvincken.wordpress.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">mobile.twitter.com... %5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opindia.com%2F2022%2F01%2Frobert-malone-up-govt-withheld-information-from-us-ivermectin-fact-check%2F[/url ]

[url]https://willemvincken.wordpress.com/2021/09/17/ivermectin-is-currently-used-for-about-28-of-the-worlds-population/

When you use the Google (or another search engine), and you search for ‘Ivermectin”, you will find articles about Ivermectin for the use as a treatment for horses, some articles are talking about how bad it is, and there are some articles blaming the Ivermectin on excessive death and hurt and that it must be forbidden to have a subscription of “that poison”! Australia went that way.

It's cancel culture. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquin did not fit into their plan, both cost and efficacy would have prevented lock downs, profits and control. They new ahead of time that therapeutics and profalsctives needed to be addresses so when you Google ivermectin you get horse treatment links.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Wrong.
Studies were done on patients who were at the end hydroxychloroquin and ivermectin are to be used earlier in the diagnosis.
You see it would be like giving a covid-19 patient on a ventilator the vaccine and when he dies you conclude the vaccines don't work(they don't anyway).

a reply to: chr0naut

Both the Indian and Brazilian governments initially committed to campaigns of supply of Ivermectin and HQC for treatment of COVID-19. Neither government is recommending it any more because it proved to be ineffective.

[url=https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-08-11/ivermectin-no-effect-covid]Major study of ivermectin, the anti-vaccine crowd’s latest COVID drug, finds ‘no effect whatsoever’ (Brazilian study)

[url=https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/india/new-covid-19-guidelines-drop-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-ivermectin/story]Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, other drugs dropped from new COVID-19 guidelines (India)

edit on 5-1-2022 by fringeofthefringe because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: chr0naut
in reply to: tanstaafl
The paper is primarily from scientists affiliated with the German Robert Koch Institute. The CDC are reporting/republishing it.

I know... as I said, junk science.

Except not. The studies were carried out in Pakistan and the American publisher is a highly regarded publisher of peer reviewed scientific papers.

The Lancet is highly regarded. Again... junk science.

If the Lancet was in the position of of publishing inaccuracies and lies,

If? They did publish a study that was nothing but lies.

they would not have retracted an article because it did not meet academic standards.

They wouldn't have had to retract it if they hadn't published a fake study full of lies. And they only retracted it because they got caught. And they, and others, do it all the #ing time.

As I have pointed out, hysterical laughter at something that is not humorous could be indicative of the onset of dementia.

But it is humorous, even more so because you actually think it is serious.

So... yet again, as I say to you quite often it seems...

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
a reply to: chr0naut

None of those figures make mention of the number of total doses of each of those medicines.

Surely the toxicity or otherwise of some drug is the ratio of its toxicity reports over the total doses administered.

You can't just compare the cases of one which may be rarely administered but has thousands of adverse events, and another which may have a higher number of total adverse events but has been administered greater than tens of thousands of times more frequently.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The nearly 3 hour interview chronicles almost every aspect of the corona pandemic, from the beginning when early treatment options like ivermectin were blocked, until now when vaccines are used as a one sized fits all approach with the continuing denial of anything else having any sort of efficacy including even monoclonal antibodies.

For those who don't know Dr. McCullough, he is literally the tip of the spear of the resistance movement along with others like Dr. Malone, who are trying to educate the public in all aspects of the corona pandemic, including, specifically, the safety issues surrounding the vaccine. He is one of the most published doctors, and is seen a innovator and leader in the field of cardiology.

Up until 2020, Dr. McCullough had a stellar record, but "mysteriously" when he pushed against the narrative, he has since been accused of spreading "misinformation" when not promoting the vaccine. He has been censored on multiple platforms for trying to speak out, but his bravery to push against the current genocide has saved many lives.

There are going to be a lot of people waking up after listening this and receiving their much needed red pill. As far as I know, it's only available on spotify, you can access it here:

JRE: Doctor McCullough Interview

Now I'm beginning to understand why Rogan is attacked so vehemently.

HUGE EXPOSURE OF TRUTH.