Truthbomb: Doctor McCullough Joe Rogan podcast was just released

The nearly 3 hour interview chronicles almost every aspect of the corona pandemic, from the beginning when early treatment options like ivermectin were blocked, until now when vaccines are used as a one sized fits all approach with the continuing denial of anything else having any sort of efficacy including even monoclonal antibodies.

For those who don't know Dr. McCullough, he is literally the tip of the spear of the resistance movement along with others like Dr. Malone, who are trying to educate the public in all aspects of the corona pandemic, including, specifically, the safety issues surrounding the vaccine. He is one of the most published doctors, and is seen a innovator and leader in the field of cardiology.

Up until 2020, Dr. McCullough had a stellar record, but "mysteriously" when he pushed against the narrative, he has since been accused of spreading "misinformation" when not promoting the vaccine. He has been censored on multiple platforms for trying to speak out, but his bravery to push against the current genocide has saved many lives.

There are going to be a lot of people waking up after listening this and receiving their much needed red pill. As far as I know, it's only available on spotify, you can access it here:

JRE: Doctor McCullough Interview

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I just finished watching it .

Holy hell this going to set some Lefty Panties on FIRE.

Groundbreaking interview.

Let me get this hashtag started.

#Dr.McCulloughdidnotkillhimsellf

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I subscribe to his Telegram channel, I recommend it because he is clearly a Doctor who actually gives a # about his patients and people in general.

Oh, and there's facts in there too, so it might not be for everybody.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

It's a shame on clown earth that people your trying to reach wont even click this link (if I would say post it on facebook) let alone they are going to spend three hours on something which the media made them believe is not a legit source, even though you can't actually state that.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

a reply to: chr0naut

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Some here are still promoting vaccines and boosters. Both which have proven ineffective vs Covid-19.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first anti-COVID-19 vaccine on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions in the media).

Wrong, all of those treatments have different degrees of efficacy, but work. He explains exactly how a shell company was created to fund fake studies against HCQ, and then disapeared. Ivermectin may be better, but there are numerous drugs that can help, like fluvoxamine, ivermectin, quercetin, almost any zinc ionophore.

c19hcq.com...

Two years into the crisis and not a single early treatment protocol from any institution, just a single minded goal to vaccinate people for eternity while the most vaccinated countries are experiencing record case rates. A massive agenda, yes.

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

a reply to: chr0naut

Chr0 your a Broken record mate.

Did you listen to a WORD this Medical Doctor said. ?

He clearly states the studies of Hydroxychloroquine were conducted on patients who had the virus for more than two weeks which drastically reduces the effectiveness of the drug , the Earlier you give the drug the better which I have seen with my own eyes in a Hospital as a nurse.

Are your pants on fire ?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Some here are still promoting vaccines and boosters. Both which have proven ineffective vs Covid-19.

Truth.
But there are a lot of members here that can’t handle the truth.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Some here are still promoting vaccines and boosters. Both which have proven ineffective vs Covid-19.

Truth.
But there are a lot of members here that can’t handle the truth.

And some that want nothing more than to force their truth on you, in spite of facts.

a reply to: JinMI

The constant yearning to be "right" has gone into overdrive. Facts do not matter anymore.

It's the only way I can wrap my mind around how it's okay that vaccinated are dieing from Covid. The definition of vaccine had to be changed. The definition of anti vaxxer had to be changed.

When you have to change the language to still keep your narrative alive, your narritive is dead.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first anti-COVID-19 vaccine on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions in the media).

Wrong, all of those treatments have different degrees of efficacy, but work. He explains exactly how a shell company was created to fund fake studies against HCQ, and then disapeared. Ivermectin may be better, but there are numerous drugs that can help, like fluvoxamine, ivermectin, quercetin, almost any zinc ionophore.

c19hcq.com...

Two years into the crisis and not a single early treatment protocol from any institution, just a single minded goal to vaccinate people for eternity while the most vaccinated countries are experiencing record case rates. A massive agenda, yes.

c19hcq.com...

The Brazilian and Indian governments were actually promoting and distributing Z-Packs, HQC, and Ivermectin. Now, a few months down the track, they have stopped, and their respective health authorities have ruled them as ineffective and dangerous. Why might that be? Their people were expecting and hopeful that they would work. Their government was committed to them, but in practice, they were worse than useless.

That hasn't stopped the same snake-oil salesmen from continuing their misinformation campaign, even claiming that the failures seen in countries where they were used, there were vast positive numbers of successful treatments. It's the snake-oil guys that are the liars.

Like have you heard the snake-oil guys say about how Ivermectin is 'cheap'? It has never been cheap. It is one of the more expensive medicines, even for veterinary use, and 'a course of it' is way more expensive than three doses of the Pfizer vax. Check out the prices for yourself!

Wake up that when one person is saying something contrary to numerous credentialled, peer-reviewed, closely monitored, regulated, and supervised groups, that it is usually the lone voice, unconstrained by anything, that is the liar.

Additionally, the doctor has claimed that asymptomatic COVID-19 does not happen. It is part of the basis of his allegations. Just about everyone knows of people who have tested positive, multiple times, but without symptoms.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

BS. BOTH are PROVEN to treat CV. I know plenty of people, including my own father, who took them and were better w/in 48 hours while in a foreign country. Stop spreading disinformation that could harm people.

Monoclonal antibody treatments is ABSOLUTELY being blocked in hospitals across the country still.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first anti-COVID-19 vaccine on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions in the media).

Wrong, all of those treatments have different degrees of efficacy, but work. He explains exactly how a shell company was created to fund fake studies against HCQ, and then disapeared. Ivermectin may be better, but there are numerous drugs that can help, like fluvoxamine, ivermectin, quercetin, almost any zinc ionophore.

c19hcq.com...

Two years into the crisis and not a single early treatment protocol from any institution, just a single minded goal to vaccinate people for eternity while the most vaccinated countries are experiencing record case rates. A massive agenda, yes.

c19hcq.com...

The Brazilian and Indian governments were actually promoting and distributing Z-Packs, HQC, and Ivermectin. Now, a few months down the track, they have stopped, and their respective health authorities have ruled them as ineffective and dangerous. Why might that be? Their people were expecting and hopeful that they would work. Their government was committed to them, but in practice, they were worse than useless.

That hasn't stopped the same snake-oil salesmen from continuing their misinformation campaign, even claiming that the failures seen in countries where they were used, there were vast positive numbers of successful treatments. It's the snake-oil guys that are the liars.

Like have you heard the snake-oil guys say about how Ivermectin is 'cheap'? It has never been cheap. It is one of the more expensive medicines, even for veterinary use, and 'a course of it' is way more expensive than three doses of the Pfizer vax. Check out the prices for yourself!

Wake up that when one person is saying something contrary to numerous credentialled, peer-reviewed, closely monitored, regulated, and supervised groups, that it is usually the lone voice, unconstrained by anything, that is the liar.

Additionally, the doctor has claimed that asymptomatic COVID-19 does not happen. It is part of the basis of his allegations. Just about everyone knows of people who have tested positive, multiple times, but without symptoms.

You sound like a broken record and no one believes a single word you say. Over 300 clinical trials for HCQ, its just one of many treatment options.

Fauci's own research back in 2005 showed HCQ was effective against coronviruses. Just stop.

a reply to: chr0naut

The Brazilian and Indian governments were actually promoting and distributing Z-Packs, HQC, and Ivermectin. Now, a few months down the track, they have stopped, and their respective health authorities have ruled them as ineffective and dangerous.

Source?

What I'm seeing is a sub 10k per week covid case load for each of those two countries with Brazil having 60ish% vaccine rate and India having 37ish%.

They have ceased because they no longer need to use it.

originally posted by: shaemac

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

BS. BOTH are PROVEN to treat CV. I know plenty of people, including my own father, who took them and were better w/in 48 hours while in a foreign country. Stop spreading disinformation that could harm people.

N ew Study Shows Hydroxychloroquine Doesn’t Prevent Covid-19 Coronavirus Infection - Forbes

No evidence of clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 infection and requiring oxygen: results of a study using routinely collected data to emulate a target trial (.pdf)

Hydroxychloroquine does not benefit adults hospitalized with COVID-19 - NIH

Hydroxychloroquine flunks Phase III trial in mild-to-moderate Covid-19 - MedCity News

Hydroxychloroquine for the Prevention of Covid-19 — Searching for Evidence - NEJM

Misguided Use of Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19
The Infusion of Politics Into Science - JAMA

Monoclonal antibody treatments is ABSOLUTELY being blocked in hospitals across the country still.

Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of COVID-19 - NCDHHS

The issue is that they are having supply problems producing enough mAbs to cover the need. No-one is blocking anything.

Biden administration moves to avoid shortages of Covid-19 monoclonal antibody treatments - CNN

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shaemac

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He is still promoting hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, even above that of ivermectin. Both of which have now proven ineffective against COVID-19.

Also, no one is blocking the monoclonal antibody treatments. That was what Trump received when he was hospitalized with COVID-19, and the FDA has granted EUA approval for several different monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19.

Interestingly, only 7 days after the EUA was granted for the first COVID-19 vaccine, on 11 Dec, there were claims of bells palsy and syncope reactions to the vaccine. Yet at that stage, very few had been vaccinated at all (e.g: on the 14th December 2020, no-one at all had yet been vaccinated in the US, yet 3 days later -18 December 2020, there were claims of numerous adverse reactions and deaths in social media. For some reason, no-one is making those same claims anymore, now there is actual VAERS data).

BS. BOTH are PROVEN to treat CV. I know plenty of people, including my own father, who took them and were better w/in 48 hours while in a foreign country. Stop spreading disinformation that could harm people.

N ew Study Shows Hydroxychloroquine Doesn’t Prevent Covid-19 Coronavirus Infection - Forbes

No evidence of clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 infection and requiring oxygen: results of a study using routinely collected data to emulate a target trial (.pdf)

Hydroxychloroquine does not benefit adults hospitalized with COVID-19 - NIH

Hydroxychloroquine flunks Phase III trial in mild-to-moderate Covid-19 - MedCity News

Hydroxychloroquine for the Prevention of Covid-19 — Searching for Evidence - NEJM

Misguided Use of Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19
The Infusion of Politics Into Science - JAMA

Monoclonal antibody treatments is ABSOLUTELY being blocked in hospitals across the country still.

Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of COVID-19 - NCDHHS

The issue is that they are having supply problems producing enough mAbs to cover the need. No-one is blocking anything.

Biden administration moves to avoid shortages of Covid-19 monoclonal antibody treatments - CNN

Your first link is June 9th 2020. 1.5 years ago. No need to read any more.

YOU KNOW, WE DO HAVE GOOD PEOPLE WORKING IN THE LOWER RANKS OF THE PHARMA COMPANY WHO COULD COME UP WITH A BETTER VACCINE THAT DOES NOT HAVE SO MANY SIDE EFFECTS.

Oops, cap lock was on and I did not even look at it before posting.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Well, I did read them. They are all over a year old. Newest one being Nov, 2020. Before any vaccines are out.


Gleam from that, what you will.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Well, I did read them. They are all over a year old. Newest one being Nov, 2020. Before any vaccines are out.


Gleam from that, what you will.

I can read between the lines. These were all done very quickly and in an attempt to put focus on vaccines. Rogan recently asked Dr. Mccullough about this being used as political tool as well