Stop using the term 'Anti Vaxx'

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot
Is bastion more qualified to break down the study than Dr John Campbell?

Dr John Campbell goes through everything on the study...... including typos.

He says the paper can't even be found.

Basically you have one person(with a dubious history) claiming the increased risk with no evidence provided.

And for clarification John Campbell is not a medical doctor, he a nurse with a PhD in nursing. With that makes him more or less qualified than bastion I could not say.

I believe Baston has a PhD in statistical analysis but on here we are all just anonymous posters on a conspiracy site.

a reply to: ScepticScot
No he doesn't......he says it definitely needs further investigation, just as Dr Aseem Malhotra does.

a reply to: ScepticScot
Who has a dubious history?

Let me see some fact check links.

Campbell told Insider. "Given that no one can be fully informed because it's such a massive subject now, it's good to have someone that tries to examine this objectively."

www.insider.com...

If you are not anti vacination and someone uses the term antivaxxer why does it bother you?

If you are not an antivaxxer it does not apply to you so just move on and get on with your life.


a reply to: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot
Who has a dubious history?

Let me see some fact check links.

www.insider.com...

Gundry the author of the abstract.

he has a history of dubious claims.

a reply to: ScepticScot
Forget Gundry.

Let's have further investigation like these two Doctors have said.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot
Forget Gundry.

Let's have further investigation like these two Doctors have said.

He's talking about claims made by Gundry. Right now there is nothing thete to investigate.

There is constent montoring of health impact of the vaccines, if there is any real data to show an increased risk of heart disease then that should and would be investigated l.

originally posted by: nonspecific
If you are not anti vacination and someone uses the term antivaxxer why does it bother you?

If you are not an antivaxxer it does not apply to you so just move on and get on with your life.


a reply to: v1rtu0s0

It may not apply, but it is being applied as a pejorative. Just listen to this raving lunatic from NT here in Australia.

a reply to: ScepticScot
Dr John Campbell and Dr Aseem Malhotra have looked at the study.....they say it needs further investigation.
And it should not be ignored.

a reply to: ScepticScot
Did you not hear what Dr Aseem Malhotra said about non related covid deaths increasing?

a reply to: ScepticScot
You got it in for Gundry, great!

What dirt do you have on Dr Aseem Malhotra and Dr John Campbell?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot
You got it in for Gundry, great!

What dirt do you have on Dr Aseem Malhotra and Dr John Campbell?

Why would In have in for Gundry?

What I'm saying is that the source of the claim of increased heart attacks is an abstract, with multiple errors , that Dr campbell says the paper can't be found, written by a single person who has a history of making claims that research doesn't support.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot
You got it in for Gundry, great!

What dirt do you have on Dr Aseem Malhotra and Dr John Campbell?

Why would In have in for Gundry?

What I'm saying is that the source of the claim of increased heart attacks is an abstract, with multiple errors , that Dr campbell says the paper can't be found, written by a single person who has a history of making claims that research doesn't support.

Two Doctors are saying there could be other factors other than what the abstract article says.

However, after both looked and researched, they both say that it requires further investigation......to rule it out.

Lots of things are said about lots of things though.

People make a lot of comments about racists but I'm not a racist so it doesn't bother me when they do.



a reply to: Flatcoat

a reply to: ScepticScot

So the jab works well on the new variant?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

What do you care if people are posting bitchute videos and are against a vaccine they don't trust, honestly who cares right? You trust Science and Doctors why does this piss you off? The doctors say "Jump!" and you say, "How High?" That's the type of person you are, you don't question anything, you just do what they tell you. Let me clue you in on something, doctors are dumb, they don't know what's wrong with you either! Have you ever been to a doctor that says things like, "Well I think you may have this or that, here let me give you some pills so we can fight whatever infection you have." They don't know what's wrong with you, they have to perform tests and look it up on the computer, which means doctors are not very smart. The only reason we think doctors are smart, they know the human body but suck at diganosing people. Yet, you get your panties in a bunch over people not vaccinating due to free will. So, i ask you again wtf do you care? You did what the doctors and scientists told you to without questioning it, so in my mind you have no right to question others.

a reply to: liliththedestroyer

The doctors say "Jump!" and you say, "How High?" That's the type of person you are, you don't question anything, you just do what they tell you.

Just like the
"Milgrim Experiment"

a reply to: sciencelol

I agree with you, no you're not an idiot and you're not crazy. All of our ailments are from vaccines, most kids who are vaccinated, most of them have some sort of learning disability, ADHD, and some form of Autism, they have allergies, earaches, prone to get sick a lot, and some of them form asthma. It's not just Autism it's a whole shlew of problems from vaccines. My son has been diagnosed with ADHD/Aspergers, he had sever asthma, and allergies to dogs apparently. He had to be on a nebulizer okay to breath. I blame this on one appointment he had before he turned 6 months old, where they injected him with 10 vaccinations in one visit. I didn't want to do that but here i was a young 20 year old mom who was too stupid to say no I don't wnat that because I knew nothing of patient rights, or staggering vaccines. i think that's what messed my son up, yeah I feel guilty to this day.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

OMG! That was freaky and scary, that one guy was like i don't want to do this, i would have left. Screw that! That reminds me of that Ghostbusters movie, where doctor vegman (sp) was shocking this young guy, even though he was getting the right answers and he wanted to score with the blonde. Not so funny when you think of it. I am sure that expeiemnet messed up a lot of people. Hell doctors have been messing with peole's minds for a long time, here take this drug, oh it may causesome side effects but they are perfectly harmless. Next thing you know you suffer from depression, anxiety, bipolar and so on. Yeah I would be out of a job if we could erradicate mental health issues. LOL

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot
You got it in for Gundry, great!

What dirt do you have on Dr Aseem Malhotra and Dr John Campbell?

Why would In have in for Gundry?

What I'm saying is that the source of the claim of increased heart attacks is an abstract, with multiple errors , that Dr campbell says the paper can't be found, written by a single person who has a history of making claims that research doesn't support.

Two Doctors are saying there could be other factors other than what the abstract article says.

However, after both looked and researched, they both say that it requires further investigation......to rule it out.

As already said I think any potential side effects should be investigated, and they are.