The Ancient Egyptian Stones Were Perfectly Precise How is this Possible? Many Qs Little Answers

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

Question 1) Why would giants built structures with doors and corridors that were too small for them to enter?

The giants built the pyramids, NOT entrances, or corridors, built later on, BY humans, that's what confuses people about who built them.

Even YOU know the pyramids have been tampered with for thousands of years, by humans, right?

The great pyramid was built with a gold cap, for example. Somehow, all the gold was taken off the capstone, but nobody ever thought of looking INSIDE the pyramids - which supposedly had doors and corridors, with gold tombs inside!

Compare the outer structure, with the doors and corridors 'only humans could use, or enter', as you say....

They are crude, in comparison to the outer structure itself, right? Sure they are.

So why would they be able to build the great pyramid, for example, with such amazing precision, and finesse, while butchering the doors and corridors inside of it??

Because THAT PART was done by humans, AFTER they were built already, by the giants who once ruled Earth.


Look at how crude the 'entrances' are, compared to the main structure itself....

It's a joke!


Obviously, the entrances and corridors were done later on, after it was built. The ACTUAL builders of these pyramids, were the Nephelim, and those who butchered it later on, the Pharoahs, who stole the gold from the capstone, for their tombs, inside of it.


That's what slaves were for - to burrow INTO the pyramids, and create corridors inside, to make rooms for tombs of the Pharoahs, of gold, stolen from its capstone.

And this answers your other two questions....

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Question 2) What about the tombs of the architects who built the pyramids, which clearly house humans?
Question 3) What about the villages that housed the people who built the pyramids, which were clearly inhabited by humans?

Again, it was already built before humans came along, and butchered into it, afterwards, and put tombs of gold inside.

That's why nobody can replicate it today, and explains the crude doors and corridors inside, and why the gold was taken from it's capstone, to be used for their tombs, later on.

Easter Island is surrounded by massive heads, each one built of a single stone, weighing tons each.

They do NOT resemble human heads, with human facial features. They look SIMILAR to humans, with eyes, nose, and mouths, but distinctly DIFFERENT than us, for sure. They have extremely elongated heads, compared to human heads, for one thing.

Why would humans ever build non-human heads, if humans really DID build all of them? It makes no sense at all. Those who DID build them, in their likeness, would have built them, and did. The giants built them, in their likeness, that's why they don't resemble humans -because they weren't BUILT by humans!

I've heard some people suggest the heads have similar features to Polynesians, etc.

It's all BS. No human looks like that, not even CLOSE to it!

a reply to: turbonium1

...and these "giants" are where?

Their remains? Remains of their homes??

Nonsense.

There have been any number of studies done about the Easter Islands culture--no giants required.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: turbonium1

...and these "giants" are where?

Their remains? Remains of their homes??

Nonsense.

There have been any number of studies done about the Easter Islands culture--no giants required.

We've found fossils of these giants, which seem to disappear soon afterwards, or claimed to be a hoax, same as usual. Nothing to see here, folks!


What happens when someone finds huge fossils, or a massive skull? They turn it over to 'experts', who know everything about fossils, of course. What do they all believe? That humans evolved from ape-like species, millions or billions of years ago, most likely. Or something like that, anyway.

They never claim a giant skull or fossil might actually have been a species of giants, that once existed on Earth. Just giant dinosaurs existed once, millions and billions of years ago, but no giants did, that's for sure!

They removed a book from the Bible, that described the giants who once ruled Earth, before humans, and the Great Flood that caused their extinction. Why would anyone remove that book, from the Bible? Any reason?

Giants are mentioned in many ancient texts, all over the world, which would either be the most amazing coincidence in human history, or it was the truth, and I don't believe in magical coincidences. They're all too similar to be fictional.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
There are actually dozens of drawings detailing how to build pyramids. The disagreement is over which one of them is most historically accurate, not whether they can be done at all.

For example, whether or not ramps were used: Link

They don't have a clue about how to build it, let alone have several methods that would work!


Nobody has been able to actually replicate this in the real world, in one part of it, despite many attempts in the past, all of which failed to work, soon afterwards.

If one DID work, don't you think we'd KNOW about it by now, and put an end to this debate? Sure we would. It'd be settled for all time, being replicable in the real world, using tools of the day, with a human crew, and so forth....


So let's say one plan uses ramps, with certain dimensions, and materials, and a number of people involved, and so on....

This is a specific step in a plan, which can be tried in the real world. If it works, we can try another step of it, and so on.


But the first step doesn't even work, that's the problem. The mass of each stone is beyond our capabilities, no matter WHAT method is used, in the effort.

If it's possible, please point out one plan that would work, with specific details included for it, no more BS about how they've figured it all out, except for which plan was actually USED!!

a reply to: Byrd

Yes , and neither is the Theory that the Great Pyramid at Giza was a Device to Produce Vast Amounts of Piezoelectricity .


Keep Denying Ignorance.............

Ofcourse its possible. They had more advanced technology than today. If someone says otherwise, allow him to demonstrate to you how to create it with inferior technology than today.

a reply to: turbonium1

Hoax's? No kidding.

That they are.

Just curious, how do you define "giant"?

a reply to: SpaceBoyOnEarth2

...and your evidence of more advanced than today is???

allow him to demonstrate to you how to create it with inferior technology than today.

There are any number of videos that show precisely that. Here's one:




All that was required was a copper saw blade, grinding agent, and water. So, is that an adequate demonstration??

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: SpaceBoyOnEarth2

...and your evidence of more advanced than today is???

allow him to demonstrate to you how to create it with inferior technology than today.

There are any number of videos that show precisely that. Here's one:

All that was required was a copper saw blade, grinding agent, and water.

...

And there's more about it here (see Ch. 4 in particular).

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: turbonium1

Hoax's? No kidding.

That they are.

Just curious, how do you define "giant"?

Numbers 13:32–33 — King James Version (KJV 1900)
32 And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of a great stature. 33 And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

The Book of Enoch describes the giants as 300 ells tall, one ell being about 1/2 meter in length, so 300 ells is about 1500 meters tall!

If we say an average human is about 100 times the size of an average grasshopper, which is a very conservative estimate, but let's say it's true for argument's sake.....how big would the giants have been, in comparison?

If an average human is 5 ft 8 inches tall, or 68 inches, then a giant, 100 times larger, would be 6800 inches tall, or 566.66 feet tall!

1500 meters is 4921 feet, nearly 10x more than the other estimate, of 566.66 feet.

Some claim the actual figure is only 30 ells, not 300 ells, or about 50 feet tall, instead.


The Bible describes Goliath as a giant, but not as being from a RACE of giants, which is an important distinction. For example, we describe humans over 7 feet tall as 'giants', though they're still humans, as we are. It's comparing human to human, not human to another race, Some tribes of humans are pygmies, some tribes are taller than average humans are, but both are humans, so Goliath would be human, and compared to other humans at the time, giants would be someone over 6 feet tall, or 7 feet tall, but maybe they just exaggerated it, as being 8 or 9 feet tall.

I'm referring to theactual RACE of giants, the Nephilim, who ate human flesh, which defied God's command, who flooded the Earth to wipe them out, and start anew, with humans.

Ancient texts from around the world, describe a race of giants, who once ruled the Earth, before humans came along, it cannot be just a coincidence, that they all describe a race of giants, who once lived on Earth, before the great flood!


Such a race would certainly be able to build the pyramids, hold and carry 20 ton blocks of stone, like we can with 100 lb. stones, since it's all relative.

a reply to: HawkEyi

The pyramids were built by an advanced civilization from the Iberia Peninsula. That would place the region around Spain and Portugal. The native Iberian Lynx sports the classic Pharaonic headdress in its facial bearded tuffs indicating a foreign cat influenced the royal hat design. The lynx is the embodiment of the Egyptian sun god Ra.


Iberian Lynx



Ra in lynx form killing the Egyptian god of chaos called Apophis.

The Egyptians imitated what was already built there, by the giants.

At first glance, it appears like they built the pyramids, from all their drawings, and tombs inside the structures, but this was done AFTER they were built, not during their build.

Look at how the work is not nearly so precise for the entrances, and the interior corridors, and shafts, compared to the main structures, it's not even close to it, but it WOULD be, if it was the same builders for it.

Look at other massive structures, like the Eiffel Tower, for example, and see how uniformly it's built, as one work, one builder, one project. And see how it's modified later on, by others, and it's not the same thing. Maybe it's close, but it's just not the same as the rest of it. This happens all the time, with many structures, previously built, then modified later on.

But for the pyramids, it's far more obvious to see the differences, some more obvious than others, but they are all distinctly unlike the structures themselves.


Look at how the entrances are built, for example. It's crap, compared to the main structure itself. Sloppy, not precise. Crude, not smooth. Not level, like the main structure is.


The pyramids were already built, before they were 'butchered' by the Egyptians - at least, in comparison to the actual builders, anyway.

a reply to: turbonium1
The entrances and interiors were covered over and sealed shut.
You might as well complain about how unfinished your wall looks after you rip out a piece of sheetrock.

Harte

originally posted by: lostinspace
a reply to: HawkEyi

The pyramids were built by an advanced civilization from the Iberia Peninsula. That would place the region around Spain and Portugal. The native Iberian Lynx sports the classic Pharaonic headdress in its facial bearded tuffs indicating a foreign cat influenced the royal hat design. The lynx is the embodiment of the Egyptian sun god Ra.

Nope. Not a lynx.

If you look at the many images of the Great Cat Ra, you will see that he has a long tail and he curls it around his haunches. This is a wild desert cat, common to the deserts of Egypt, which had a range that overlapped that of a small jungle cat.
The two began hanging around humans (and their grain harvests with lots of tasty vermin) and eventually they domesticate themselves and crossbreed and become one of the founding lines of today's domestic cats.

Here is a better look at the image you posted - you can see the tail curving around his haunches and continuing over his back. It's not a short bob-tail but rather the long tail of the desert cat.

a reply to: Byrd
Why, I would go as far as to say that it might be somewhat important to find out what a lynx looks like before making claims about what a lynx looks like.

Harte

Great thread, some great ideas. I'm not into this University of Amsterdam students using the word "primitive" and I'm just going to toss out their whole theory based on their colonial mind set.

Surprised to read so many slave and giant comments. I thought most people knew about the discovered gravesites that had gifts in them proving the builders weren't slaves.

I believe there could have been very big and strong humans centuries ago. There are humans now that are very tall and strong. It's quite possible there was slightly bigger humans 10,000 years ago or longer.

I believe there was a race of people 1,000's of years ago that eventually went extinct in the last 100 years or so. This race were master stone builders, more advanced than other races on the planet at that time. This race was spread out through Africa, the Middle East, parts of Europe, Asia, Polynesia, Central and South America, and the Caribbean.

I believe their techniques and capabilities were just more advanced than other humans with stone building. There's too many similarities among many ancient cultures, and in their ancient mythology that connects them all. There was an advanced race of ancient stone builders who could also navigate the oceans very easily, and these people were spread out all over the world.

There is a legend of advanced ancient stone builders, and those people are called the Menehune, which in Tahitian is Manahune meaning common people. The Menehune inhabitated Hawai'i before the Tahitians came. The Menehune also inhabitated Marquesas. In Nukuhiva we can see stone building techniques found elsewhere in the world and stone building that depicts non human beings. There is a huge connection of Polynesian and South and Central Americans and Taino people through stone building, sweet potato, tattoos, and earrings. There is also a huge language connection with Polynesia and Asia. There's even similarities with Tribes of North America.

European anthropologists want the world to think brown people are primitive and that white Europeans have always been the most advanced and that all these connections are just a coincidence because they're primitive people who live in nature. Which is just so insanely inaccurate because the word nature was made up by Europeans.

There are many examples that clearly show there was a race of humans who inhabitated around and south of the equator who were very very advanced. People from Europe, mainly ancient Greeks would travel to Giza to learn from the Ancient Deities.

So how were the Pyramids built? They were built by an advanced race of humans who were much better at stone building than anyone else. It's the colonial mind set thinking we can figure it out or duplicate it. The only way to figure it out I'd say would be through oral history. There's definitely some elders or language speakers still alive today who know. Oral history is one thing that is difficult for colonialism to destroy.

a reply to: Harte

Hooke, Harte, Byrd, Seagull and the rest of your lot.

Sometimes I wonder if you've lost the ability to walk upright. With such big heads and huge puffed up chests you must surely have a time carrying all that weight above the hips.

Your like the teenager that kicks all the toys out of the sandbox and wipes away the roads and mountains the toddlers have built, as in your mind they are stupid and imaginary.

The same time that rips down all the blankets in the living room fort, because obviously it's a parlor, not a play room. You probably also tore down your siblings Lego castles, as they weren't period correct.

Sheesh, give it a rest.
Some of the greatest breakthroughs and inventions are taken from imaginary ideas, that started as out subjective theorys. Maybe implausible at first, but refined until solid a complete theory emerges (Einstein).

This isn't an accredited college course on ancient architecture, as defined Hooke, Harte,, Byrd, and associates Ltd.

It's a site to discuss people's ideas and speculation. Although some people's ideas or theorys may appear immature, and ignorant to the more institutionally educated crowd. To others they are fun and wonderous theorys that help to relax and dream of "what if”.

Over there last decade you've had the opportunity to have your say. A quick perusal of topics, will show how you feel and what you believe. There is no need to exacerbate an already flooded archive of your self important posts.

Just let it go, let the dreamers dream. Educate those willing to listen, and ignore those who aren't, rather than filling pages upon pages with back and forth thrown at people who aren't receptive to your ideas being shoved down their throats.

originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: turbonium1
The entrances and interiors were covered over and sealed shut.
You might as well complain about how unfinished your wall looks after you rip out a piece of sheetrock.

Harte

There's parts of the original work, which show how crude it is compared to the main structure. Any more excuses?

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: turbonium1
The entrances and interiors were covered over and sealed shut.
You might as well complain about how unfinished your wall looks after you rip out a piece of sheetrock.

Harte

There's parts of the original work, which show how crude it is compared to the main structure. Any more excuses?

How about some examples?