Why Does Biological, Organic Life Exist in a Universe that is Inorganic ?

a reply to: Xtrozero
I totally disagree.

We’ve come to the end of our discussion, rather not spend my time going in circles.

You’re entitled to believe whatever you want.

a reply to: Xtrozero

The universe “sees” and “laws” of the universe? Like I said I believe life is the universe attempting to understand itself and we’re nothing more than the eyes of a universal consciousness. That universal collective consciousness could be viewed as God. The point I’m making is that I believe consciousness comes from a higher dimension for lack of a better term, and intelligent life is from this undetectable higher plane of existence.

a reply to: Grenade

The vanity of man has no bounds

originally posted by: TerraLiga
The vanity of man has no bounds

The self-deprecation of man has no bounds.

a reply to: TerraLiga

Vain to feel connected to a universe of which you’re undeniably apart of? You might think you’re nothing more than a soup of random atoms but don’t expect others to treat this life with such disrespect and contempt.

Keep insults to yourself and either contribute to the topic or knuckle drag yourself back to the cave you crawled out from. If you don’t have the intellectual capacity to engage in a thread then best avoid commenting altogether. Human beings and our brains are still the most intricate and complex structures in the known universe. Well some of us are more complex than others clearly.

The difference between an agnostic like myself and an atheist like you is that only one of us are taking an absolute position on a question which is unknowable. I believe in a creator, I will however not profess to know for sure. Only an extremist would deny the possibility of creation, or claim to know the true nature of reality or its beginning. Unless you’re 13.8 billion years old then you don’t know sh!t about how the universe began and no amount of equations will prove anything otherwise.

a reply to: Xtrozero

It’s probably only us have gone to the moon but by no means certain. The moon could hold many mysteries as of yet undiscovered and who knows even ancient life. Seems logical that if life started next door then under certain conditions or subterranean environment life could well have been on the moon in the distant past, whos to say there’s not an offshoot of humanity living under the surface now? I don’t like to talk in absolutes, imagination is a valuable attribute, even if our current hive minded members of society would like to stifle it.

Since the scientific community is full of atheists would someone like to name some for me.

Here comes the list of Marxists and homosexuals with hardly a single recognised name.

originally posted by: Grenade
Since the scientific community is full of atheists would someone like to name some for me.

Here comes the list of Marxists and homosexuals with hardly a single recognised name.

These secular (un)scientific theories go hand-in-hand with Marxism. The Marxists needs a belief system, which is essentially unintelligent luck. This then alienates people from the pursuit of truth and they blindly rely on 'experts' to think for them. They become complacent with half-truths, and their hubris establishes a wall that disallows further discussion. You can see it just in this thread alone. Real empirical facts send these people into absolute fits

a reply to: cooperton

The fact we can have constructive and friendly discussion despite our differences in theological belief says it all really. Some people just don’t want their beliefs challenged or questioned, especially when it’s someone who’s clearly more academically qualified in the fields they use for “proofs”.

a reply to: cooperton

That's not what your bible says.

originally posted by: TerraLiga
a reply to: cooperton

That's not what your bible says.

This isn't a violence issue, so turning the other cheek does not apply.

This is intellectual, and you give to pigs what pigs like to eat.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: cooperton

The fact we can have constructive and friendly discussion despite our differences in theological belief says it all really. Some people just don’t want their beliefs challenged or questioned, especially when it’s someone who’s clearly more academically qualified in the fields they use for “proofs”.

Yeah I once would continually show respect to someone who disrespected me but not anymore. I save my pearls for people who respect it, and deliver sludge to those disrespect it. What it comes down to is someone wanting the truth more than they want to be right.

a reply to: TerraLiga

Have i really? Feel free to quote and make sure you don't lose context by selectively cutting. I've said it's foolish to think you can understand 600 million years of evolution without any historical record, because it is.