The Fight for Election Integrity Continues -- Audits, Criminal Investigations, Legislative Reform

originally posted by: Boadicea
And all the more reason to wonder just what the hell Trump is really up to.

He's extremely easy to gauge, he's looking for the next person(s) to take advantage of. That's it. That's his life's M.O.

Trump paid the firm $700,000. And the other firm we previously knew about $650,000. They should’ve come here to a ATS and this thread - dummies.

Boadicea, do you think the firm Trump hired didn’t look hard enough? It’s what their company does so…


Ken Brock the founder tweeted -


“Attention election conspiracy theorists: Fox News just coughed up more than $750 million to settle the defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems. Yet another 2020 false fraud claim put to rest,”

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

He's extremely easy to gauge, he's looking for the next person(s) to take advantage of. That's it. That's his life's M.O.

I'd actually be relieved if it really was that simple! Maybe for Trump it really is, but not so much for others. Maybe I'm still missing something. Or maybe I'm overthinking it all.

I'm still trying to figure that out.

a reply to: knoxie

He's extremely easy to gauge, he's looking for the next person(s) to take advantage of. That's it. That's his life's M.O.

I'm more inclined to think they didn't look at all.

At the very least, numerous courts around the country have confirmed and affirmed that election laws were violated, and that legally proscribed safeguards were violated or ignored altogether.

It's impossible to honestly call an illegal and unlawful election fair.

a reply to: Boadicea

If he didn’t look at all, could Trump sue him? At least for his money back?

Anyway, Trump shouldn’t have hired either of these firms because it is not gonna help him at all with Jack Smith.

Block said, he was sent fraud claims by Trump’s campaign to study. Some came from the campaign itself, but others originated from sources outside the campaign and informal advisers to Trump, which the campaign passed along.

a reply to: Boadicea

Maybe if you look at Republicans, you’ll find your fraud, but something tells me you don’t look at that side…

originally posted by: knoxie
Trump paid the firm $700,000. And the other firm we previously knew about $650,000. They should’ve come here to a ATS and this thread - dummies.

Boadicea, do you think the firm Trump hired didn’t look hard enough? It’s what their company does so…


Ken Brock the founder tweeted -


“Attention election conspiracy theorists: Fox News just coughed up more than $750 million to settle the defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems. Yet another 2020 false fraud claim put to rest,”

I heard that the government spent billions covering up the election fraud evidence.

A settled court case doesn't disprove anything, but that's just basic logic.

My thoughts are that the entire case could have just been a way to launder money to Dominion.

I think this because we all know that the CIA loves to overthrow governments and elections are an excellent tool for doing so. We also know that the "intelligence" community has infiltrated most, if not all, of the major media outlets, and we know that media is a major tool for manipulating people. So, basically you could have a bunch of 3 letter agencies with various levels of control over our media and election equipment companies, that could hypothetically have a transfer of money via a friendly court case and settlement. I know this is thinking outside of the box, but this still seems very plausible to me in the clown world that we are living in.

originally posted by: knoxie

Block said, he was sent fraud claims by Trump’s campaign to study. Some came from the campaign itself, but others originated from sources outside the campaign and informal advisers to Trump, which the campaign passed along.

The details of what he "was sent" by Trump's Campaign would easily show whoever "sent" the claims was probably already planted or bought-off soon after the election in anticipation of investigations. 😎

none of these "misfires" and incompetent reports are coincidental 😎

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Boadicea

Maybe if you look at Republicans, you’ll find your fraud, but something tells me you don’t look at that side…

Oh Knoxie. Knoxie Knoxie Knoxie.

I'm in Maricopa County, watching our county Republicans work hand-in-hand and cheek-to-cheek with our state Dems to pull off the fraud and cover it up. To be specific, our Republican County Recorder and our Republican (4 out of 5) County Supervisors. They're the ones who are currently refusing to turn over the ballot signatures.

So yes, Knoxie, I have looked at the Republicans right along with the Dems, and I've found the fraud.

Does anyone have any thoughts on why Kari hasn't sought a court order -- either from the lower court or the Supreme Court -- to force the county to turn over the ballot signatures?

There is nothing in the law that precludes the county from doing so. They have chosen not to, "in the best interests of the public." Unlike the actual ballots, which is prohibited by law.

I would think the Supreme Court order would be more than adequate grounds to demand their release in court.

Am I missing something?

National, Arizona, and Maricopa County Election Officials Gathering For Secret Zuckerberg Funded, Soros Tied US Election Summit At ‘International Spy Museum’

And now, ahead of the 2024 Presidential election, a group of some of the nation’s most notorious election fraud deniers and election officials, including Secretaries of State, are set to have a secret Elections summit in Washington DC from May 8-May 9 called “Summit on American Democracy”. One would think that Election officials who are concerned about Democracy would be transparent with their actions, and invite members of the public to attend their summit. But, this upcoming election summit is “invite only” and not open to the public.

The Center for Election Innovation & Research (CEIR) is organizing and hosting the conference.

Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is a multi-state partnership which claims to allow states to share voter registration data with each other. It is currently used by 25 states within the United States, but its critics argue that it enables election fraud and violates data privacy.

Becker’s upcoming summit has an invite only hidden guest list, and a Speaker list and agenda that currently features six Secretary of States (NV RI, CO, GA,NM, NJ), Major Garrett, CBS New’s Chief Washington correspondent, Sarah Longwell, Publisher of The Bulwark, an American anti-Trump conservative news and opinion website, and Ben Ginsburg, the Co-Chair of the Election Official Legal Defense Network (EOLDN).

Of the election officials who are listed as speakers at the CEIR summit, some have received national exposure for their refusal to look thoroughly into reported voter fraud in the 2020 and 2022 elections, including Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, Gabe Sterling, the chief operating officer of Georgia’s Office of the Secretary of State, and Bill Gates, the County Supervisor in Maricopa County, Arizona.

The Gateway Pundit should be pointing out that Raffensperger and Sterling are Republicans, as is our own Bill Gates. The public needs clear distinctions... which Republicans are fighting FOR election integrity and which Republicans are fighting AGAINST election integrity. It matters.

Knoxie -- are you paying attention? I'm not only looking at Republicans, I'm calling them out. All of these Republicans have been mentioned repeatedly in these pages, and all are suspected/guilty of election fraud (in the broadest sense of the word). And these Republicans aren't the only ones. But they are ALL working hand-in-hand and cheek-to-cheek with Democrats. Can you do the same? Can you look at the Democrats and call out their wrongdoing?

Were They Told to Stand Down? The DOJ’s Arizona Election Fraud Investigators Go AWOL Following 2020 and 2022 Elections – Where Are They Today?

A couple of weeks before the 2020 election, the DOJ District of Arizona announced a team would look into election complaints. The U.S. Attorney for that Phoenix office was Michael G. Bailey. He appointed (AUSA) Sean Lokey to lead efforts investigating complaints. This also included possible civil right violations of voters. Their press release announced Lokey as the new District Elections Officer (DEO). It even provided Lokey’s direct phone numbers (602-514-7516 & 602-361-6516). The DOJ was ready to fight election fraud…..so we thought.

Arizona was a hotbed of issues after the 2020 election. Arrests were made in Yuma, substantial ballot harvesting evidence from True the Vote, Liz Harris canvassing showed horrific fraud, Dr. Shiva proved over 17,000 duplicate ballots, signature matching was turned off in Maricopa, and so on. Does anyone remember what Lokey investigated? The Arizona Senate conducted our country’s first sophisticated forensic election audit, the Maricopa County ballots. It was also a federal election, and the final report showed numerous issues, if not fraud. Sean Lokey was nowhere to be found during any of these issues.

Well damn. I don't remember this. Two weeks before the election... BEFORE!

I've long suspected that the Feds came in, declared they were "investigating", effectively slapping everyone involved with a gag order while they conduct their investigation, usurped the jurisdiction of local officials, and effectively tied everyone's hands while they do nothing. Including former AG Brnovich.

I don't suspect any longer.

a reply to: Boadicea

Sure you have, sweetie..

😝😂😂😂😂

a reply to: Boadicea

I wonder if any prior meetings had any information leaks?

And now we have at least one chain-group effort that may be funding and influencing election related cases with paid off lawyers that always seem to omit key points that lead to cases being dismissed. 😬

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Boadicea

I wonder if any prior meetings had any information leaks?

Could be. Could also be they know they really can't afford any leaks (or infiltrators) in the current conditions and don't dare take any chances...

Maybe it's a good time to pray for one or two whistleblowers to emerge from this summit...

And now we have at least one chain-group effort that may be funding and influencing election related cases with paid off lawyers that always seem to omit key points that lead to cases being dismissed. 😬

That's the truth. When I can find holes big enough to drive a Mack truck thru, I know it's more than incompetent lawyers... it's worse than incompetence. It's deliberate sabotage.

WATCH: Video Shows Fraudulent Mail-In Ballot Signatures Accepted by Maricopa County – Kari Lake Attorneys to EXPOSE Fraudulent 2022 Signatures in Trial Court

After determining that OVER 420,000 ballot affidavits “failed signature verification” in the 2020 Election, based on their review of roughly 25% of 1.9 million envelopes, Busch and her team extrapolated this data. They concluded that there were “a total of 290,644 failed signatures in the 2022 Election.”

a reply to: xuenchen

Thanks for posting!

I had the link up to post yesterday and completely dropped the ball. 🥴

Corrupt Arizona Elections Officials Weaponize Sanctions Against Kari Lake, Abe Hamadeh, and Mark Finchem to Target Legitimate Claims and Discourage Election Challenges

BREAKING: Attorneys for Gateway Pundit Including America First Legal File New Class Action Lawsuit Attacking the Heart of Internet Election Censorship in America

Here’s how it would work.  In the lead-up to the 2020 and 2022 elections Government agencies across the government, as well as hard-left groups would complain about speech they disliked on social media.  EIP would then immediately interface with the respective tech company and pressure the tech company to censor the speaker.  This resulted in tens of millions of tweets and posts and other speech being censored, and tens of thousands of Americans being censored, suspended and banned.  This is what happened to Gateway Pundit, and as a Gateway Pundit reader, odds are it happened to you, too.

EXCLUSIVE: Runbeck Election Services Refuses to Comply with Legal Public Records Request, Maricopa County Served With Letter Threatening Lawsuit – REQUESTS INCLUDED

Gotta love the poetic justice in the response --

After the bogus response from Runbeck Election Services, Blehm sent another public records request to Maricopa County, quoting nearly word for word the Arizona Court of Appeals Decision, which required 2020 Maricopa County Election auditor Cyber Ninjas to “promptly furnish” “audit-related public records,” stating, “Cyber Ninjas has become the custodian of those records under the PRL [Public Records Law].”

Chef's kiss to Kari's defense team!

Double post -- deleted by me.

Sorry!