Are you happy with your every day life style

originally posted by: Grenade
So I should only eat meat. Gotcha.

Have fun, Mr. Creosote.

a reply to: Grenade

as a self proclaimed health expert, I suggest, wait, no, I demand that you drink copious amounts of beer, eat bacon with every meal, and stick to lots of carbs. Noodles, bread, cake. Wash everything down with beer. And not just any beer, you need the stuff in the white can with black letters that says "beer". Or if you are from Cleveland, find some POC. (I think it's the same stuff) And stop exercising! that makes you waste all that good stuff you just ate.

Spend time sitting on the couch more, and always have a snack (chocolate or other candy) near.

This advise isn't really optional, so get to it.

I hope this helps with your obvious nutrient deficiencies I have expertly noticed you lacking.

Beer.

a reply to: network dude

I like this, you should call it the Fatkins Diet.

a reply to: network dude

Sounds more fun than this waste of time exercising and eating vegetables.

I’ll let you know how it goes if I don’t die of heart disease or liver failure first.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: tanstaafl

So I should only eat meat. Gotcha.

Not at all... you should also eat a lot of high quality fat (saturated animal fat that is). So, at least mostly (95+%)...

a reply to: tanstaafl

If you say so.

I call BS.

Every other primate has a varied diet. Next you’ll be telling me bananas are bad for monkeys.

I suspect your opinion is influenced by some kind of religious belief. The whole copper and iron idiocy.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: tanstaafl
Every other primate has a varied diet.

Yes, but we are not monkeys. Unlike us, the digestive tract of 'every other primate' is the reverse of ours - much longer large intestine, much smaller small intestine, and a large cecum (responsible for breaking down cellulose/vegetable/plant matter).

Next you’ll be telling me bananas are bad for monkeys.

Sorry to disappoint...

I suspect your opinion is influenced by some kind of religious belief. The whole copper and iron idiocy.

No idea what 'copper and iron idiocy' has to do with any religious aspect, but, nope, wrong again. I'm all about the science... real science, not observations/epidemiological nonsensical studies that can be used to show whatever the 'study's' author (or more appropairtaely, the one funding the study's author) would like..

a reply to: tanstaafl

Care to provide a source for this science you speak of?

The vast majority of nutritional information i can find completely contradicts what you're suggesting.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: tanstaafl

Care to provide a source for this science you speak of?

It is there if you are truly interested,

The vast majority of nutritional information i can find completely contradicts what you're suggesting.

Yes, it does. Interesting, isn't it...

a reply to: tanstaafl

Yes, provide me with a source, I treat all information objectively unless it’s some randomer on the internet talking BS.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: tanstaafl

Yes, provide me with a source, I treat all information objectively unless it’s some randomer on the internet talking BS.

As I said - it is there for those who seek it.

Nobody held my hand to find it, and it is isn't something I can teach you. You have to be willing to learn it for yourself.

a reply to: tanstaafl

So you don't have a source.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: tanstaafl

So you don't have a source.

I have plenty, but not enough to convince someone who refuses to look.

a reply to: tanstaafl

As i told you i'll look if you provide them.

Or, don't bother and continue to act like a stubborn fool.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: tanstaafl

As i told you i'll look if you provide them.

I don't spoon feed things to people capable of feeding themselves.

Or, don't bother and continue to act like a stubborn fool.

Stubborn? Fool? Methinks thou dost speak in reference of/to thyself.

a reply to: tanstaafl

You're unwilling to provide sources to backup your claim. I'm supposed to take you seriously when you can't provide a single article? The burden of proof is on you. You claim it's scientific yet can't provide a single source.

Cheers for the wonderful insights that you conjured directly from your ass.

Think i'll continue to listen to qualified professionals over anonymous pseudointellectuals on a web forum.

As i said the information i have researched contradicts your claims.