Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich is Stunned by the Amount of Potential 2020 Election Fraud.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I dont have a pet theory, as you do. I like looking at all the possibilities, as truth often turns out stranger than fiction. And I dont pretend to know exactly what happened or didnt happen.

You just shut the intellectual door on anything that doesnt suit yours. You are very monolithic and believe in your own omnipotence too firmly.

originally posted by: Ghostsdogood
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Thats going to leave a mark.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Maybe, when we find out this isnt just isolated local yokels voting more than once. I want to know which IT contractor they were employed by, and if it was for Dominion or any other IT company hiring H1Bs.

a reply to: BrujaRebooted
Sunshine is good for everyone!

a reply to: Ghostsdogood

That's nice, let me know when it was wide spread fraud that could have changed the election. Maybe your IT guy's cell phone conference phone can be used again to figure this out.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
I feel like the FBI might think otherwise here.

Do they? Let me know when they give you details that line up with your wacky theories that the election outcome was changed.

I dont expect you to respond to any real information.

Kinda like you and your election fraud fantasies.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
I dont have a pet theory, as you do.

I don't have any theory, that's the point, which obviously bothered you so much you asked me to invent some.

*twirls finger next to temple*

a reply to: BrujaRebooted

But there's no evidence that that happened. And even if it did do you honestly think it happened to the degree that it would change the outcome of an election? It would have to be tens of thousands of votes.
Then of course there's the ridiculous theory that the elderly would all have voted for Trump but the staff forced them to vote for Biden.
I mean that would have to be the logical meat to the story right?
The number of assumptions needed to make a logical story is high here.

a reply to: carewemust
As is any organization that no longer supports the BIG LIE!
Ever notice that any friends or supporters of Trump get kicked to the curb the moment they say one thing against him?

Election fraud co-conspirators. LOL. Of course.

a reply to: BrujaRebooted

You believe our elections arent riggable

Because they are not.
The amount of coordinated effort to not only rig an election but to hide the evidence so well that a year later it still hasn't been proven is huge.
Every city, every municipality would have to be in on it but every action regarding elections and handling ballots is overseen by members of every party represented on that ballot so how can that happen?
That plus every city and every municipality has their own ballots with their own local candidates listed on top of the presidential candidates so there could never be one ballot to include everyone.

originally posted by: Karen657
a reply to: BrujaRebooted

You believe our elections arent riggable

Because they are not.
The amount of coordinated effort to not only rig an election but to hide the evidence so well that a year later it still hasn't been proven is huge.
Every city, every municipality would have to be in on it but every action regarding elections and handling ballots is overseen by members of every party represented on that ballot so how can that happen?
That plus every city and every municipality has their own ballots with their own local candidates listed on top of the presidential candidates so there could never be one ballot to include everyone.

There only needed to be six, or so, cities involved, but you are correct, election rigging is big business and currently a national security matter. That's why the election had to be "fortified" as Time magazine reported.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Quote me where I said the outcome was changed.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Your pet theory is that elections in the us are solid and reliable.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
Quote me where I said the outcome was changed.

Quote yourself where you say it wasn't.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
Your pet theory is that elections in the us are solid and reliable.

Wrong. I'm saying there was no widespread fraud that could have even come close to changing the outcome of the 2020 election.

a reply to: carewemust Like to see them get a warrant to arrest. Right. Its as if they want us to know they know we know buy cant do anything. You start to be conditioned to levels of subjugation.

a reply to: Karen657
There are discrepancies forwarded to the AG in AZ that are tens of thousands of votes.

The 2000 election came down to one state and fewer than 5000 votes.

Stakes are very very high. Winner has incredible power. Dont be naive.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
The 2000 election came down to one state and fewer than 5000 votes.

You just make that up or is your memory that poor? The Electoral Vote was 306 to 232, one state did not decide it by 5,000 votes.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I cant do that because I havent said either way. Im patient enough to keep learning what what I can about what went on. The report from the AZ audit is intriguing and Im interested if any other states get as far along, and find similar problems.

I believe its possible to steal an election. Easy, no. High risk, yes. High rewards, of course. I believe there are some that would try. Was this one stolen? I believe there was a great deal of shenanigans, enough to sway it, that I dont know.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
I cant do that because I havent said either way.

Weak. Either your boy was cheated or he wasn't.