WHO Adverse Reaction Reporting site seems to challenge narrative.

www.vigiaccess.org...

VigiAccess was launched by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2015 to provide public access to information in VigiBase, the WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products. Side effects – known technically as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) – are reported by national pharmacovigilance centres or national drug regulatory authorities that are members of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring (PIDM). WHO PIDM was created in 1968 to ensure the safer and more effective use of medicinal products. 

So in order to make a report to VigiAccess, you apparently must be a national pharmacovigilance centre or drug regulatory authority. This is unlike VAERS because many complaints are made that VAERS can be posted on by anyone. So here we have some oversight on that matter.

The numbers as reported from VigiAccess are as follows:

Adverse reactions:

Africa: 53,319
Americas: 747,048
Asia: 127,877
Europe: 1,040,145
Oceania: 60,911

Broken down by age group:

0-27 days: 282
28 days to 23 months: 1222
2-11 years: 1351
12-17 years: 26,127
18-44 years: 793,305
45-64 years: 647,593
65-74 years: 198,394
75+ years: 134,424
Unknown: 226,242

Sex distribution:

Female: 1,406,340
Male: 595,610
Unknown: 27,350

So this does challenge the narrative that young men are more likely to experience adverse reactions to the vaccine. It is more 18-44 and 45-64 age group and a lot more females are affected by adverse reactions than men.

Why do you think this is not being reported?

Note: when you search VigiAccess, you have to type covid-19 vaccine specifically or Comirnaty because if I just typed covid 19 vaccine even without the hyphen it wouldn't pull up the stats.

a reply to: Chalcedony

Question on the younger than 12 category, how can there be data when there aren't any approved vaccines for that age group?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I wondered that too. My best guess is maybe they had a reaction during a trial?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Chalcedony

Question on the younger than 12 category, how can there be data when there aren't any approved vaccines for that age group?

Test subjects and idiots vax'ing their kids anyway.

We have plenty of idiots in this world.

a reply to: Chalcedony

That could be a possibility.

originally posted by: infolurker
Test subjects and idiots vax'ing their kids anyway.

How are they going to 'vax their kids anyway'? It has to be administered by a healthcare professional.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Probably from the ongoing clinical studies in those age groups.

originally posted by: infolurker

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Chalcedony

Question on the younger than 12 category, how can there be data when there aren't any approved vaccines for that age group?

Test subjects and idiots vax'ing their kids anyway.

We have plenty of idiots in this world.

Yep. The propaganda machine is in full force to shame idiot parents into vaxing their kids with this unapproved experimental vaccine.

Female is very likely due the stories we've been hearing about anomalies with women's periods and pregnancies where as with the young men, cases of myocarditis having risen is very obvious and more unusual at that age. Menstruation can be affected by many other things and often not serious, though for women who are like clockwork they'll notice changes and report it likely.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: infolurker
Test subjects and idiots vax'ing their kids anyway.

How are they going to 'vax their kids anyway'? It has to be administered by a healthcare professional.

Sure it does

EMT's were administering it here. Everyone follows the rules.


wink wink.

originally posted by: infolurker
Sure it does

wink wink.

It does.

a reply to: igloo

Just seems odd to me how there are actually mainstream news articles about the myocarditis in young males but no mention of how these vaccines actually cause more adverse reactions overall in women than men. It's like... why report this evidence but not that evidence? Why are they pushing that narrative over this one?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Chalcedony

Question on the younger than 12 category, how can there be data when there aren't any approved vaccines for that age group?

Only a very confused person actually has a question like this. You must think the entire world is like the world you see around you. LOL!!!!

In Africa, you really think they care about the age recommended for the vaccine? Africa is the most populated continent, and has 52 countries, but you are so naïve you actually think they all follow the same rules as the rest of us.

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. No wonder you beleive so many thing that arent true.

Thanks for the laugh. Now we all know to never take you seriously again.

originally posted by: Chalcedony
Africa: 53,319
Americas: 747,048
Asia: 127,877
Europe: 1,040,145
Oceania: 60,911

I find it interesting that Asia with over 4 billion people only have 128k and America with 330 million would have 747k, EU that has 1 billion people has 1 million. All this makes little sense...

Also what is the lowest level of side effects... If people in America and EU are reporting sore arms, a few days of not feeling well etc then no sh!t that the numbers would be so high.

What is the true numbers of people who had to see their doctors for additional problems, and/or had to go to the hospital based on the vaccine? We also need to understand that the vast majority vaccinated are the high risk that do have serious health issues and do die regularly with or without the vaccine.

In the end my point is all this isn't cut and dry in suggesting anything at all. When the CDC follows up on the severe cases in VAERS they don't even find 1% of them as correct.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Chalcedony

Question on the younger than 12 category, how can there be data when there aren't any approved vaccines for that age group?

They've been doing trials on infants through 12 for a while now. It is likely the trial patients.

originally posted by: TrollMagnet
In Africa, you really think they care about the age recommended for the vaccine?

Africa only has a 4% vaccination rate so unless the bulk of the under 12 reactions came from them you should probably work on your math.

originally posted by: Chalcedony

I wondered that too. My best guess is maybe they had a reaction during a trial?

Do you think they put 3 million+ kids in trials with 29k having reactions?

a reply to: Xtrozero

Here is a breakdown of the adverse reactions from the link:

Blood and lymphatic system disorders (81120)
Cardiac disorders (95800)
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders (1053)
Ear and labyrinth disorders (66964)
Endocrine disorders (2589)
Eye disorders (74568)
Gastrointestinal disorders (426587)
General disorders and administration site conditions (1249946)
Hepatobiliary disorders (3872)
Immune system disorders (28019)
Infections and infestations (128575)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications (94992)
Investigations (265566)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders (46546)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (605783)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) (2825)
Nervous system disorders (888607)
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions (4155)
Product issues (3515)
Psychiatric disorders (96215)
Renal and urinary disorders (16025)
Reproductive system and breast disorders (70555)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (213696)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (283487)
Social circumstances (13910)
Surgical and medical procedures (16924)
Vascular disorders (109965)

Also submissions to the WHO site I linked which is where all this data came from can only be made by pharmaceutical regulatory bodies. Not Joe Blow like in the case of VAERS.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus


But c'mon, if Karens will take their toddlers to hang out with convicted sex offender pedophiles for the trans cause do you think they won't go out of their way to get a friend administering shots to shoot up their kids out of pure fear? It is happening.



Not to mention, other countries are pumping into younger than 12 already.

www.cnn.com...

While many high-income nations, including the United States and most members of the European Union, now offer Covid vaccines for children 12 and older, a handful of countries have now authorized the shot for younger people. Meanwhile, severe vaccine inequality persists on a global level, with many developing nations continuing to struggle to provide first and second doses to high-risk groups -- with the very idea of getting shots to children still a pipe dream.

Cuba begins vaccinating children as young as 2

abcnews.go.com...

Covid: Which countries are vaccinating children and why?

www.bbc.com...

China - jab approved for children three and over
In June, China began to allow some children from three to 17 years old to be offered shots of a vaccine produced by drug-maker Sinovac, making it the first country to approve a jab for such a young age group.

In Chile, it has already been approved for use in children from six years old

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

They've been doing trials on infants through 12 for a while now. It is likely the trial patients.

Reaction rate is well under 1% even worst case, so they got 4 to 5 million kids in the trials? lol