It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: crankyoldman
The date supports the theories of a planned set of events !!!!!!!đđŹ
Gets kind of strange on this one. Baldwin known for playing DJT on SNL.
Q "Shot" most containing Oct = "10" or Jan = "1" with reduction of "0"
Inversion or mirror would be Baldwin/DJT kills, rather than Baldwin/DJT being killed.
Gets stranger...
[...]
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: crankyoldman
The date supports the theories of a planned set of events !!!!!!!đđŹ
Gets kind of strange on this one. Baldwin known for playing DJT on SNL.
Q "Shot" most containing Oct = "10" or Jan = "1" with reduction of "0"
Inversion or mirror would be Baldwin/DJT kills, rather than Baldwin/DJT being killed.
Gets stranger...
Set to Epstein Ranch.
EDIT: It gets even more strange...
and I didn't even dig into the Red October stuff.
I think Alec Baldwin ends up going to jail over this.
When I first heard about it I thought it was total BS. That wasn't a "prop gun" prop guns don't fire rounds. Not even blanks. If a prop gun fired blanks it would be called a "real gun." Blanks are no different from real rounds other than the fact that they don't have lead in them. A gun that can fire a blank can fire the real thing.
So right off the bat the media is lying. Which means there's more to the story that they're trying to cover up.
Also, why would he be pointing ANY gun at the cinematographer and director? Makes no sense. Also, he shot two people. The "blanks" idea doesn't work when you realize he shot multiple people.
I think the dude snapped and straight up tried to murder a couple folks on set thinking he could get away with it.
I don't know if I buy the Trump rant part so much. I mean, we all know he hates Trump, but considering that he shot multiple people, how can his anti-Trump rant explain him shooting multiple people? I think it's more likely that the dude just got pissed at the director and cinematographer and thought he's Alec Baldwin. He can shoot these people here and now and get away with it.
I guess it might make sense if he had been ranting about Trump and those two people voiced support for Trump...
The husband of Halyna Hutchins, the cinematographer who was fatally shot by actor Alec Baldwin with a prop gun on Thursday, is a corporate lawyer in Latham & Watkins' Los Angeles office.
Matt Hutchins joined Latham as an associate this year. Earlier he was an in-house lawyer at an entertainment company and practiced at Kirkland & Ellis and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, according to his LinkedIn profile.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
This was my point PFS, "Mandates" are effectively just ADVISORIES not LAW... So employers should be asked, by those threatened with termination:
"Do you realise that because it is only a mandate, the applicable law will be employment law, NOT the mandate. As a mandate is only advisory, a court will find that you have either made me redundant, or terminated me without cause. Either way, a court will give me punitive damages!"
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND
RELEASES REPORT>
mRNA vaccines are destroying people's immune system
(It's happening at a gradual stance/over time) especially the double vaccinate between 40_70 years old > they have already lost/DAMAGED over 40% of their immune system and capabilities..
originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
Wow! Well, we know who lives in his head 24/7.
đ¨ Confirmed: U.S. Atty John Huber passed the ball off to Special Counsel John Durham.
Durham is investigating the CLINTON FOUNDATION. Funding was approved.
NCSWIC!
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Hutchins was also recently the cinematographer for a 2021 film called 'The Mad Hatter'.
www.imdb.com...