It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: PillarOfFire
The whole head and long legs/tentacles reminds me of the Elon Musk Neural Link concept ..... Maybe the insertion of which in now considered non-consensual
originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
These mandates are doing exactly what the "New Green Deal" was trying to do. So I doubt it's going to change these peoples minds much. After all if you're a "special person" you can just charter a flight at the tax payer's expense.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
These mandates are doing exactly what the "New Green Deal" was trying to do. So I doubt it's going to change these peoples minds much. After all if you're a "special person" you can just charter a flight at the tax payer's expense.
Oh, it surely won't change the policy makers' minds, but what I mean is that these companies are going to have to say they will not comply. One of the airline companies has already reversed course and said they will not fire anyone for refusing the vaccines. They're going to shut down the mandates whether Joe Biden likes it or not.
On the other side, I can definitely see the establishment continue to ramp up their rhetoric towards people who refuse the vaccine. What happens if they start calling we anti-vaxxers "terrorists" and start trying to come after us? Do you think that would be enough to wake folks up? I would sure hope so.
In his speech on Monday, Kim took direct aim at recent U.S. statements that insisted it is “not hostile” toward Pyongyang.
Criticizing Washington for “wrong decisions” and “wrong actions,” Kim complained about U.S. “control,” “sponsorship” and “tacit” support for South Korea’s arms buildup. He also faulted the U.S. for a spike in military tensions, labeling Washington the “root” of the unstable situation surrounding the Korean Peninsula.
“I wonder if there is any person or state who believes in its claim that [the U.S.] is not hostile to the DPRK and, if any, I am curious to know who they are,” he said.
NK News
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating
These mandates are doing exactly what the "New Green Deal" was trying to do. So I doubt it's going to change these peoples minds much. After all if you're a "special person" you can just charter a flight at the tax payer's expense.
Oh, it surely won't change the policy makers' minds, but what I mean is that these companies are going to have to say they will not comply. One of the airline companies has already reversed course and said they will not fire anyone for refusing the vaccines. They're going to shut down the mandates whether Joe Biden likes it or not.
On the other side, I can definitely see the establishment continue to ramp up their rhetoric towards people who refuse the vaccine. What happens if they start calling we anti-vaxxers "terrorists" and start trying to come after us? Do you think that would be enough to wake folks up? I would sure hope so.
Play "end game."
What happens in Australia? Do the government goons just say "ah, sorry, we're going to back off?"
What happens with Team Joe? After calling the unvaxxed demons who are ruining everything, are they going to say "well, to save the Airlines, the Ports and Corporate Profits we take it back?"
They are all in, they cannot turn tail because they loose all the control they obtained and they won't get it back.
No system of control ever willingly gave the ground they obtained, they are all in on this. The problem is they assumed it is 2010 not 2021 and the evolution never happened. That amuses me, the made zero adjustment in rhetoric or strategy.
From a philosophical stand point this game of immovable object meeting unstoppable force is fascinating.
Regardless, nothing is going back to the way it was, we cannot unsee and they cannot retreat, and the damage to the control system as it was is permanent.
Worth noting their entire plan relies on connectivity using their programmed AI systems. They are one excess electron from losing their entire power structure. We've explored it a lot here, swapping out theirs for ours turns them into the servant class overnight.
Asked whether Democrats have failed to effectively persuade the public that a massive influx of social spending is necessary, Pelosi turned the question around on the reporter.
“Well I think you all could do a better job of selling it, to be very frank with you, because every time I come here I go through the list: medical leave, climate, the issues that are in there,” Pelosi said.
To persuade the public, Pelosi, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, and other prominent Democrats have repeated the talking point that the Build Back Better plan 💩 will cost "zero dollars" because it is effectively subsidized by steep tax hikes on high-earners.
@HUNTSMAN
I like DeSantis, but this is politics, not reality.
It was just a few weeks ago draymen were threatening to strike due to the insane wait time to get into one of Miami's main terminals.
Not enough trucks or rail, either.
Charleston or Mobile would be better choices.
“When people ask me, ‘If you ruled the world, what one thing would you do?’ – I think about that a lot,” Pelosi said, laughing.
Jared Cohen is the founder and CEO of Jigsaw at Alphabet Inc. He also serves as an adjunct senior fellow for the Council on Foreign Relations. Prior to Alphabet, he was Google’s first director of ideas, and chief advisor to Google’s executive chairman Eric Schmidt. From 2006 to 2010 he served as a member of the Secretary of State’s policy planning staff and as a close advisor to both Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton. His fifth best-selling book, Accidental Presidents, examines the eight instances in American history when a president has died in office.
Thirty-one distinguished Republicans had signed a manifesto assuring voters that a vote for Harding was a vote for the League. But Harding interpreted his election as a mandate to stay out of the League of Nations.