It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Increased risk of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was found after a first dose of both vaccines—a week later with BNT162b2 than with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
The risks of these outcomes after vaccination were much lower than those associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the same population
According to two recent, non-peer-reviewed studies, people who recovered from COVID-19 produced a robust immune response that was superior to vaccination alone, and adding one or more vaccine doses offered even stronger protection
I disagree, stats do show that the vacced have much reduced symptoms, and that is what it is all about
originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: MiddleInsite
Except that doctors are pressured to push pharmaceuticals
originally posted by: norhoc
Then it is not a vaccine. I thought vaccines were about vaccinating and eliminating what you are vaccinating against. If it is just about easing symptoms then why don't they just treat people with any number of treatments already out there ? At this point with a leaky vaccine you are just creating more variants and making this worse on everyone
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: norhoc
He has just as much of a chance of dying whether he is jabbed or not.
I disagree, stats do show that the vacced have much reduced symptoms, and that is what it is all about. If you get the virus it is no longer new to your system and the body can attack it quicker and better. It is about as simple as that...
originally posted by: CircumstancialEvidence
Which stats show this? Source that please.
I have seen nothing which substantiates what you claim. Not saying you are wrong but claims such as the ones you are making here should be backed up by credible sources.
How worried should we be? As of April 26, 2021, the CDC reports 9,245 cases of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 after vaccination. We’ll do the math for you: that’s roughly 0.01 percent or approximately one in 10,000 of the more than 95 million individuals who were fully vaccinated as of that date. To be clear, the CDC acknowledges that this number is a vast undercount due to under-reporting and the fact that mild and asymptomatic infections are unlikely to be detected. Because the vaccines are so good at preventing symptomatic illness, asymptomatic or very mild infections are likely to be caught only if vaccinated people are regularly tested, as they are at MIT. Still, it’s abundantly clear that the vast majority of fully vaccinated people are well protected against moderate to severe illness.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MDDoxs
Poor fella. Nothing works 100%. Life = Risks.
Kudos to those who explore!
originally posted by: TheMirrorSelf
Ummm...it's not as simple as that actually. The body, post-vax, has never actually been exposed to the virus. That's because the shot is not, by definition, a vaccine. There are no dead or reduced viral cells present which is what a vaccine is.
Now, I have to admit that I'm wildly disappointed in the ATS community on this one, because I was expecting WAY more jokes about the horse de-wormer side of this story. C'mon ATS...get it together.
originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: Xtrozero
I disagree, stats do show that the vacced have much reduced symptoms, and that is what it is all about
Then it is not a vaccine. I thought vaccines were about vaccinating and eliminating what you are vaccinating against. If it is just about easing symptoms then why don't they just treat people with any number of treatments already out there ? At this point with a leaky vaccine you are just creating more variants and making this worse on everyone