Fatal Heart Inflammation Officially Recognized as Being Caused by Pfizer Vax

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

We have been doing mRNA therapy for at least 3 decades, yet still not one mRNA treatment has ever been FDA approved. Why do you think that the treatments we have been experimenting with for the last three decades has never been FDA approved, yet an experimental mRNA vaccine that has been brought to market in as short as a year and a half will all of a sudden meet all the safety protocols?

Please tell us all how these 2 mRNA vaccines, with no long term data, are assuring you that your long term safety is assured? I'd like to know.

And regarding the non-mRNA vaccines, you do realize that many nations have stopped administering them over safety concerns and Guillain-Barre autoimmune paralysis.

Many countries are rushing to develop their own pill version of a vaccine using antiparasitics versus mRNA. Japanese, for the most part, have refused to take this experimental cocktail and are developing their own.

I'm absolutely for vaccines and even think anyone who has comorbidities or the elderly should 100% take the vaccine. I do think there is some long term health concerns that we still need to address with these current vaccines and I would like those answered before too many people are administered. A pandemic could be the least of our problems if 2/3 the planet become immunocompromised.

How so many forget when we rushed the Polio vaccine, the Cutter incident, that infected well over 40,000 people with the live Polio virus.

a reply to: BatSars



Starting to see it all over...

a reply to: Bearack

We will have mRNA vaccines approved in a few months. Then what will the argument be?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I am sure those FDA mRNA vaccines would be done with open and transparency. Normally FDA approvals take years. To wait for the long term studies.

Whats the rush?

Also you should catch up with the Pfizer and Albania thread. Pfizer states.

Accordingly Pfizer and its Affiliates shall have no liability for any failure by Pfizer or its Affiliates.

These mRNA vaxs have zero liability...

Then what will the argument be?

Clearly not without clear transparency and honesty. These mRNA vaxs are being rushed. There is no long term study being and already if you walk around in your community you might eventually hear a few people talking about how some are regretting the vax

Even as far by saying "Yeah i think those of us who got those vaxs are guinea pigs"

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I stand more chance of being harmed by the jab than I do of covid killing me....same with my kids.

Get it if you want.....not my concern nor my problem.

Literally false. You're spreading fake news and propaganda. You're CNN.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I see you glossed by my questions to you. Are you on auto reply?

a reply to: HawkEyi

You misunderstood what emergency use does. All vaccines follow the same testing processes, whether they are approved for emergency use or through a typical license. What makes it faster is production can be started while in testing. Usually, the manufacturer would apply for a Biologics License Application (BLA). If the FDA determines that the vaccine is safe, works and that manufacturing can be done safely and consistently, it will grant a license for the vaccine.

In a public health emergency, manufacturing may occur while vaccines are still in development, rather than after approval. These efforts happen simultaneously, and instead of filing for a BLA, the manufacturer files for Emergency Use Authorization.

However the testing is exactly the same they have to go through each phase of the trials there is no diference. What is diferent is the government will reimburse a company for manufacturing costs if the drug fails it trials.

a reply to: Bearack

His defending Pharma that user avoided a number of my replies on Pfizer lawsuits as well.
With the usual.

"Talk to your Doctor"
Are there some in here pushing the covid vax?

a reply to: dragonridr

Yes just like AZ vax was right?

You misunderstood what emergency use does. All vaccines follow the same testing processes, whether they are approved for emergency use or through a typical license. What makes it faster is production can be started while in testing. Usually, the manufacturer would apply for a Biologics License Application (BLA). If the FDA determines that the vaccine is safe, works and that manufacturing can be done safely and consistently, it will grant a license for the vaccine.

And you think this is done with open transparency? i dont think so.

a reply to: fencesitter85

Children below the age of 18 have a nearly 0 chance of dying. Matter of fact, the CDC has reported a total of 401 deaths below the age of 19. And 99% of those had compromised immunity.

a reply to: dragonridr

Not entirely true, but somewhat... The biggest difference is the data tracking over extended period of time which is required for standard FDA approved vaccines/drugs. More so, Phase I to Phase III clinical trials generally take at least 7 years for approval as they ensure to the safety of the toxicity of the drug. We have very little long term information on the effects of these particular mRNA vaccines which is the troubling aspect for me. Like I've stated before, the technology will be revolutionary... but it also can scramble your immune system.

a reply to: Bearack

Revolutionary is an understatement it will be able to kill cancer cells no matter where they are in the body by training are immune system to recognize them as a threat.
as far as testing its been going on for 2 decades these are not the first use of mRNA in humans. This is just the first time the technology matured enough to be used for vaccines.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Why is this not in the Hoax Bin.?

originally posted by: fencesitter85

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I stand more chance of being harmed by the jab than I do of covid killing me....same with my kids.

Get it if you want.....not my concern nor my problem.

Literally false. You're spreading fake news and propaganda. You're CNN.

What is the true CFR of COVID-19 ? Don’t give me the cdc number. Get a percentage of people who had it and did not know it. There are countless articles about people having just a cold and not thinking anything of it. Do we have the true CFR of COVID-19? What is the CFR with use of prophylactics like HCQ, or treatment with ivermectin.

Now take a close look at VAERs knowing there is a harsh legal penalty for reporting fraud. Do you see the 10000% increase in deaths reported correlating with the vaccine? Correlation does not mean causation, however with this dramatic increase in just 6 months using the “vaccines” it’s terribly concerning. You’re not being honest with yourself if you deny that. There are millions of adverse reactions. These mRNA “vaccines” by their very nature destroy healthy tissue in the body.

This is clearly not fake news for people to have this opinion, which is supported by 100s qualified medical doctors.

Look at the dat sets and compare them by risk group for both covid at different time intervals vs case number (which we know is not accurate because as much as 80% never knew they had COVID-19). The risk from damage from the vaccine compared to getting covid and fighting it off immediately is greater in certain risk groups.

If the cdc gave proper guidance to keep vitamin D3 levels high, get some sunshine, stay out of the state of fear (weakens immune system substantially), used ivermectin HCQ zinc and other therapeutics, we would not need the “vaccines”. When you’re in a state of fear, you are more willing to give up your freedoms. They want to keep you in a state of fear. Why?

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: HawkEyi

You misunderstood what emergency use does. All vaccines follow the same testing processes, whether they are approved for emergency use or through a typical license. What makes it faster is production can be started while in testing. Usually, the manufacturer would apply for a Biologics License Application (BLA). If the FDA determines that the vaccine is safe, works and that manufacturing can be done safely and consistently, it will grant a license for the vaccine.

In a public health emergency, manufacturing may occur while vaccines are still in development, rather than after approval. These efforts happen simultaneously, and instead of filing for a BLA, the manufacturer files for Emergency Use Authorization.

However the testing is exactly the same they have to go through each phase of the trials there is no diference. What is diferent is the government will reimburse a company for manufacturing costs if the drug fails it trials.

No trial vaccine study in history has been permitted to continue with more than 150 related participant deaths. There are officially more than 12,000 documented deaths related to the mRNA vaccines. 4x more deaths than 9-11. Also it's not even remotely true that there are no alternatives. Protein subunit COVID-19 vaccines exist which use established, safe and time tested technology and have been shown to be safer with fewer side effects and greater efficacy. We can't get those though because we're awash in unwanted murder shots. If the traditional jab were made available the justification for emergency use goes out the window and every agency with an attorney knows it. Just stop saying this is anything about vaccines and not about pushing mRNA for profit. The evidence proves otherwise.

originally posted by: fencesitter85

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I stand more chance of being harmed by the jab than I do of covid killing me....same with my kids.

Get it if you want.....not my concern nor my problem.

Literally false. You're spreading fake news and propaganda. You're CNN.

There’s less than 350 deaths merely involving covid in people under 18 in the United States.
We don’t know the totality of risk for minors and the vaccines yet, but it’s not fake news to take up the mindset that the vaccine could be worse than the virus for some

a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

I just checked your numbers are wrong so far CDC shows reporting that 6,207 (0.0018 percent) of individuals who received the vaccine had died. Do you even realize the number of people that have been vaccinated? 70 percent of the adult population in the united states there has never been a vaccine taken on this scale. They are doing 3 million shots per day since June! currently, us is at 163,312,474 vaccinated as of July 21st.

So the bottom line is on this scale even if there were 6207 deaths caused by the vaccine. This isn't true because anyone who dies that had the vaccine is reported. And not every death was caused by the vaccine in fact most were not but thats besides the point lets say they were. So far in the US 610,952 have died from Covid. So which side of this equation is it safer to be on?

originally posted by: PeteMitchell

originally posted by: fencesitter85

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I stand more chance of being harmed by the jab than I do of covid killing me....same with my kids.

Get it if you want.....not my concern nor my problem.

Literally false. You're spreading fake news and propaganda. You're CNN.

There’s less than 350 deaths merely involving covid in people under 18 in the United States.
We don’t know the totality of risk for minors and the vaccines yet, but it’s not fake news to take up the mindset that the vaccine could be worse than the virus for some

It could depend on the individual for most probably not but some individuals indeed could have a severe reaction but there odds of dying from it are less than dying from a car accident. This is a low risk compared to ones we take daily.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

I just checked your numbers are wrong so far CDC shows reporting that 6,207 (0.0018 percent) of individuals who received the vaccine had died. Do you even realize the number of people that have been vaccinated? 70 percent of the adult population in the united states there has never been a vaccine taken on this scale. They are doing 3 million shots per day since June! currently, us is at 163,312,474 vaccinated as of July 21st.

So the bottom line is on this scale even if there were 6207 deaths caused by the vaccine. This isn't true because anyone who dies that had the vaccine is reported. And not every death was caused by the vaccine in fact most were not but thats besides the point lets say they were. So far in the US 610,952 have died from Covid. So which side of this equation is it safer to be on?

Do you have any idea what percent of the actual VAERs represents?
Do you disagree that VAERS acts as an indicator?
610,952 people have not died of COVID-19. That number is incredibly overstated. And we have no idea what effects the vaccine will have because we only have 6 months of data compared to 3 times that for covid.

The point is, everyone has every right not to get this experimental medical treatment. Everyone should be able to choose. Millions if not billions have already been exposed to sarscov2 and have some form of natural immunity and therefore do not need to take this experimental medical treatment. The voracity these “vaccines” are being pushed on the entire human population is not only irresponsible, but unethical. It’s sick, and screams of an ulterior motive.

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: PeteMitchell

originally posted by: fencesitter85

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I stand more chance of being harmed by the jab than I do of covid killing me....same with my kids.

Get it if you want.....not my concern nor my problem.

Literally false. You're spreading fake news and propaganda. You're CNN.

There’s less than 350 deaths merely involving covid in people under 18 in the United States.
We don’t know the totality of risk for minors and the vaccines yet, but it’s not fake news to take up the mindset that the vaccine could be worse than the virus for some

It could depend on the individual for most probably not but some individuals indeed could have a severe reaction but there odds of dying from it are less than dying from a car accident. This is a low risk compared to ones we take daily.

What’s The odds of dying prior to the average lifespan when you’re diagnosed with myocarditis at 11 years old caused by said vaccine because your risk of the disease was statistically 0?