Covid-19 Vaccine Complications Are Increasing - Would You Neutralize Your Vaccination if Possible.

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: carewemust

Absolutely Not!

I have absolutely NO FEAR regarding the vaccine I took, and I am thankful that I took it as soon as I was able.

I have had no unexpected side effects (experienced a few hours of low-grade fever with first shot and a few hours of fatigue with second, as well as a sore arm for two days as is usual with any intramuscular injection), nor do I show any sign of side effects likely to develop.

Furthermore, I will gladly take a booster shot in the future, if it is determined that one is recommended (I had the Moderna vaccine, for which a booster shot has not yet been determined to be necessary).

Have you heard about Moderna’s new 6-inch suppository?

originally posted by: musicismagic
Japan, well I tried to find out news about the side effects here , and guess what. NOTHING on the net that I can find.
Just this : thediplomat.com...

That's not censorship, it's more or less accurate.

A lot of what we hear about vaccine side effects or harm is flat out fake new from anti vaxxers.

Outside of Africa and a few Islamic countries anti vaxx sentiment is extremely low and is mostly an American thing.

And what sentiment there is outside of the US usually involves accusing America of trying to sterilise black women.

You cannot trust a lot of news sources claiming that the vaccine 3us dangerous. If it was even half as bad as BitChute claim then the would be hundreds of thousands of deaths.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
Something I wrote on another thread...

Funny isn't it how it's all the politicians and their 'scientific advisors' that have kept 'flip-flopping' with so called 'advice' over the whole debacle before the vaccines, and now they are just as 'confused' over the vaccine.
The only people, aka scientists and doctors, that have held the line, not digressed once from their academic knowledge and years, nay decades as virologists, immunologists et all, are the ones the MSM/Social Media/Govenrment etc are 'silencing' by removing them from 'platforms'. These include scientists who have Nobel Prizes for their research and Dr's who have hands on experience either in lethal viral out breaks or in Clinic/Hospital settings.
If the jab, let alone all the 'flip flopping' during the initial stages were so 'science based' and correct, then why do they censor the other scientists and not have a transparent and open debate about it if they think 'they and their team' are so right?
That tells me all I need to know personally for the decisions I make for myself.

Rainbows
Jane

So are you saying scientists who have developed other vaccines, scientists who have researched and found solutions to other viruses, scientists who have 'hands on experience' at dealing with previous viral outbreaks are talking s**t and nonsense and get 'censored' for their advice and knowledge are not worth at least listening to?

As to your comment about ...

If it was even half as bad as BitChute claim then the would be hundreds of thousands of deaths.

I would add "yet". All these other Dr's are saying it is just a matter of time.

There were no lists of adverse reactions to any of the vaccines BEFORE the world wide roll out. All we kept hearing was it is safe. Now we are told the "benefits outweigh the risks" as adverse reactions come to light. Where was the list of contraindications to any medications people are already on? Where was the list of underlying health issues which would be contraindicated to getting the jab? There weren't any because they had never completed the investigations/research.

A lot of what we hear about vaccine side effects or harm is flat out fake new from anti vaxxers.

Wrong, just completely wrong.

a reply to: slatesteam

I'd describe a lot of the posts about supposed killer vaccine in much the same terms.

a reply to: angelchemuel

It's mostly lies made up by anti vaxxers or for ad revenue.

There are minimal side effects, and most are in line with all other vaccines. An extremely small percentage of people have clotting problems but most of them survive with few lasting effects. You have more chance of being struck by lightning than being injured by a covid vaccine.

We've got a bunch of anti vaxxers, Sjw and never Trumpers making things up, plus the usual fake new doom porn people fishing for clicks.

Haven't you wonders why these stories only seem to happen in the English language media, or in places like Pakistan where they're just reposting old fake content from polio campaigns.

Why aren't Vietnamese or Taiwanese getting these side effects, or the Irish?

What issues are there with the Sputnik vaccine, any ideas?

I've not seen much about it.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: angelchemuel

It's mostly lies made up by anti vaxxers or for ad revenue.

There are minimal side effects, and most are in line with all other vaccines. An extremely small percentage of people have clotting problems but most of them survive with few lasting effects. You have more chance of being struck by lightning than being injured by a covid vaccine.

We've got a bunch of anti vaxxers, Sjw and never Trumpers making things up, plus the usual fake new doom porn people fishing for clicks.

Haven't you wonders why these stories only seem to happen in the English language media, or in places like Pakistan where they're just reposting old fake content from polio campaigns.

Why aren't Vietnamese or Taiwanese getting these side effects, or the Irish?

a reply to: carewemust

No, I wouldn't neutralise it. Like everyone else who has been vaccinated on ATS, I have no side effects beyond the days following both jabs. Also I have heard no 1st hand accounts of bad side effects, can't say the same for Covid-19 though...

a reply to: paraphi

I am happy to be fully vaccinated. I know Covid is real. I have good grasp of the science. I take aspirin for headaches too.

I very rarely get headaches, and only take aspirin / Tylenol a few times a year if I get a cold that is in my cold medicine.

Who’s body is better off…..

It seems dose and duration are what cause the problems. So what are the long term complications of a drug that tricks your body making a spike protein by changing your rna?

Supposedly covid is strong? Calling for strong medicine. Strong medicine always has side effects. Being young and healthy, and evidently not having caught covid (I tested negative when I was sick a few days in February) I’ll pass on the vaccine. For me. The risk to my rna is not worth it.

How do human livers like spiked proteins…. Does it matter the source?

originally posted by: HawkEyi
I really wish you should have done more research.

Thnak you for your concern. I think that I make educated choices. I also know that people make uneducated choices.

There is alot of vaccine "research" going on which is utter rubbish. The industry of anti-science.

a reply to: musicismagic

Duck Duck Go sucks, you should be using Q Want instead.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

A lot of what we hear about vaccine side effects or harm is flat out fake new from anti vaxxers.

Really, perhaps Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines) used in coronavirus vaccines is an anti vaxxer....

a reply to: djz3ro

Nearly every one in my surrounding had side effect of the vaccine and none ever got covid19. Personal experience are personal experience... If you value yours, other will values theirs.

a reply to: glend

The spike argument is a bit strange, since if you get covid19... well you get the spike also. The question is how much an advantage is it and why they keep saying it's without danger. Like I told many time I was split for my age group, until they threatened my freedom. Now I'm against, but it's more a moral decision.

I'd take a look into his claims that he actually invented mRNA vaccines.

That claim is somewhat in dispute.

originally posted by: glend
a reply to: AaarghZombies

A lot of what we hear about vaccine side effects or harm is flat out fake new from anti vaxxers.

Really, perhaps Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines) used in coronavirus vaccines is an anti vaxxer....

a reply to: aTechnician

Guessing... covid-19 spike protein remains with the virus assembly, Whereas with the vaccines, it can become unstuck, circulate through the blood stream damaging tissue's.

With bio distribution peaking in the ovaries. One wonders why there???

a reply to: glend

Well if they were doing their job right we would have an answer for that question... but they didn't. It's their job to show the safety of their vaccine and not the other to evaluate the danger. Many people try to reverse the burden of the proof, and yeah, the laboratories are much smaller than those of the big pharma (slower, less reputable and sometime sketchy)...

a reply to: nonspecific

Shoot the messenger, really!

His 1989 paper in which he described a method in which RNA is encapsulated in positively charged lipids in order to force the RNA into cells is here. Regardless if its disputed or not, he is undoutaly an expert in the field.

There's a pretty big difference between someone who contributed making claims and someone who contributed claiming they invented mRNA vaccines and making claims.

originally posted by: glend
a reply to: nonspecific

Shoot the messenger, really!

His 1989 paper in which he described a method in which RNA is encapsulated in positively charged lipids in order to force the RNA into cells is here. Regardless if its disputed or not, he is undoutaly an expert in the field.

originally posted by: aTechnician
a reply to: glend

Well if they were doing their job right we would have an answer for that question... but they didn't. It's their job to show the safety of their vaccine and not the other to evaluate the danger. Many people try to reverse the burden of the proof, and yeah, the laboratories are much smaller than those of the big pharma (slower, less reputable and sometime sketchy)...

I want to add that the publishing process is hard and that many parties are involved in the process. So a small, less reputable lab might just get rejected because one of the reviewer doesn't agree with the findings and want more proof. So the process repeat.

Few of my papers still are into review and I sent them 6 month ago. Yeah, a paper that doesn't speak about anything medical, take 6 month to get reviewed and accepted... I can't believe they pass the vaccine quicker than my publications and have to front to say they did everything right.

a reply to: aTechnician

At the very begining they might have been projecting world wide death tolls of 100+ million people. So you can imagine the urgency to roll out a vaccine to save millions of lives. On top of that is the enormous profit potential of the vaccines. pfizer made 3.5 billion in revenue in the first three months of rollot. Wouldn't surpize if some of that money made it into the back pockets of officials.

Good luck with your papers.