It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: olaru12
God's will is always executed. Lindell is just stating the obvious.
If trump isn't reinstated on Aug.13 then it must be GODs will that Biden is the actual "chosen one" eh.?
anyone who can campaign from his basement and only take pre-approved questions from those in the press that were given the questions to ask is quite obviously the "chose one".
As you should know, campaigns are just entertaining media events anyway, meaning nothing. Presidents aren't elected , they are "chosen" by wall street and the military industrial complex, on a country club golf course in Anaheim, Calif. They seem to be a capricious lot...huh?
I love political campaigns. I have worked on 3...2 for the libertarians, 1 for the GOP; Looking forward to the midterms, someone has to shoot and grip/gaff that BS. All union gigs.
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: olaru12
If trump isn't reinstated on Aug.13 then it must be GODs will that Biden is the actual "chosen one" eh.?
Yup! But chosen for what???
The Lord works in mysterious ways, His wonders to behold.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: olaru12
If trump isn't reinstated on Aug.13 then it must be GODs will that Biden is the actual "chosen one" eh.?
Yup! But chosen for what???
The Lord works in mysterious ways, His wonders to behold.
Yes Ma'am, copy that!
It looks like the pillowman along with plenty of other rightwingers are using GOD like they use "Q" Alex Jones, and Tucker C. as disseminators of the Holy Word.
Mysterious ways indeed!
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: olaru12
If trump isn't reinstated on Aug.13 then it must be GODs will that Biden is the actual "chosen one" eh.?
Yup! But chosen for what???
The Lord works in mysterious ways, His wonders to behold.
Yes Ma'am, copy that!
It looks like the pillowman along with plenty of other rightwingers are using GOD like they use "Q" Alex Jones, and Tucker C. as disseminators of the Holy Word.
Mysterious ways indeed!
Look at that.
democrats are so out of ways to smear AZ Audit, that they are now down to religion insults.
I'd ask if you have no shame.
But democrats have already made that clear.
Trump and Pillowman are fighting epic candyland battle for top bunk here.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: olaru12
If trump isn't reinstated on Aug.13 then it must be GODs will that Biden is the actual "chosen one" eh.?
Yup! But chosen for what???
The Lord works in mysterious ways, His wonders to behold.
Yes Ma'am, copy that!
It looks like the pillowman along with plenty of other rightwingers are using GOD like they use "Q" Alex Jones, and Tucker C. as disseminators of the Holy Word.
Mysterious ways indeed!
Look at that.
democrats are so out of ways to smear AZ Audit, that they are now down to religion insults.
I'd ask if you have no shame.
But democrats have already made that clear.
Trump and Pillowman are fighting epic candyland battle for top bunk here.
Just so you know, I'm not a demb! I've been a Libertarian since Gov. Gary Johnson hired me to work on his presidential campaign back in 2012.
August is right around the corner, the proud boiz and Boogalooers must be getting excited for the festivities. Perhaps another Jan6 is in store for the faithful.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Boadicea
I call it how I see it.
If an unbiased group was doing an actual audit and presented evidence of fraud, then I would believe something fishy is going on.
What CyberNinjas is doing is a circus, a charade and a far cry from an audit. If they come out and say they found of evidence of fraud, their business is ruined. The people who are paying for this audit, the 'Stop the Steal' crowd want to see a report that stroke their confirmation bias and they will get what they paid for...sort of.
As a previous poster said, they need time to put a spin on the final report. They need time to test the wording to various focus groups to make sure the get the right catchy phrases....the same way the infamous phrases "Drain the Swamp" and "Stop the Steal" became so popular.
That said, if you and your echo chamber were so concerned about exposing fraud, why do you only focus on areas where Trump lost?
Lets say a similar audit was conducted in Florida funded by 'liberal' causes and they found that widespread fraud helped Trump won, would you accept the results?
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
That is a poor argument. You are really dense if that is all you see.
You have to be dense if you think all Democrats are bad.....there are many Democrats who work hard to help others and make the country a better place, as there are Republicans who do the same....yet both sides have those who are corrupt to the core.
The divide and conquer technique has worked flawlessly on you....if all you got is Democrats/liberal bad, Republicans good.
originally posted by: jrod
There already has been a full audit and hand recount all of Arizona's ballots(and many other states), nothing suspicious was found, what was found was more people voted for Biden than Trump, conclusively!
This so called audit is completely unnecessary. The fact that is done by a group that fully believes Trump won and the election was stolen due to fraud(bias) and they are funded by folks who believe the same thing(more bias) that are under pressure by their customers to find some of evidence of fraud makes this open to corruption. Also the fact there is no transparency nor are any legitimate media being allowed to document the process makes this highly suspect.
Any reasonable person can see the recipe for fraudulently reporting they found fraud here. Those who can not grasp the conflict of interests are frankly too dense to reason with.
Thats kinda what Im saying! They had the facts. Thats a very plausible explanation for them both risking their reputations. And they HAD to know that it was a very big claim carrying very big risk. They didnt both go just crazy and dream it all up!
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
Both Rudy and Sydney had very good reputations and success before these accusations made against Dominion. Im still baffled why they risked their reputations so. They were convinced. Hopefully, we will know someday.
originally posted by: Scrutinizing
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Scrutinizing
...that woman...
I believe you are referring to Sidney Powell and her kracken -- yes? And I'm with you there. Not just her, but Guiliani as well. Their efforts never set quite right to me. More than once I had to raise an eyebrow and wonder "what the hell are they thinking???"
I still wonder if their efforts were genuine...
Yes, that's her, you're right, and kracken, too, sorry that I like to play around with goofball words. A further absurdity is that kracken would indicate some overwhelming, slam dunk, dead to rights case, flashing neon, too. There are all sorts of partisan judges and the like, but that no court has found the evidence worthy of pursuing speaks for itself, and, as you point out, Giuliani as well, as much as I admire his record of service and achievements on the law and order front. I have thought at least Giuliani is sincere, not without precedent a man of honest intent got royally hoodwinked, like Colin Powell at the U.N. In any case, you hit the nail on the head for a thinking person, competent to serve on a jury, that it's, "Who knows?" Truth is truth, wherever it leads, whatever the case, truth the only thing of value. I can only speak for myself, but I'm conservative, this having nothing to do with being a partisan hack. I hate all liars.
Maybe they didn't risk their reputation. Maybe they had facts and the facts were never looked at. That would make the ones not wanting the facts to come out pushing an agenda to ruin their reputation. To hide their culpability. Nobody seems to think about it in that manner.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
This is NOT a forensic audit, despite what CyberNinjas, my pillow Guy and Trump say. Sorry but you have been duped if you actually think this a legitimate forensic audit.
It is just a fancy word that makes stupid people think this is something it is not....what you think they are going do, take fingerprints and DNA off a 'suspect' ballot and match it with the voter?
originally posted by: jrod
If the OP and others who this so called audit would come out and say, I can understand why those of us capable of thinking have our doubts about the CyberNinjas because their lack of experience doing this kind of audit, or they might be biased based on their support for Trump and their belief of election fraud, or they maybe bias because their customers (the people paying them for this) want them to find something I would have some more respect for the OP and others that support this....instead they just ignore the legitimate questions reasonable have about this and spin whatever myself and others write into some sort of childish debate, taking quotes out of context and using all sorts of debate tactics to cast doubt on myself and others instead of addressing the flaws of this audit and the CyberNinjas group.