It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: joejack1949
a reply to: InachMarbank
It kinda sounds like you and your boys had a mild case of covid-19. Did your wife and daughter also have a sore throat and loss of smell?
originally posted by: InachMarbank
What do you know about using chemicals and enzymes to transcribe E Coli into viral RNA? My guess is not much. Me neither...
That sounds like some kind of virus cloning technology or something... And the efficacy rates of 95%... That sounds about as effective at triggering antibodies as catching the damn disease..
nothing says "crazy" like someone who believes in COVID conspiracies
originally posted by: InachMarbank
It contains viral RNA.
Can you find any solid claims that this viral RNA doesn't replicate??? I can't.
I have been searching and I find plenty of scientific literature that says RNA replicates.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
You disputed my claim with anecdotal evidence saying your friends didn't experience anosmia from the MRNA vaccine.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
Even if I test positive for COVID 19, that will not prove my opinion.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
I checked ALL VAERS data for USA yesterday and there are have been more than 1500 complaints of anosmia reported.
originally posted by: EvilAxis
a reply to: Jimy718
The author of the opinion piece you quoted has drastically misrepresented the MIT paper he's citing. The paper does not show that the vaccines alter DNA. It does suggest (as has an earlier study) that Covid-19, like some other viruses, may insert genetic material into human chromosomes.
Another reason to avoid the virus, not the vaccine.
originally posted by: Madviking
a reply to: St0rD
The shocking lack of recognition of natural immunity for Covid, is a red flag for me.
Up until 2020, countless medical articles talked about natural immunity for most diseases meeting the following criteria:
1) As good or often better than vaccines
2) Usually lasting long-term and in some cases, for life
3) Contributing to herd immunity
4) Vaccines are only superior in providing immunity without having to go through the risk of severe illness
Suddenly, under Covid, none of this is true. Media is citing "experts" as a monolith as saying that they don't think covid immunity lasts, despite virtually all studies showing Covid antibodies lasting, and natural immunity not being sufficient. They've been utterly silent on natural immunity's contribution to herd immunity.
PSA: until the advent of modern vaccines, ALL herd immunity was created via naturally acquired immunity.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
a reply to: EvilAxis
So the RNA replicates, and the RNA gets your body to make SARS COV2 protein.
Even if the RNA cant make a whole virus, that doesn't really counter my point that the illness which the RNA and protein can cause, can be contagious.
Also, the VAERS data is likely to be underreported IMO, because the loved ones of the deceased are not likely to admit they made a mistake by taking the vaccine.
originally posted by: Jimy718
Yes, I know the MIT paper doesn't show the vaccine mRNA altering DNA, the author was quick to point this out. He continues to show an analogous method through which mRNA may alter One's DNA.