It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RussianSpy
a reply to: nonspecific
I have nothing against approved vaccines, I've voted for both sides in the past as well.
What I am against though is being experimented on over an excessively NON-lethal virus that humans manipulated in the first place via gain of function research.
To each their own but if you buy into this farce who knows where it ends? Turn off the news and live your life, let people who enjoy having freedoms akin to North Korea live in their little bubbles like the wimps they are.
originally posted by: RussianSpy
a reply to: nonspecific
I have nothing against approved vaccines, I've voted for both sides in the past as well.
What I am against though is being experimented on over an excessively NON-lethal virus that humans manipulated in the first place via gain of function research.
To each their own but if you buy into this farce who knows where it ends? Turn off the news and live your life, let people who enjoy having freedoms akin to North Korea live in their little bubbles like the wimps they are.
originally posted by: Salander
Did you know that the human immune system can be strengthened in many ways, especially with good nutrition?
originally posted by: Salander
Did you know that natural immunity is far superior to any offered by a vaccine?
originally posted by: Salander
Did you know that these current shots are not vaccines at all?
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: EvilAxis
Well yes, a compromised undernourished immune system was implied. That's rather the point.
Early on last year some data showed many of the infected had deficiency in Vitamin D and other nutrients.
Of course many facilities were too busy to test for vitamin or mineral deficiencies.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
The study shows this MRNA vaccine caused the growth SARS COV2 proteins in the blood stream for 5 days after the first shot. How is that different than catching the SARS COV2 virus which causes the growth of SARS COV2 protein in your blood stream?
originally posted by: InachMarbank
The SARS COV2 protein hardly seems like an entirely benign antigen. It causes a pretty painful immune response. Today I literally can't smell sh##.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
If this vaccine was an inactivated virus, like the Rabies vaccine, I probably wouldn't be so negative.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
I have not found anywhere that says this vaccine is supplementing your body with antibodies.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
Where have you found information that says the virus can replicate outside the body as you suggest? Everything I have read says it can only replicate in your body.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
If SARS COV2 proteins are entirely inactivated in the body, then you are saying this virus isn't contagious. I don't think that's true.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: InachMarbank
That is an interesting story you tell regarding the uninjected living in close quarters with the injected. I've heard similar stories, and am concerned about them because I am uninjected and must, from time to time, be in close proximity to the injected.
For that reason I no longer shake hands with the injected, and do my best to remain socially distant from them.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
However the GAVI propaganda you forwarded seems to conflict with what you said, that they contain a non-infectious, non-replicating viral vector.
From GAVI...
"One type of virus that has often been used as a vector is adenovirus, which causes the common cold. As with nucleic acid vaccines, our own cellular machinery is hijacked to produce the antigen"
I thought the common cold was contagious. Can you please clarify?
Various viruses have been developed as vectors, including adenovirus (a cause of the common cold), measles virus and vaccinia virus. These vectors are stripped of any disease-causing genes and sometimes also genes that can enable them to replicate, meaning they are now harmless. The genetic instructions for making the antigen from the target pathogen are stitched into the virus vector’s genome.
The COVID-19 viral vector vaccines under development use non-replicating viral vectors.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
I remain highly certain that the MRNA vaccines my wife and daughter took 7 days apart from each other have infected all the members of our household, including the 3 of us who never took them. The illnesses experienced by me and my sons have come in 2 separate waves of symptoms. We get a sore throat, then it gets flushed out. Then 7 days later the same thing happens. For me the 2nd wave was worse. That's probably because my wife got jabbed 7 days after my daughter, and I sleep in the same bed as my wife.
Loss of smell is a tell tale sign of COVID 19. Today my sense of smell has come back somewhat. But it's not at 100% yet. Let's hope tomorrow is not worse than today.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
Given this personal experience, and considering the vaccine appears to be synthesized viral genetic material, RNA, I would say these vaccines are highly contagious. We can probably say everybody in the world has now been infected by the coronavirus which causes COVID 19.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
Doesn't sound like the viral vector vaccines are contagious.
originally posted by: InachMarbank
But the MRNA vaccines most certainly are.