It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SideEyeEverything
a reply to: crankyoldman
Well this won't age well..
www.politico.com...
originally posted by: cimmerius
originally posted by: carewemust
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
Maybe one of our resident doctors would like to opine on this. It sounds like potentially dangerous advice to me.
As a layman, I am very skeptical of introducing any foreign substance into the lungs. The lungs are very sensitive and only “designed” to breath clean air. Anything else runs the risk of being irritating or harmful.
Right in this thread we have discussed the dangers of chemicals in household cleaners. I wouldn’t inhale Lysol to kill germs any more than I would inhale insecticide to kill parasites.
Granted, with almost any medication there is a cost-benefit trade-off.
But Lysol is a harsh chemical not intended for human consumption. I doubt the ingredients are even listed as completely as required on a food item.
I understand treatment options are limited when the medical establishment is not forthcoming. But if one insists on self-doctoring, it seems like Ivermectin would be a better option, even though harder to find. It is at least designed for human consumption and has been tested as such.
Inhaling Lysol is not a good idea in my opinion.
.
originally posted by: cimmerius
originally posted by: carewemust
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
Maybe one of our resident doctors would like to opine on this. It sounds like potentially dangerous advice to me.
As a layman, I am very skeptical of introducing any foreign substance into the lungs. The lungs are very sensitive and only “designed” to breath clean air. Anything else runs the risk of being irritating or harmful.
Right in this thread we have discussed the dangers of chemicals in household cleaners. I wouldn’t inhale Lysol to kill germs any more than I would inhale insecticide to kill parasites.
Granted, with almost any medication there is a cost-benefit trade-off.
But Lysol is a harsh chemical not intended for human consumption. I doubt the ingredients are even listed as completely as required on a food item.
I understand treatment options are limited when the medical establishment is not forthcoming. But if one insists on self-doctoring, it seems like Ivermectin would be a better option, even though harder to find. It is at least designed for human consumption and has been tested as such.
Inhaling Lysol is not a good idea in my opinion.
.
originally posted by: Thoughtful1
a reply to: crankyoldman
We may need to reinvent the written word as in real books with print that cannot be censored. That brings up Fahrenheit 451 but we can hide them and some of us memorize an entire book.
originally posted by: steaming
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
I say Doc, did I hear safe Water ??
or ........
fdas-list-of-toxic-hand-sanitizers-grows-to-75-here-are-the-brands-to-avoid
people.com...
Chink, chink.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
I am invoking the DJT rule. Anyone who ever met with this guy must be investigated by everyone and anyone and must be destroyed.
Not related.
With Ukrainian Defense Minister Lt. Col. Vindman.
Although David insists the report does not indicate any wrongdoing on his behalf, the findings indicate after his tenure as counselor to Cuomo, that he kept the personnel file for an employee within the office accusing the governor of sexual misconduct, then assisted in efforts to leak that file to the media in an attempt to discredit her.
Further, the report finds David allegedly said he would help find individuals to sign their names to a draft op-ed that sought to discredit the survivor, but went unpublished, although he wouldn’t sign the document himself. Also, the report indicates David was involved in the discussions about another staffer secretly calling and recording a call between a former staffer and another survivor in a separate effort to smear her.
originally posted by: RookQueen
a reply to: carewemust
Sometimes it feels like they aren't thinking things through to the end. It as if they believe their own BS and have completely bought into communism and socialism but they do truly know how to pull it off. They've read the socialism manifesto and the communist manifesto but the don't really know how to use them, therefore they are accomplishing nothing that will get them re-elected, that how I see it. They don't seem to be good with numbers.....we do out number them. Especially after all of the Coivd hijinks and lies!
originally posted by: RookQueen
a reply to: angelchemuel
I hope this is true. We need more people doing this more often. People with jobs like this that are harder to replace due to intense long training that comes with getting certified. I can think ok a long list of people with these positions here are a few please add to it if you come up with more. Maybe we could get them to boycott until we are told the truth.
Air Controlers
Airplane Mechanics
Train Driver's
Bus Drivers
Heavy equipment operators
Doctors and all health care worker
Attorneys
Local judgesThere will be more after I put some though into it.
Firemen
EMT's
I doubt many have read any socialist manifesto or communist manifesto.
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine.