It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Shills love the original "what has Q predicted" talking point, of course at the time the talking point was created the non-linear aspect was not understood by them and they simply can't get off the original talking points at all. Rinse and Repeat.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: Caled
I know this is a newb question, but what is the origin of the "Q clock" and what are we trying to engineer here? I have some thoughts, but I'm trying to figure out what we are working with.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Sufi, I just realized regarding the wheels within a wheel concept, if you had a fixed outer wheel with gears, and then three cogs within, each of smaller size, and you lined them up at any of the marker numbers with arrows on the cogs pointing at the marker number, each time the largest inner cog moves one way or the other all of the arrows will start pointing directly at different Q drops in alternating directions, similar to your circular chess board idea you had awhile back. Maybe this could be used to chain different drops together to form larger, more informative drops?
Cal, fun fact about the Q-clock and this thread. Evilwulf designed the one we see. I found it very shortly after it was created and posted it - knowing nothing of it or its purpose. A very short while later EW popped in here, saying something like "speak of me and I come..." Then vanished, as did his/their webpage hosting the clock.
Shortly thereafter the clock took on a life of its own, and, has proved to be valuable in the "Future Proves Past" aspect of this process. Really another way of finding connections showing there is The Plan by showing us at the time that The Map is non linear, ergo, dates and times are less important then connections of topics, names, issues etc. Yet, they are tied together in an organized fashion that shows a linear aspect, not not as we perceive it.
Shills love the original "what has Q predicted" talking point, of course at the time the talking point was created the non-linear aspect was not understood by them and they simply can't get off the original talking points at all. Rinse and Repeat.
originally posted by: Caled
I know this is a newb question, but what is the origin of the "Q clock" and what are we trying to engineer here? I have some thoughts, but I'm trying to figure out what we are working with.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Sufi, I just realized regarding the wheels within a wheel concept, if you had a fixed outer wheel with gears, and then three cogs within, each of smaller size, and you lined them up at any of the marker numbers with arrows on the cogs pointing at the marker number, each time the largest inner cog moves one way or the other all of the arrows will start pointing directly at different Q drops in alternating directions, similar to your circular chess board idea you had awhile back. Maybe this could be used to chain different drops together to form larger, more informative drops?
Cyprus plans to launch a register in coming months identifying the owners of thousands of companies on the island, lifting a veil of secrecy on opaque and complex corporate structures that campaigners say can help criminals seeking to hide their loot.
Details of thousands of companies domiciled on the island, many thought to have Russian links, will be collected from March 16 to be entered in a so-called Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) register.
originally posted by: Caled
Has anyone figured out why it ended up as a clock?
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: Caled
I know this is a newb question, but what is the origin of the "Q clock" and what are we trying to engineer here? I have some thoughts, but I'm trying to figure out what we are working with.
originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Sufi, I just realized regarding the wheels within a wheel concept, if you had a fixed outer wheel with gears, and then three cogs within, each of smaller size, and you lined them up at any of the marker numbers with arrows on the cogs pointing at the marker number, each time the largest inner cog moves one way or the other all of the arrows will start pointing directly at different Q drops in alternating directions, similar to your circular chess board idea you had awhile back. Maybe this could be used to chain different drops together to form larger, more informative drops?
Cal, fun fact about the Q-clock and this thread. Evilwulf designed the one we see. I found it very shortly after it was created and posted it - knowing nothing of it or its purpose. A very short while later EW popped in here, saying something like "speak of me and I come..." Then vanished, as did his/their webpage hosting the clock.
Shortly thereafter the clock took on a life of its own, and, has proved to be valuable in the "Future Proves Past" aspect of this process. Really another way of finding connections showing there is The Plan by showing us at the time that The Map is non linear, ergo, dates and times are less important then connections of topics, names, issues etc. Yet, they are tied together in an organized fashion that shows a linear aspect, not not as we perceive it.
Shills love the original "what has Q predicted" talking point, of course at the time the talking point was created the non-linear aspect was not understood by them and they simply can't get off the original talking points at all. Rinse and Repeat.
originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
originally posted by: steaming
[ Concepts such as deindustrialisation and sustainability, the prioritising of nature over man, the deceleration of economic life, the importance of overcoming the urge towards progress and consumerism, the view of humankind as a reckless species that overpopulates the world and selfishly exploits its resources, and whose impact on the planet must therefore be reduced… all of this thinking has been around for decades, and is clearly formulated in the ideology of environmentalism and climate protection. ]
The truth about ‘the great reset’
Fixed your link and another quote from it...
To oppose this new form of authoritarianism, it will take more than a Twitterstorm against the WEF and other heralds of a post-pandemic ‘new era’. What society needs are alternatives to this green-wrapped doctrine of stagnation. Such alternatives will not be created in backrooms, or strategy papers or in wild theories about WEF plots, but rather in open, free debate.
I'll bet their so-called reset plan does go back to 1954 and the Club of Rome; the ideology & dark magick behind it all can be traced back to early 1900s in the US and even further back to the British Empire and German industrialists, occult philosophers in brotherhoods of Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, and Eastern mysticism. It all plays a role on where we are today, imo.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: c9daa0 No.7958 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:52:55 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 0c0027 No.7935 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:50:17 (EST)
>>7930
Does this mean Ronald Reagan, Q?
>>7935
Timestamp.
Decipher.
Think clock.
Wind the clock w/ all markers.
Relevant.
Future proves past.
Q
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f946c4 No.21439 📁
Jan 7 2018 23:01:24 (EST)
IMPORTANT:
Do you understand what just occurred?
POTUS Tweets [15 min] between.
POTUS missing "Q" in select word.
DEFCON [1] POST HERE
POTUS mods Tweets [1 min] between.
POTUS adds "Q" in select word.
This was not meant to signify AUTH / established.
This is to train you how to understand the correlation between posts and Tweets.
Future proves past.
Wind the CLOCK.
The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.
Feel privileged - POTUS just spoke to this board [P_pers]
We serve at the pleasure of the President.
Q
originally posted by: underpass61
Oprah doing the royal interview
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: c9daa0 No.7958 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:52:55 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 0c0027 No.7935 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:50:17 (EST)
>>7930
Does this mean Ronald Reagan, Q?
>>7935
Timestamp.
Decipher.
Think clock.
Wind the clock w/ all markers.
Relevant.
Future proves past.
Q
originally posted by: underpass61
Oprah doing the royal interview
originally posted by: kreinhard
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Idyllic.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
Couldn't that just be a battery for the wireless mic?
originally posted by: underpass61
Oprah doing the royal interview
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
cranky, I've been so blind... let's revisit #477
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: c9daa0 No.7958 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:52:55 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 0c0027 No.7935 📁
Jan 6 2018 15:50:17 (EST)
>>7930
Does this mean Ronald Reagan, Q?
>>7935
Timestamp.
Decipher.
Think clock.
Wind the clock w/ all markers.
Relevant.
Future proves past.
Q
MARKERS = 0, 1, 5, 10, 15
This post timestamp = Jan 6 2018 15:52:55!
Could this be saying to wind the time by MARKERS 15, 10 and 5 because:
15 Hours = 15 Marker... simple as!
52 Mins = 10 Marker because 5x2 = 10
55 Seconds = 5 Marker because 55 = 5 seconds backwards from 00
Then we are left with MARKERs 0 and 1:
3 Year DELTA = 1 Marker wound 3 times
2 Year DELTA = 1 Marker wound 2 times
1 Year DELTA = 1 Marker wound 1 time
and Month/Day use 0 Marker because the stay the same to form the Year DELTAs!
I suggest we look for timestamp differences BACKWARDS or FORWARDS of:
HOURS +/- 15
MINS +/- 10
SECONDS +/- 5
Not sure if this only applies to 1/2/3 Year Deltas of a post to PREDICT an action date?