It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Raw video footage entering and the 2nd largest Pyramid of Giza (commonly referred to as the 'Pyramid of Khafre' (which is only 30ft smaller than the Great Pyramid of Giza). One of the most fascinating, and unique details about this structure is that the entire internal layout is carved ENTIRELY from BEDROCK (minus the large roof slabs within the so-called Kings/Queen's chamber). This is much different than that of the Great Pyramid, which is entirely made up of stone blocks. This video was filmed in December, 2020
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: SecretKnowledge
That is incredible to see from the inside... I honestly did not know some of these pyramids have passages in carved out bedrock...
it does raise the question of the exterior pyramid structure and its purpose.
Power plant is a common theory.
I've also been fascinated with things like obelisks, Stonehendge etc. and wonder if the ancient world committed so much energy and resources into these monoliths for a greater purpose
originally posted by: Slichter
This was big science of the day with amazing GPS accuracy.
When we get to the Sphinx and the 26,000 year cycle there might even be some star alignment predictions.
originally posted by: Mark98SS
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: SecretKnowledge
Why the politics?
originally posted by: Slichter
a reply to: Byrd
Same excuse they gave for calculus, the printing press hadn't been invented.
Ironically the internet has left many with too many authorities to chose from.
originally posted by: Brassmonkey
You know what has always fascinated me is how these pyramids were built. The traditional archeological story is that hundreds of thousands of slaves used huge ramps that were at very slightly larger angles to move the huge 5 ton rocks over a mile and these Pyramids took 100 years to build.
But a lot of Archeologists are befuddled about the fact that these hundreds of thousands of slaves did not leave any evidence of them living on site for 100 years in the sand way below the sand like utensils, clay pots. Usually when that many people live somewhere they leave something that showed they lived there. The people had to have kids and wives and relatives that lived there.
Thoughts?