-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - 34 -

originally posted by: texasgirl
a reply to: crankyoldman

I saw this earlier, Cranky, so I went back into the inauguration videos to the Arlington Cemetery one. There were 3 cannons there but only two were firing. And yes, they were 10 seconds apart.

I also don’t remember hearing a gun salute after Biden was sworn in.

Wow...

TG, these little things add up. If none of it matters then I, cranky, have been knighted by the Queen, please call me Sir. Matters not if I've met her or not or done the ritual, I say it is done. Each little piece of irregularity, no matter how small, shows us something.

Soldiers, unless told not to do so by their commanding officer, are required to salute any officer as they pass. POTUS is the leader of the Armed forces. Yes, they normally would salute and the troops couldn't get away with turning their back. Discipline and tradition says they are to show respect their commanders at all times.

originally posted by: panoz77

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I have been thinking about the video of the soldiers turning their backs to the Biden motorcade and the Marines did not salute when he walked into the White House that combined with the fact that he was inaugurated early before the correct time I and that the Secret Service box is missing from his desk perhaps adds up to the fact that he is not really the president after all and being puppeteered by a military junta.
Generally I thought if a soldier a group of soldiers were disrespectful to the commander in chief like that they would be up for a court-martial.

What is the military coup actually happen and they're using Joe as a puppet to maintain order

Do marines salute to POTUS first or as a response to POTUS saluting to them? Need to find some Trump footage of getting on to the chopper or AF1.

Looks to me like the marines salute POTUS.

originally posted by: panoz77

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I have been thinking about the video of the soldiers turning their backs to the Biden motorcade and the Marines did not salute when he walked into the White House that combined with the fact that he was inaugurated early before the correct time I and that the Secret Service box is missing from his desk perhaps adds up to the fact that he is not really the president after all and being puppeteered by a military junta.
Generally I thought if a soldier a group of soldiers were disrespectful to the commander in chief like that they would be up for a court-martial.

What is the military coup actually happen and they're using Joe as a puppet to maintain order

Do marines salute to POTUS first or as a response to POTUS saluting to them? Need to find some Trump footage of getting on to the chopper or AF1.

Looks to me like the marines salute POTUS.

originally posted by: tallcool1
a reply to: panoz77

I was in the Army years ago, and I can confirm that saluting is initiated by whoever is junior in rank. For example - all enlisted personnel salute an officer and then the officer salutes back. Any junior officer salutes a senior officer and then the senior officer salutes back. The President, being the commander in chief, is saluted first by anyone in the military before he (or she) salutes back.

At least that was the tradition when I was in from December 1983 to December 1986.

There are circumstances during which a salute should not be given or is even forbidden. I found this article on it:
www.thebalancecareers.com...

Uniformed MIlitary Personnel

U.S. military personnel in uniform are required to salute when they encounter someone entitled by grade or rank to a salute, such as a superior officer. There are some exceptions: When in a moving vehicle it may be impractical to salute. However, if a gate guard at a base entrance or check point sees a senior officer in a vehicle, the guard will salute as the car passes through the gate. And when in a combat situation, a salute is forbidden, since it could signal to a watching enemy who the officers are. They are more likely to be considered valuable targets by the enemy.

The salute is considered a courteous exchange of greetings, with the junior military member always saluting first. When returning or rendering an individual salute, the head and eyes are turned toward the Colors or person saluted. When in ranks, the position of attention is maintained unless otherwise directed. All military personnel are required to salute the president, in his role as commander in chief. Also regardless of rank, any recipient of the Medal of Honor is granted a hand salute even from a more senior officer.

When Saluting Is Not Required

Salutes are not rendered indoors, except in cases of formal reporting. When in formation, members don't return a salute unless commanded to do so. The usual procedure calls for the person in charge of the formation to salute on its behalf. Even if the formation is marching holding weapons, there is a hand salute used by the leader of the formation typically with a sword or hand for the group.

If a senior officer approaches, while military personnel are gathered in a group (but not in formation), whoever notices the officer first calls the group to attention. Then, all members salute the officer, and remain at attention until they're given permission to stand at ease, or when the officer departs.

Based on my experience it seems like they should have saluted him, but I could be wrong. I'm sure the USMC has very specific rules about when to salute and when not to.

Reading through these other links seems to suggest that they should have saluted him.
www.thebalancecareers.com...
www.armystudyguide.com...
www.thebalancecareers.com...

a reply to: Guyfriday

PM 4 U.



Mayor is rushed out of City Hall in Washington state after protesters ripped down an American flag before storming the building during rally against clean-up of a homeless encampment

A Mayor was rushed out of a City Hall in Washington state after protesters ripped down an American flag before storming the building during a rally against plans to clean-up a homeless encampment.

Mayor Seth Fleetwood of Bellingham was escorted out of the building to safety Friday morning when a group of around 20 people entered the main lobby, according to KIRO7.

Bellingham Police arrived and asked the protesters to leave.

Bellingham Police Lt. Claudia Murphy told The Bellingham Herald the demonstrators left when they were told to, no one was injured and nothing was damaged inside the building.

Is the push for DC Statehood just a nice thing to do or perhaps it has an ulterior motive.

Get Ready For DC Statehood

“It is going to be reintroduced in the Senate in a couple of weeks, and we expect to have a favorable vote in the Senate as well, and then it goes to the president of the United States. We have made a big focus to President Biden to support D.C. statehood and make it part of his 100-day agenda.”

H R-1 For The People Act of 2021

Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood

US Constitution

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

Being aware that DC, London and Vatican City have much to point at indicating they are Deep State Cabal controlled sovereign entities, DC in particular is thought to be an entity called United States, Inc. Could the DC Statehood effort be an attempt to prevent NESARA which returns control to United States and the people.

NESARA/GESARA (The National / Global Economic Security & Reformation Act)

In 2001 after much negotiation the Supreme Court justices ordered the 107th Congress to pass resolutions approving' NESARA. This took place on September 9, 2001, eighteen months after NESARA became law. On September 10, 2001, George Bush Sr. moved into the White house to steer his son on how to block the announcement. The next day, on September 11, 2001, at 10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Alan Greenspan was scheduled to announce the new US Treasury Bank system, debt forgiveness for all U.S. citizens, and abolishment of the IRS as the first part of the public announcements of NESARA.
Just before the announcement at 9 am, Bush Sr. ordered the demolition of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers to stop the international banking computers on Floors 1and 2 in the North Tower from initiating the new U.S. Treasury Bank system. Explosives in the World Trade Center were planted by operatives and detonated remotely in Building 7, which was demolished later that day in order to cover-up their crime. Remote pilot technology was used in a flyover event to deliver a payload of explosives into the Pentagon at the exact location of the White Knights in their new Naval Command Center who were coordinating activities supporting NESARA's implementation nationwide. With the announcement of NESARA stopped dead in its tracks, George Bush Sr. decapitated any hopes of returning the government back to the people.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: texasgirl
a reply to: crankyoldman

I saw this earlier, Cranky, so I went back into the inauguration videos to the Arlington Cemetery one. There were 3 cannons there but only two were firing. And yes, they were 10 seconds apart.

I also don’t remember hearing a gun salute after Biden was sworn in.

Wow...

TG, these little things add up. If none of it matters then I, cranky, have been knighted by the Queen, please call me Sir. Matters not if I've met her or not or done the ritual, I say it is done. Each little piece of irregularity, no matter how small, shows us something.

I’m so glad for all the members in this thread. Instead of giving up we decided to shake it off and keep digging. Now look at all the little gems we’ve found.

This makes me very hopeful and excited!

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Saw it and replied

The issue with that event in Bellingham was the tid-bit at the end of your quote:

Bellingham Police Lt. Claudia Murphy told The Bellingham Herald the demonstrators left when they were told to, no one was injured and nothing was damaged inside the building.

So are we really to believe that this was about cleaning up homeless encampments, or is this more about attacking Socialist Alternatives little Troops. During the last election cycle the homeless was used to bring the votes in for both Biden and Inslee, I've posted oh so many posts about this, and had even talked at lengths with a friend of mine that works in local broadcasting. To consensus about it was that you can't talk about SA in public or lose your business license, and any connection that can be made about the Homeless and SA can lead to people getting hurt.

So this "attack" in Bellingham was more about cracking down on this group than it was about the homeless.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: TheBadCabbie

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: TheBadCabbie

originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: combatmaster

Nope, not at all, I prefer a no-government world... as my ancestors lived before colonialism

I thought it is interesting to note that this is actually a patch of common ground that probably most of us share. We mostly want less government in the world and in our day to day lives, if not quite so far in that direction as you yourself are. We mostly probably tend to align pretty closely on this particular viewpoint.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Justoneman

How did you feel about 12/21/12?

I have only had a can of Hopium the whole time. I wanted things corrected where liars get away with major ones to the public. You will notice I always said what I think things appear and how I hoped evil cabal members would get their come to Justice/Jesus moment. I want it done legally.

I am hoping the evil gets a short sheet real soon.

Yes, a moving date was bad news IMO but I am not in charge of any thing but my self. I can still hope and that is why I can wait. What is a few more weeks to decide that hope for that event needed to stop this evil, was missed. We have nothing to lose. I have done the best I can to share and maybe people heard it.

Hopium's the best, man! I'm getting a nice warm fuzzy just typing about it!

Seriously though, nothing wrong with hoping for a beneficial future outcome in world events, as long as you don't hang too many of your hopes on it. Movements happen in such ways, when people hoping for a positive change in the world become a part of that change that they want to see.

We are all a part of it and participating. Lack of participation is participation in the outcome. I believe educating your friends with sourced data is our best foot forward. Censorship of speech prevents the facts from coming forward. What should we do about that?

I hear you. Education and dissemination of the right information to the people seems like the way to go. It can hopefully inspire some of the kinds of changes we'd like to see in this country and the world. Censorship though...

I don't know the answer yet other than competing institutions that run the risk of being excluded from the market, but I think there is more than one way to skin a cat, so there is probably more than one way to reach the public and share information.

If the Dems and RINO's would protect the 1st we wouldn't be in this conundrum. The one where people who bring up the truth or any thing that doesn't pass the current PC fake checkers of facts criteria are canceled is bogus and so not going to work. We are not needing to find new ways of expression under the current 'tyranny' for lack of a better word. We are in need of enforcing our LEGAL and unalienable rights. Not of having some asshole break them over and over to shut us up.

Tar and feather time.

Well I agree about protecting the constitution and enforcing the rule of law. These are paramount. The rest of it though...

I agree that the reasoning for cancel culture is highly distasteful and should be resisted by anyone with enough brains to recognize its ugliness. If you're saying somebody ought to pass a law, well then I disagree with that. The right to choose who we will give our money and/or our time to is fundamental and should never be infringed.

I think we've got monopoly type situations that need to be addressed with some hard decisions that will probably not be very popular but are necessary to allow better access to the arena of mass media by a more diverse cast of journalists. Look at the stranglehold on broadcast, for instance. I think if we addressed this problem of monopoly, the rest might take care of itself.

As to the cancel culture, I'd like to see the ones calling for cancellations be cancelled. That's probably mostly what they deserve. I'm all for an ethical boycott, so boycotting those unethical SOB's sounds like a great idea to me! Really I've been voting with my dollars and my time for years now. We all should.

Probably just me, but I can't seem to get a live shot - old or new, of the WH.

Webam White House

Obviously trying to dig old night picks with new. Of course putting an old pic on a loop is the tired story trope in every movie so... there's that.

originally posted by: Parksy1981
This guy has a good thread on the happenings of Trump and the Plan.

Bob Forbes

Thankyou. Good one!

Nearly 1 year to the day...


@JoeBiden | @NBCNews

a reply to: TheBadCabbie

Fully understood and truly sorry to hear how things are. IWe - in a sense - are lucky enough to have several close relatives within the Medical party. Also understand the difficult measures ref; Full Medical advice plus treatment can be a problem your side of the pond. Have you, by chance, ever joined a Medical forum of Fellow sufferers ?? They do have Charity run folk who are well experienced and can often return either Better advice, or maybe more appropriate treatment. Also the wise way to find an affordable Medicine that may help. Therapy, correct dieting, plus a host of other lines do seem to help. Wife already has a curved spine that is - like your goodself - better felt by arrangement of soft items when bedtime crops up. Wish you all the VFery, Very Best for finding a seemingly way to avoid further aches & Pains. Just do your best please to take it easy and Wish you all the best for oncoming years.

A touch of humor for those with Twitter access...

twit

There are a lot of red flags upon digging into things like super soldiers/indigo/star children etc

A lot of dirty 🤡 hands involved.

A lot of occultism

A few mentions of using such people as antennas/channels/portals etc.

God can use these people too, of course- but personally -
As far as Q shaman goes -

I can’t trust it. Lol.


a reply to: MountainLaurel

a reply to: Vasa Croe

a reply to: SouthernGift

I share your position, but I always try to look at all angles to work out what is going on. The one thing that strikes me as odd is what is supressed. For example, both Trump and Qanon were the focus of suppression online. If Qanon is so clearly wrong, then why the extreme lengths to suppress it?

The video that MountainLaurel references (I posted in here) was suppressed by Youtube before it even hit 400 views (They'd want people to see it). If Jacob was a psy-op (counter operation) then wouldn't the point be to paint Qanon in a bad light? People really need to think about this. He might talk about some far out things in the video (but not really tbh), but generally he was positive.

So, either he is delusional, and YT stamped on him because they don't want Qanon painted in a positive light, or he is real, and they don't want the things he is saying being heard. I mean, you also have to question, that out of all the people who were noticed on the 6th, it was him. He was the one who stood at the top chair. What are the chances of that if he was just a random person?
EDIT:- To emphasise, I say "positive", because although he might be mad as a hatter (or shown to look like that) he wasn't violent, seems intelligent, chilled out etc.

There are a lot of mysteries around who is behind it all, and many wrote off Austin for various reasons. Usually because the Q that is in their head doesn't allow room for the kind of guy he seems to be.

And yet... we have this drop...

328
Dec 11, 2017 12:32:11 PM EST
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 4533cb No. 73461
:Owls:
Light will overcome d_a_rkness.
Light will expose darkne_s_s.
Light will _reveal_ darkness.
Light will defeat darkness.
Q

A S REVEAL.

How does anyone else interpret that? Then you have Jacob appearing with him. Supposedly Austin is in prison, and yet he can do call ins to a TV show?

It might be even more complicated than all this... Austin might be acting as a stooge, or a distraction as part of the operation. It is very hard to tell from the outside, like all of this. I reserve judgement. Warrior mentioned many moving parts. I believe him. When I look at Biden, I just think that if this isn't showing people, I don't know what is.

At this point, I am just waiting... trying to keep my vibration high in these days of darkness. I can't believe it is already the 25th of Jan! Anyway, I thought I'd share this video, as it's quite a nice description of keeping in a good state of mind. Weird thing though, the title mentions 4 days, and yet it doesn't appear anywhere in the actual video!

Shenanigans.



This is fascinating. One cannot grab the pics fast enough before the numbers change. But they never get better. I've seen, we've all seen, the manipulations in real time. Tech can give the event 1m likes without a problem. So WHY is the goog letting this happen? Or are they making it go this way?

Will the eneMedia turn on Joe?

a reply to: crankyoldman

I am honestly intrigued by the signature issues....those are really odd.

originally posted by: saladfingers123456
a reply to: SouthernGift

I share your position, but I always try to look at all angles to work out what is going on. The one thing that strikes me as odd is what is supressed. For example, both Trump and Qanon were the focus of suppression online. If Qanon is so clearly wrong, then why the extreme lengths to suppress it?

The video that MountainLaurel references (I posted in here) was suppressed by Youtube before it even hit 400 views. If Jacob was a psy-op (counter operation) then wouldn't the point be to paint Qanon in a bad light? People really need to think about this. He might talk about some far out things in the video (but not really tbh), but generally he was positive.

So, either he is delusional, and YT stamped on him because they don't want Qanon painted in a positive light, or he is real, and they don't want the things he is saying being heard. I mean, you also have to question, that out of all the people who were noticed on the 6th, it was him. He was the one who stood at the top chair. What are the chances of that if he was just a random person?

There are a lot of mysteries around who is behind it all, and many wrote off Austin for various reasons. Usually because the Q that is in their head doesn't allow room for the kind of guy he seems to be.

And yet... we have this drop...

328
Dec 11, 2017 12:32:11 PM EST
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 4533cb No. 73461
:Owls:
Light will overcome d_a_rkness.
Light will expose darkne_s_s.
Light will _reveal_ darkness.
Light will defeat darkness.
Q

A S REVEAL.

How does anyone else interpret that? Then you have Jacob appearing with him. Supposedly Austin is in prison, and yet he can do call ins to a TV show?

I've seen the suggestion that SA (mirror AS?) is Sheldon Adelson the Vegas tycoon. The suggestion was that he has been a White Hat in some way. He recently died.

"_" can be blanks or "leads to" or "connects" to something. Maybe Sheldon's death was a tip off? Dead 1-11-2020, 11122.

SA also Saudi Arabia, also South America, also South Africa. All or none, though Saudi drops are pretty clear at the outset and have proved pretty illuminating.

Sen. Rand Paul

I voted to certify the electors and seat the new President. It’s not about that anymore. They won’t even admit there is election fraud and want to pretend nothing happened.

He just admitted that he knowingly voted to certify and seat Biden when there was obvious election fraud. Why would he do that