Georgia Senate committee hearing

I got the video to play with better clarity, but still have some questions-

I’m assuming the ladies in yellow are feeding ballots into the machines? It’s still too far away/not clear enough that I can’t tell if they’re stacking them on another desk or putting them in a machine.

That should be easy enough to clear up with people who were in that room that know the locations of where the machines were. This could have been brought up in the hearing but I won’t be able to watch it for another 30 minutes.

If that’s indeed the case, they were feeding ballots into the machines in the time everyone was sent away, someone has to explain why that happened and they better have a damn good story or Rudy’s going to start looking credible.

As much fun as I’ve had laughing, at the end of the day, I want to know our elections are safe.

Georgia vote totals have been verified repeatedly by the Secretary of State.

The third recount results have been posted: Georgia SOS

The law has been followed meticulously.

It's so sad to see so many get their hopes up so many times (41 so far) only to be dashed again.

Over and over and over.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

You were asking for something that you knew didn't exist?

So, another disingenous, fallacious snipe from the sidelines for you?

Again with the strawman arguments. Quote where I have made claims about what is going to happen. I have stated, clearly and factually, that politcal drama in front of cameras isn't going to make any difference. I stand by that "prediction" because it's obvious.

I have stated the facts about what has happened. You have no counter to the fact that 41 cases out of 42 have shown that there is ZERO evidence for these ridiculous claims.

You know it; I know it.

Unless you can come up with something better, move on.

~yawn~

All I asked you to do is think harder.

Which you can't seem to.

And for the record, Trump has lost exactly 4 cases to date, which are being brought to higher courts.

Which is how it works.

All the rest you typed is the typical slop a beta male says when a woman is handing his ass to him on a public forum.

Which coming from you isn't even entertaining anymore.

I just expect it from you.

So carry on...

a reply to: Gryphon66
People like you are why I hate the left a lot more than I hate the right.

a reply to: Lumenari

You've admited you asked me to prove something you knew didn't exist.

Nothing in your post requires even normal levels of thought; you've proven yourself to be unreliable.

As I said, when you have something that is factual of note, let me know. Until then, taa taa.

originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: Gryphon66
People like you are why I hate the left a lot more than I hate the right.

Thanks for sharing.

Let me know if you come up with anything substantial on the topic, your likes and dislikes are irrelevant.

Let me know when you pull your head out of your ass. Your permission to post is not needed.

A detailed factual account of the status of the Trump, et. al. lawsuits: Financial Times

Notice, in all cases except one, the cases brought by Trump or Trump allies have been dissmissed or ruled against.

I'm not sure why so many lie when the truth is so easy to discover.

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at www.ft.com...
www.ft.com...

The outgoing president has claimed widespread fraud in the November 3 election but has provided no substantial evidence to back up his extraordinary claims of malfeasance.

Again and again, judges, including conservatives and Mr Trump’s own appointees, have rejected the president’s attempts to throw out millions of votes in order to cling to power. He has had just one win in a minor case concerning a small number of ballots.

originally posted by: Drucifer
I got the video to play with better clarity, but still have some questions-

I’m assuming the ladies in yellow are feeding ballots into the machines? It’s still too far away/not clear enough that I can’t tell if they’re stacking them on another desk or putting them in a machine.

That should be easy enough to clear up with people who were in that room that know the locations of where the machines were. This could have been brought up in the hearing but I won’t be able to watch it for another 30 minutes.

If that’s indeed the case, they were feeding ballots into the machines in the time everyone was sent away, someone has to explain why that happened and they better have a damn good story or Rudy’s going to start looking credible.

As much fun as I’ve had laughing, at the end of the day, I want to know our elections are safe.

LOL they aren't even supposed to be handling ballots once the observers leave period. Georgia law is very specific on this matter. Now I suppose they could have been running copies of their Christmas cards at 12:30 midnight on election day. The point is it needs to be investigated they need to be interviewed.

If it is found to be nothing fine, if it is legit they shouldn't have an issue with being talked too, they just got access to the tape last night.

originally posted by: TKDRL
Let me know when you pull your head out of your ass. Your permission to post is not needed.

Did I say you need my permission to post?

Nope. I told you to let me know if you manage to come up with a credible argument or verifiable facts.

I'm not interested in the feelz.

Have they verified the signatures yet ?

🤣🦑

🚨(be careful of people on temporary unsupervised release programs)🚨

a reply to: putnam6

One wonders why they held a press conference rather than filing the matter in court, no?

We'll see. Maybe THIS time it will be different.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Have they verified the signatures yet ?

🤣🦑

🚨(be careful of people on temporary unsupervised release programs)🚨

The signatures were verified at the outset of counting.

Before election officials counted absentee ballots in Georgia, they checked voter signatures to help make sure that ballots came from the voters who returned them.


That verification process reviewed signatures on absentee ballot envelopes when they were received at county election offices. Then ballots are separated from envelopes to protect the secret ballot, leaving no way to link voters to the candidates they chose. The right to cast a ballot in secret is guaranteed by the state Constitution.

AJC

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Georgia vote totals have been verified repeatedly by the Secretary of State.

The third recount results have been posted: Georgia SOS

The law has been followed meticulously.

It's so sad to see so many get their hopes up so many times (41 so far) only to be dashed again.

Over and over and over.

Approximately 10000 votes deference between Biden and Trump.

We’re these verifications recounts or audits?

Recounting bad ballots a hundred times will result in the same numbers.

It’s also important to understand what constitutes “voter fraud” and what constitutes “electoral fraud” when looking into this topic.

originally posted by: TKDRL
I am a lawyer, I just came along to say this is all a load of malarky and no proof at all. Now back to my favorite loch ness threads. Have fun guys.

Thanks for saving me the time, TKDRL! Appreciate it!

But really, the OP here is laughable. "The election was rigged 100%." Why? "[C]ounting the ballets !!"

Even if you are correct that ballots were counted after people were sent home, that is far from evidence of fraud or rigged election. I'm beginning to think that these posters don't need lessons on the law as much as they need elementary school vocabulary lessons. I mean the leaps in logic keep getting more and more ridiculous.

a reply to: NorthOfStuff

A count, an audit and a recount, technically speaking I believe.

The results have been constant.

Trump lost; Biden won.

a reply to: johnnylaw16

They don't like facts; they like feelz (as they say.)

The facts are blatantly clear.

If you have evidence you take it to court, not to a press conference.

Twitter is inadvertently confirming election fraud.

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Gryphon66
They've lost in court.

Over and over and over.

"Testifying" in front of these little legislative kangaroo courts will yield exactly the same effect: none.

Please link for me the SCOTUS findings on this matter then.

Oh wait.... it has to get there first?

Bush lost EVERY SINGLE COURT battle until Bush V Gore happened in the SCOTUS.

Here is where you try to tell me that Bush V Gore and Trump v Whomever is ENTIRELY different because... feelz?

Until SCOTUS takes some action, the lower court losses stand.

Well, I had to delete my post like 10 times, these trolls are getting to me. Gonna go take a break before I break the TC. Good luck guys