It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Georgia Senate committee hearing

page: 4
26
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:29 PM
link   
The way to find who is corrupt in the system, is to show them video like this and have them claim that everything looks normal.

mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: Drucifer
I would think that the security in a public building like that would have to be top notch and kosher for insurance purposes. I have been wrong before though lol


Yes one of the experts there mentioned these cameras were there for the arena and videos had been subpoenaed before for fights and insurance claims. Time and date stamp is on the actual videos being shown they have the whole day from start to finish.

who knows where this will lead to probably nothing but it interesting.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:33 PM
link   
They've lost in court.

Over and over and over.

"Testifying" in front of these little legislative kangaroo courts will yield exactly the same effect: none.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

The only standard of law is what they can post and get away with.

Another day, another fake claim by Trump supporters.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yeah just made up the security footage. I would laugh, but stolen elections are not that funny to me.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
They've lost in court.

Over and over and over.

"Testifying" in front of these little legislative kangaroo courts will yield exactly the same effect: none.


Please link for me the SCOTUS findings on this matter then.

Oh wait.... it has to get there first?

Bush lost EVERY SINGLE COURT battle until Bush V Gore happened in the SCOTUS.

Here is where you try to tell me that Bush V Gore and Trump v Whomever is ENTIRELY different because... feelz?



edit on 3-12-2020 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Everybody except the mainstream media is astounded by how much fraud these hearings are clearly displaying.

mobile.twitter.com...


You don't speak for everybody.

Legistlative hearings are nothing more than political theatre,

Trump et. al. have lost in court 1-41.

THAT is the fact.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Please link my claim that there has been a SCOTUS finding on anything.

Thanks. IF not (and it will be NOT) you're posting ridiculous and fallacious arguments again.

You think that the SC is going to hand the election to Trump???

Really???



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: nofear46

This reminds me of the Ruby hearings, the Kennedy hearings and the 911 hearings.
Full of evidence that gets falsely shot down.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yeah just made up the security footage. I would laugh, but stolen elections are not that funny to me.


"Security footage" eh?

I hope to see it in court soon. Because there's nothing that the Republicans in the General Assembly can do ...

Rudy and company know that. There's nothing here. 1-41.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Drucifer

Clearly stated in that video was “these tapes have been subpoenaed numerous times” for anything from fights, to accidents involving insurance claims as well as theft......

So if they can be used (and have been) in criminal and civil cases. I would say yes it’s pretty damning and clear to what is happening.

But again you would have to actively and attentively listen and comprehend what is being said, pretty much basic investigative stuff.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

President Trump was impeached by the US House simply for asking the president of Ukraine to help with the ongoing investigation into the Biden family corruption.

Virtually every bit of evidence we have seen in these election hearings rises above that nothing Burger phone call.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: Drucifer

Clearly stated in that video was “these tapes have been subpoenaed numerous times” for anything from fights, to accidents involving insurance claims as well as theft......

So if they can be used (and have been) in criminal and civil cases. I would say yes it’s pretty damning and clear to what is happening.

But again you would have to actively and attentively listen and comprehend what is being said, pretty much basic investigative stuff.


Why aren't they in court with them then? Instead of pandering in front of the cameras?

This is it! The evidence we've all been waiting for! I can't wait for another case to be thrown out.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Please link my claim that there has been a SCOTUS finding on anything.

Thanks. IF not (and it will be NOT) you're posting ridiculous and fallacious arguments again.

You think that the SC is going to hand the election to Trump???

Really???



I was asking for something that does not exist yet for you to back up your claim that you know something that hasn't happened yet.

Think harder.

As for the SCOTUS looking into this matter, actual lawyers say it is most likely to happen, so I don't consider that to be a ridiculous argument at all.

It isn't even an argument... it is an observation.

And do I think that the SCOTUS would rule in Trump's favor?

Absolutely.

But unlike you I am not certain what is going to happen, so I don't spend my whole day carpet-bombing threads with ridiculous and fallacious arguments.




posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:47 PM
link   
Even video footage is not proof to these people. It's not even worth arguing about anymore. They will never believe it no matter what proof is shown. Deny ignorance indeed.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

President Trump was impeached by the US House simply for asking the president of Ukraine to help with the ongoing investigation into the Biden family corruption.

Virtually every bit of evidence we have seen in these election hearings rises above that nothing Burger phone call.



In your opinion.

Forty one judges in forty one court cases disagree.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: interupt42

We don't know WHAT that activity that was going on was, we only have that woman's suppositions and accusations.

But Rudy Tooty, I like that one, but that's only my personal opinion and not one I believe could be proven in a court of law. Or has it.......?



Hey Terry, you must have some suspicions that something isn’t right.

This is your comment from your thread titled “Tulsi Gabbard on not indicting Trump”

From March 2019

“A side note, Gabbard, a member of the House of Representatives, is sponsoring a a bill that would do away with electronic ballots and establish a return to paper ballots to avoid electronic illegalities. This, I think, has been to long in the making and is a step in the right direction to securing the vote of each and every American.”

Did something change?



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: TKDRL
Even video footage is not proof to these people. It's not even worth arguing about anymore. They will never believe it no matter what proof is shown. Deny ignorance indeed.


Video footage can be entered in court.

Let's see it in court rather than another staged political stunt that carries zero weight.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: Drucifer

Clearly stated in that video was “these tapes have been subpoenaed numerous times” for anything from fights, to accidents involving insurance claims as well as theft......

So if they can be used (and have been) in criminal and civil cases. I would say yes it’s pretty damning and clear to what is happening.

But again you would have to actively and attentively listen and comprehend what is being said, pretty much basic investigative stuff.


I didn’t watch the video posted in this thread, it was on another forum and just had some woman talking over it, there was no lead-up to the footage. I’m not sure if it’s the same vid or not.

Regardless, that didn’t answer any of my questions.



posted on Dec, 3 2020 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

You were asking for something that you knew didn't exist?

So, another disingenous, fallacious snipe from the sidelines for you?

Again with the strawman arguments. Quote where I have made claims about what is going to happen. I have stated, clearly and factually, that politcal drama in front of cameras isn't going to make any difference. I stand by that "prediction" because it's obvious.

I have stated the facts about what has happened. You have no counter to the fact that 41 cases out of 42 have shown that there is ZERO evidence for these ridiculous claims.

You know it; I know it.

Unless you can come up with something better, move on.
edit on 3-12-2020 by Gryphon66 because: NOTED



new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join