It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: Drucifer
I would think that the security in a public building like that would have to be top notch and kosher for insurance purposes. I have been wrong before though lol
originally posted by: Gryphon66
They've lost in court.
Over and over and over.
"Testifying" in front of these little legislative kangaroo courts will yield exactly the same effect: none.
originally posted by: carewemust
Everybody except the mainstream media is astounded by how much fraud these hearings are clearly displaying.
mobile.twitter.com...
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yeah just made up the security footage. I would laugh, but stolen elections are not that funny to me.
originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: Drucifer
Clearly stated in that video was “these tapes have been subpoenaed numerous times” for anything from fights, to accidents involving insurance claims as well as theft......
So if they can be used (and have been) in criminal and civil cases. I would say yes it’s pretty damning and clear to what is happening.
But again you would have to actively and attentively listen and comprehend what is being said, pretty much basic investigative stuff.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari
Please link my claim that there has been a SCOTUS finding on anything.
Thanks. IF not (and it will be NOT) you're posting ridiculous and fallacious arguments again.
You think that the SC is going to hand the election to Trump???
Really???
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand
President Trump was impeached by the US House simply for asking the president of Ukraine to help with the ongoing investigation into the Biden family corruption.
Virtually every bit of evidence we have seen in these election hearings rises above that nothing Burger phone call.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: interupt42
We don't know WHAT that activity that was going on was, we only have that woman's suppositions and accusations.
But Rudy Tooty, I like that one, but that's only my personal opinion and not one I believe could be proven in a court of law. Or has it.......?
originally posted by: TKDRL
Even video footage is not proof to these people. It's not even worth arguing about anymore. They will never believe it no matter what proof is shown. Deny ignorance indeed.
originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: Drucifer
Clearly stated in that video was “these tapes have been subpoenaed numerous times” for anything from fights, to accidents involving insurance claims as well as theft......
So if they can be used (and have been) in criminal and civil cases. I would say yes it’s pretty damning and clear to what is happening.
But again you would have to actively and attentively listen and comprehend what is being said, pretty much basic investigative stuff.