Georgia Senate committee hearing

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

What proof did that video give? I saw none. What I heard was a woman pointing to activity that she said she did not understand because she keep asking who did what and where did things she only suspected were something come from. She did not offer any names of those people in the video and admitted that they only the night before began to watch those videos. No proof, just more Republicans with questions.

My question is just how stupid and anyone think those counters are? Stupid enough to commit fraudulent tabulation in front
of FOUR CAMERAS??? I saw no attempts to hid what they were doing, they just seemed to carry on with their work.

While most people left, we can assume that the blond woman was a supervisor. Do we know or does the woman presenting the videos know or even mention if there were different ''shifts'' working on this tabulation? Maybe those that remained were the swing shift or the night shift. There was no mention of any of those questions that I encountered in my viewing?

The cameras weren't there for the election the cameras were for security at the State Farm Arena the individuals might not even known cameras were present.

a reply to: Lumenari
Oh shucks. I would have gotten away with it too if not for those meddling Lumenarii

a reply to: nofear46

I've already been waiting and watching all the fallderall of the ''fraud committee'' for the last month and all I get from it's supporters is '' just wait, just wait''. Speculation and supposition and claim after claim after claim.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: nofear46

I've already been waiting and watching all the fallderall of the ''fraud committee'' for the last month and all I get from it's supporters is '' just wait, just wait''. Speculation and supposition and claim after claim after claim.

just wait then 😂

a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Are you #ing kidding me?

Proof that election laws were not followed and that a full audit is necessary to get to the bottom of what happened.

a reply to: putnam6

Sure, that may be. But are we to suppose that the supervisor and those above her were unaware of the cameras? Hell, I"m an old man who sits at home most of the time and I know that there are cameras EVERYWHERE. There are even cameras that can read the name on my mail box from outer space.

So here we are in what was this state of the video, Georgia? A swing state. And knowing that Trump was going to contest every single state with accusations of fraud, we are to suppose that these cheaters are so dumb as to not know that there would be cameras there? Highly unlikely huh?

a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Oh, so that's why no one ever commits crime anymore. I was wondering where all the criminals went. The cameras chased them all away.

a reply to: PurpleFox

Let's see what the courts say. Let's see what Trump's Department of Justice says. Oh wait, we have heard what they said. Courts are dropping allegations by the score and states have been certifying the states elections from A to Z. Barr said there was no proof of massive fraud. Trump's man from election security said it was secure, before Trump fired him.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: nofear46

I've already been waiting and watching all the fallderall of the ''fraud committee'' for the last month and all I get from it's supporters is '' just wait, just wait''. Speculation and supposition and claim after claim after claim.

Just watched by, Georgia law you can't count ballots without observers the camera videos show with time stamp after everybody was told to leave including press and observers. They continue to scan/count ballots for approximately 3 hours.

a reply to: nofear46
The Nevada court hearing later today will be BIG.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

The experts have spoken stop having hearings. Stop trying to gather evidence and testimony. The science is already settled guys!

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Actually he said it was the most secure of all time.
That should scare you no matter where you stand.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

You mean like protesters looting and burning on video? Or they are part of a political machine that controls the prosecutors and judges on what cases will be pursued and thrown out?

And I think the plan was to shame Trump into conceding.

Were procedures / chain of custody fallowed in the handling of the votes. Or were they broken.

originally posted by: nofear46

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: nofear46

I've already been waiting and watching all the fallderall of the ''fraud committee'' for the last month and all I get from it's supporters is '' just wait, just wait''. Speculation and supposition and claim after claim after claim.

just wait then 😂

Yeah Terry, just wait, another Nothingburger will be served shortly.

I don't know about you but I'm getting sick of the sight of these Nothingburgers.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire
You watched them break the law. You should be livid. Why are you not?

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: nofear46

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: nofear46

I've already been waiting and watching all the fallderall of the ''fraud committee'' for the last month and all I get from it's supporters is '' just wait, just wait''. Speculation and supposition and claim after claim after claim.

just wait then 😂

Yeah Terry, just wait, another Nothingburger will be served shortly.

I don't know about you but I'm getting sick of the sight of these Nothingburgers.

Like We all were with the Russia Hoax?

a reply to: putnam6

OK. But

Do we know that they were counting ballots? I certainly couldn't tell from watching the video, could you? Might it be that they were doing organizational work, something other than counting? Could that woman narrator know exactly what they were doing or was she just speculating as well

So yes, if there is a discrepancy to Georgia law then certainly, let's get to the bottom of it. Let's interview all those workers sworn in and testify. Let's hear from the blond woman who told everyone to go home, hell let's hear from those people too. Let's hear from the man who pulled the big boxes out from under that table. Let's hear it all in court. But let's not find proof from this video when there is no proof in the video.

a reply to: PurpleFox

Wrong. I watched them doing things. I have no ''proof'' that they were breaking the law, only that woman who was presenting the video's ''suggestion'' that they were breaking the law and that was based on her own questions on what was going on in that room.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Did you just say you watched the video? And didn’t; because if you did and see a “nothingburger”, you are being compliant with the criminally perpetrated breaking of our election laws.

So my question is this: did they break the law? And if not, how?

a reply to: djz3ro

Yeah, I admit to my biases. And one of my biases is to not jump to conclusions based on what other people tell me is going on in any specific video, a bias not shared it seems by many here.