It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: johnnylaw16
It is going to the SCOTUS . There it will be Determined if the Election Results were Genuine .
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
I been looking into our lawyer,and Im starting to think he is just Opposition. they dont really post in ANYTHING but the political threads dealing with election or similiar things. we should prolly just ignore them from now on.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
I been looking into our lawyer,and Im starting to think he is just Opposition. they dont really post in ANYTHING but the political threads dealing with election or similiar things. we should prolly just ignore them from now on.
originally posted by: waynos
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
I been looking into our lawyer,and Im starting to think he is just Opposition. they dont really post in ANYTHING but the political threads dealing with election or similiar things. we should prolly just ignore them from now on.
Can’t dismantle the argument so turn on the poster themselves. Classic sour grape behaviour, who knew 😅
originally posted by: waynos
a reply to: yuppa
No, you root out and demonstrate the flaws in the argument, or admit you can’t and may be wrong. Anything else is dishonest. It’s the message that matters, not the member. Calling ‘troll’ just because someone’s been shown to be wrong
Just devalues the whole debate.
originally posted by: HUSARIA
The problem is he hasn’t given a good argument. He just tells everyone he knows more about law than they do and claims to have experience in these types of cases.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: waynos
a reply to: yuppa
No, you root out and demonstrate the flaws in the argument, or admit you can’t and may be wrong. Anything else is dishonest. It’s the message that matters, not the member. Calling ‘troll’ just because someone’s been shown to be wrong
Just devalues the whole debate.
Ok look at That things posting history. Classic Oppo who will dissapear when Trump is either out or in for good.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: HUSARIA
The problem is he hasn’t given a good argument. He just tells everyone he knows more about law than they do and claims to have experience in these types of cases.
Is he incorrect? Has Trump filed a fraud suit and won that suit? Or had his attorneys present evidence of fraud in court? If so please link them.
originally posted by: HUSARIA
Nobody is right or wrong until the courts are through.
Everything isn’t black and white.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: waynos
a reply to: yuppa
No, you root out and demonstrate the flaws in the argument, or admit you can’t and may be wrong. Anything else is dishonest. It’s the message that matters, not the member. Calling ‘troll’ just because someone’s been shown to be wrong
Just devalues the whole debate.
Ok look at That things posting history. Classic Oppo who will dissapear when Trump is either out or in for good.
. Right, I’ll look again on Tuesday. Done this several times already after these promises but so far there’s been nothing there.
originally posted by: carewemust
Fraud evidence/proofs have been requested from a private group by the FBI. It will be delivered within 48 hours.
Source: electionwiz.com...