It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RsaWarhawk
can anyone help me figure out what answer we are expecting back from the defendants in the supreme court case? By that I mean a brief is meant to be filed by 3pm today so what exactly is it they are expected to say?
originally posted by: RsaWarhawk
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: RsaWarhawk
Lmao!! Yeah we’re obnoxious and we talk slow...but we’re really useful in a pinch.
Very helpful!
I just checked the case docket and my great state of Ohio has filed an amicus brief, thank god!! I just emailed our AG yesterday, and I got a bunch of my friends to send request today!! I feel I had a part in this
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
originally posted by: carewemust
Nancy Pelosi says Q-Anon is working with Kevin McCarthy, LOL.
twitter.com...
You lost me at “Nancy Pelosi says..”
She’s bat sheet crazy. Her green banana days are over too.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
originally posted by: carewemust
Nancy Pelosi says Q-Anon is working with Kevin McCarthy, LOL.
twitter.com...
You lost me at “Nancy Pelosi says..”
She’s bat sheet crazy. Her green banana days are over too.
I can't wait for this Revelation from Senator Grassley on the senate floor this morning to Branch out to Joe Biden..and then encompass swalwell, Pelosi, Schiff..the whole lot of them.
mobile.twitter.com...
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Well, as I predicted. The Federal Criminal investigation involves Hunter AND Jim Biden. How long until “the Big Guy” is ensnared. If not already.
originally posted by: bradychick
a reply to: Metalcrack
Ohio isn't supporting either side. I don't speak legalese so here is the document for any one who wants to look further
supremecourtdocket
originally posted by: bradychick
a reply to: Metalcrack
Ohio isn't supporting either side. I don't speak legalese so here is the document for any one who wants to look further
supremecourtdocket
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
Does anyone know where Lance is? I thought he'd be weighing in on these cases? I hope he's okay.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Wait, did Ohio side with the 4 corrupt states? lol
Ohio’s argument would negate the need for a SCOTUS at all, lol. Again 50 Divided States of America.
Their argument dies on the vine. SCOTUS just told NY they can’t restrict religious freedom.
SCOTUS won’t tell 4 states how they control their representative elections. They simply cannot change law in respect how the POTUS is selected.
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
I wasn't really sure who the Deep State is. This article explained it in part. The DS is comprised of unelected, high-level government officials who, unlike politicians, remain in place over long periods of time.
My understanding is that these people are the mid and senior leaders from the U.S. military, intelligence community, the State Department, Department of the Treasury, Department of Commerce, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the U.S. judicial systems.
And here we are.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Texas + 17 states going to SCOTUS over Election Hoax.
Over 1/3 of the states are telling SCOTUS the election was not conducted in accordance with states’ nor US Constitutions.
The remedies will be the key.
Q - “What do you want us to do about it?” - SCOTUS
A#1 - Instruct the State Legislatures in all 4 states to determine which electors to put forth.
A#2 - Instruct Congress to conduct a Contingent Election because without valid counts from those 4 states, neither candidate reached 270 electoral votes.
Thank-you! I've been looking all over for possible SCOTUS outcomes, and all I see are articles saying the Supreme Court will outright dismiss it. Even many conservative pundits (like Bill O'reilly) were telling Sean Hannity this today. They all say Texas has "No Standing".