It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - 32 -

page: 181
173
<< 178  179  180    182  183  184 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: RsaWarhawk
can anyone help me figure out what answer we are expecting back from the defendants in the supreme court case? By that I mean a brief is meant to be filed by 3pm today so what exactly is it they are expected to say?


Option 1. “So Noted”

Option 2. “I fight each fight like I feel.” - M.Spinks (6-27-88)

Option 3. “We can neither confirm nor deny.”

Option 4. “We didn’t do it. It was an accident.”

Option 5. “Exercise our rights under the 5th Amendment.”

Option 6. “We do not collectively recall.”

Option 7. “Trump did it.”

Option 8. “They killed Kenny! Those bastards!”

Option 9. “How many utes were there?”

Option 10. “YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!”



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: RsaWarhawk

originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: RsaWarhawk

Lmao!! Yeah we’re obnoxious and we talk slow...but we’re really useful in a pinch.


Very helpful!

I just checked the case docket and my great state of Ohio has filed an amicus brief, thank god!! I just emailed our AG yesterday, and I got a bunch of my friends to send request today!! I feel I had a part in this


I contacted DeWiner, AG, SoS, and my state Rep and Senator. Good job getting the word out!



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

All you guys are funny. I love ya'. 🤍



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: carewemust
Nancy Pelosi says Q-Anon is working with Kevin McCarthy, LOL.

twitter.com...



You lost me at “Nancy Pelosi says..”

She’s bat sheet crazy. Her green banana days are over too.


I can't wait for this Revelation from Senator Grassley on the senate floor this morning to Branch out to Joe Biden..and then encompass swalwell, Pelosi, Schiff..the whole lot of them.

mobile.twitter.com...




posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: carewemust
Nancy Pelosi says Q-Anon is working with Kevin McCarthy, LOL.

twitter.com...



You lost me at “Nancy Pelosi says..”

She’s bat sheet crazy. Her green banana days are over too.


I can't wait for this Revelation from Senator Grassley on the senate floor this morning to Branch out to Joe Biden..and then encompass swalwell, Pelosi, Schiff..the whole lot of them.

mobile.twitter.com...



I should know better but I’m wondering if Trump has had DOJ on HOLD....HOLD....HOLD.... GO!



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Metalcrack

Ohio isn't supporting either side. I don't speak legalese so here is the document for any one who wants to look further

supremecourtdocket




posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Well, as I predicted. The Federal Criminal investigation involves Hunter AND Jim Biden. How long until “the Big Guy” is ensnared. If not already.

He's already ensnared. They just aren't admitting it yet.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:21 PM
link   
Speaking of option 9...y’all know the blonde girl from dominion was acting like marissa tomei from my cousin vinnie, right?



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:23 PM
link   
Wait, did Ohio side with the 4 corrupt states? lol

Ohio’s argument would negate the need for a SCOTUS at all, lol. Again 50 Divided States of America.

Their argument dies on the vine. SCOTUS just told NY they can’t restrict religious freedom.

SCOTUS won’t tell 4 states how they control their representative elections. They simply cannot change law in respect how the POTUS is selected.


edit on 10-12-2020 by PilSungMtnMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: bradychick

a reply to: Metalcrack

Ohio isn't supporting either side. I don't speak legalese so here is the document for any one who wants to look further

supremecourtdocket




Well, AG Yost is getting voted out along with DeWiner

AG Yost's point seems to be the Judicial branch can't tell the legislature how to appoint electors, but Texas is seemingly just asking that the legislature can pick the electors how it sees fit, ignoring the election results as they are invalid.
edit on 10-12-2020 by Metalcrack because: (no reason given)

edit on Thu Dec 10 2020 by DontTreadOnMe because: ATTEMPT to fix quote tags




posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:32 PM
link   
MO/AK/LA/MS/SC/UT are attaching themselves like POTUS has to the Texas lawsuit.

www.supremecourt.gov... laint%20-%20Final%20With%20Tables.pdf



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: bradychick

a reply to: Metalcrack

Ohio isn't supporting either side. I don't speak legalese so here is the document for any one who wants to look further

supremecourtdocket




By my uneducated estimation it appears that they are offering support and interest in tjr outcome and willing to offer advice or opinion


legaldictionary.net...
Definition of Amicus Curiae
Pronounced

ah-mee-kuhs kyoo ree-ay

Noun

A brief filed with an appellate court by an individual or entity who is not a party to the litigation, but who has an interest in the court’s decision.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:35 PM
link   
Does anyone know where Lance is? I thought he'd be weighing in on these cases? I hope he's okay.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
Does anyone know where Lance is? I thought he'd be weighing in on these cases? I hope he's okay.


I miss Lance.

Remember that time we were at the Bellagio and Lance had too much tequila? Fun times.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Wait, did Ohio side with the 4 corrupt states? lol

Ohio’s argument would negate the need for a SCOTUS at all, lol. Again 50 Divided States of America.

Their argument dies on the vine. SCOTUS just told NY they can’t restrict religious freedom.

SCOTUS won’t tell 4 states how they control their representative elections. They simply cannot change law in respect how the POTUS is selected.


SCOTUS has already said that your civil rights don't disappear because there's a pandemic, pretty much in those exact words. It stands to reason then that Governors and beaurocrats cannot unilaterally change election laws days before an election because "pandemic." Laws need to be changed by the legislature, and this wasn't done.

Those states did not hold a legal presidential election, and that most certainly does hurt people outside their borders.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
I wasn't really sure who the Deep State is. This article explained it in part. The DS is comprised of unelected, high-level government officials who, unlike politicians, remain in place over long periods of time.


My understanding is that these people are the mid and senior leaders from the U.S. military, intelligence community, the State Department, Department of the Treasury, Department of Commerce, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the U.S. judicial systems.


And here we are.


^^^ That right there is the definition of the Swamp.

"We live under a Constitution that's living under something else: Continuity of Government!" -Professor Peter Dale Scott

UC Berkeley Professor and influential Political Research author Peter Dale Scott comes out of retirement to join Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt in an exclusive interview on the dangers of the Deep State and Continuity of Government (COG) unconstitutional emergency powers. He cautions the public that the 2020 election may become a battle for the future of humanity and freedom.

THE DEEP STATE
Scott coined the terms Deep State, Deep Politics, and Deep Events back in the late 60s to help describe a hidden governance structure that has been controlling public policy behind the scenes in American politics. He describes the Deep State as a “deep political system which habitually resorts to decision-making and enforcement procedures outside as well as inside those publicly sanctioned by law.”

COG DANGERS
Scott’s work on COG and the Deep State is the gold standard in independent research for understanding the problem of covert power. His books spanning five decades cover in depth deep events like the JFK Assassination, Watergate, Iran Contra, 9/11 and the seizure of emergency powers by dangerous elements in the national security state.

His COG work seems like a Time Capsule that has been vouchsafed for this special time in the middle of a perfect storm of civil war, political unrest, a potentially contested election and corporate media manipulation. Scott’s work is a flash of brilliance that occasionally lights up the battlefield with ordinances of profound insight to let the public know of the hidden hazard of unchecked, unrestrained power.

COG = suspension of Gov't which is focused on three items
1. Military like gov't
2. Suspension of the Constitution / Habeas Corpus
3. Control of Information...thou shall never speak of COG.

Peter Dale Scott: Deep State COG Doomsday Network Threat:
www.youtube.com...

The American Deep State: Wall Street, Big Oil, and the Attack on U.S. Democracy by Peter Dale Scott.

Articles by Peter Dale Scott: apjjf.org...

To All Readers: Help Force Congress To Observe the Law on National Emergencies!!!



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Yup. Alito has been telegraphing that fact for a few weeks.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Texas + 17 states going to SCOTUS over Election Hoax.

Over 1/3 of the states are telling SCOTUS the election was not conducted in accordance with states’ nor US Constitutions.

The remedies will be the key.

Q - “What do you want us to do about it?” - SCOTUS

A#1 - Instruct the State Legislatures in all 4 states to determine which electors to put forth.

A#2 - Instruct Congress to conduct a Contingent Election because without valid counts from those 4 states, neither candidate reached 270 electoral votes.

Thank-you! I've been looking all over for possible SCOTUS outcomes, and all I see are articles saying the Supreme Court will outright dismiss it. Even many conservative pundits (like Bill O'reilly) were telling Sean Hannity this today. They all say Texas has "No Standing".


I don’t really understand what their reasoning for that is... every state has a right to expect that other states are reasonably securing their national elections against fraud. Sure, there may not be any case law supporting their position (maybe there is something on a different topic?) but that’s the whole freaking purpose of the Supreme Court. If there was case law already interpreting the constitution as it applies here, we wouldn’t need the Supreme Court necessarily.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:43 PM
link   
a reply to: FinallyFree72

Yup. It matters not what everyone thinks.

It matters what SCOTUS thinks.

If they punt and let the states move forward with corrupted elections. We reap what we sow.



posted on Dec, 10 2020 @ 01:43 PM
link   
Getting very close to Show Time
Heavy MIL Equipment Spotted on WH Grounds
Spotted during Newsmax stand-up

twitter.com...







 
173
<< 178  179  180    182  183  184 >>

log in

join