It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
One last thing on the spelling from my own personal experience.
Spell(ing) is casting a spell. That's why it is called SPELLing. It isn't called wording, but spell-ing.
The english language itself is a joke, a mess of spell-ings that are not consistent. Home, Comb, roam etc. Garbage, in most languages you can spell any word after learning the alphabet and sounds but English = no. Spelling well is NOT, as in NOT, as in NOT a sign of intelligence.
I have found in my own life that folks have a thing about it, and not for the reasons they should. I once wrote a paper that was riddled with phonetic spelling well before spellcheck (I myself spell phonetically most of the time). The person it was directed at read it, said it wasn't good. I asked why. The answer was the spelling issues. I said, "well, that stupid, what about the content?" She paused, unsure. I said, "reread it now." She did. She said - "brilliant."
Why do I mention this? Well I observed that her rejection of the content was due to her version of her specialty being challenged though my paper - she had missed some obvious connections in her extensive work. She didn't want to see that, so she used "spelling" as justification for rejecting it.
Living the life of a deconstruction-ist is a wasted life. A pointless life. One can deconstruct for the dumbest of personal reasons leading to a distorted view of the world that, frankly, leaves it void of meaning. BTW, that was the entire purpose of the deconstructionist movement - render life meaningless by finding arbitrary reasons to find failure where there was none.
So back to Sidney, how do you cast a new spell? How do you undo and old spell? Through spell-ing.
In case my contention is lacking foundation within a Q thread
Sentence Formation Matters does not equal the King Queen American or any other formal English. Q is saying expand your thinking, symbols=words=usage that differs from the norm. Corny/Comey. The say things like "corney" so that YOU won't find it because YOU will reject spell-ing mistakes as wrong and will ignore them. Foolish.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: crankyoldman
That's unreal. They have slightly less than double our state's rolling average for 7 days, but they have way, way more people out there.
I feel like they're being handed a raw deal out of that.
originally posted by: Quadrivium
Just a reminder:
IC (intelligence community)=17 [agencies].
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: Aallanon
Just a thought,
We know the “want to play a game” line from the movie War Games right? Well it occurred to me that a much more relevant line from the movie is,
The only smart move is not to play.
I’m so f ing sick of not knowing what/who to believe.
Queesryche sums it up best “Who’d do you trust when everyone’s a crook?
Revolution calling!
The point at which a person realizes they cannot believe in others is meant to be the point at which they start believing in themselves = the goal.
originally posted by: onehuman
originally posted by: crankyoldman
One last thing on the spelling from my own personal experience.
Spell(ing) is casting a spell. That's why it is called SPELLing. It isn't called wording, but spell-ing.
The english language itself is a joke, a mess of spell-ings that are not consistent. Home, Comb, roam etc. Garbage, in most languages you can spell any word after learning the alphabet and sounds but English = no. Spelling well is NOT, as in NOT, as in NOT a sign of intelligence.
I have found in my own life that folks have a thing about it, and not for the reasons they should. I once wrote a paper that was riddled with phonetic spelling well before spellcheck (I myself spell phonetically most of the time). The person it was directed at read it, said it wasn't good. I asked why. The answer was the spelling issues. I said, "well, that stupid, what about the content?" She paused, unsure. I said, "reread it now." She did. She said - "brilliant."
Why do I mention this? Well I observed that her rejection of the content was due to her version of her specialty being challenged though my paper - she had missed some obvious connections in her extensive work. She didn't want to see that, so she used "spelling" as justification for rejecting it.
Living the life of a deconstruction-ist is a wasted life. A pointless life. One can deconstruct for the dumbest of personal reasons leading to a distorted view of the world that, frankly, leaves it void of meaning. BTW, that was the entire purpose of the deconstructionist movement - render life meaningless by finding arbitrary reasons to find failure where there was none.
So back to Sidney, how do you cast a new spell? How do you undo and old spell? Through spell-ing.
In case my contention is lacking foundation within a Q thread
Sentence Formation Matters does not equal the King Queen American or any other formal English. Q is saying expand your thinking, symbols=words=usage that differs from the norm. Corny/Comey. The say things like "corney" so that YOU won't find it because YOU will reject spell-ing mistakes as wrong and will ignore them. Foolish.
You can easily tell who doesnt "catch up" around here.
Back on page 7 I posted this below. I think it is pretty clear why Sidney meant to leave those misspellings on the documents and it checks off many of the points that Cranky has made. They matter, They mean something, they point to something. These were all early basics of Q that should be well learned by now.
This ss below has plenty of meat to it to be looked into and at least checked out IMHO of course.
The pic above is from a small 2 part rollout that has even more information that you may want to take a look at HERE
It is easy enough to read as there are only 2 parts to it and are basically graphics showing you what you need to know, or at least something to consider.
Im a typo Queen on Twitter all day long, but my followers get what Im trying to say and show them. They dont blow me off out of hand just because Im in fact to lazy to correct them. They recognize the "meat" of the matter I am presenting to them.
Also from all that if you take the time to check it out you will see that Dec 4th may actually be a big day.
originally posted by: carewemust
Is Lt. General McInerney active duty....someone who would know that Special Op forces raided a CIA facility in Germany to get the (Scytl?) servers, with possible U.S. forces casualties?
Source for my question: twitter.com...
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman
How is it that half an NFL team can test positive for COVID, yet then play a game 5 days later? Meanwhile, we plebs have to isolate for 14 days if we come in contact with a positive person.
Trust the science, right? That is, unless a win on Sunday is on the line. Then, by all means, get your positive ass out there and play!