It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: pexx421
It’s funny, but In all the pandemic style movies in the past, none of them predicted that the overwhelming response of the us would be denial.
Such a situation could only occur when people aren't really in fear for their life, and that could only occur when the symptoms pose very little threat to the majority of people. When a truly severe virus hits us no one will be denying it and we wont be arguing about whether it's less or more severe than a common cold.
The folks that she had escorted were tested and all were negative.
But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: one4all
No. I'm not going to wear a mask, suck in some of the sickness coming out of another mask and lingering in the air, and then let it circulate from my lungs to my mask to my lungs again. I'll continue wearing no mask and breathing free air that doesn't get humid and stuck inside a mask.
I get the thought process you're presenting, but your method only makes things worse and makes more people sick.
. If you had told me a year ago this is where the world would be now I'd never believe you in a million years
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: midnightstar
We've had a mask mandate where I am at since early this summer, and we still had a spike early this month ... enough that they've added extra measure within the last few days and a curfew.
Everywhere I go, I see ugly face diapers. No one is going without.
So why the spike?
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: ketsuko
And there are lots and lots of studies that show masks can prevent transmission. Seriously your efforts to link correlation to causation are erroneous and tiring. At least you wear your mask even though you don't believe in it.. As I've stated multiple times it is BS arguments like that that lead to a state like mine to completely disregard any recommendations.
originally posted by: game over man
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
Are you kidding me? Where were you decades ago telling every doctor, nurse, paramedic, painter, construction worker, carpenter, black smith, food worker, etc to not wear a mask? Huh?!!!! Where were you?? Since masks don't work? What are you going to do with all the mask wearing jobs?!
originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: midnightstar
Listen I can’t stand reading your comments. I had a better mastery of the English language when I was 6. Can you please just read along or find a new website . Getting informed by a 5 year old isn’t good for this website
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: SeaWorthy
I saw that... Man, I'm so sick of these motherlovers dictating every move we make while doing anything they want to do. I haven't seen it in my city yet, but I'm wondering just how long it'll be before people finally stand up.
1776
And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”
So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.
Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.
The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.
How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
Many of the new molecular tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called “home brews,” are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.