It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - 31 -

page: 357
165
<< 354  355  356    358  359  360 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
a reply to: FinallyFree72

Re: True & Fair Coverage

This stops mattering at SCOTUS. Normally stops at Circuit level.

SCOTUS stared into the eyes of a global pandemic that is hyper emotionalized by MSM and ruled on the side of religious freedom. Let that sink in.

Now, think how they will rule on Constitutionality of how these rogue states corrupted their own voting laws? That’s a parking ticket ruling compared to global pandemic/religious freedoms ruling.



I 100% agree with you - SCOTUS doesn’t care about the media or looking bad or public opinion or any of that nonsense. Their only concern is enforcing the constitution no matter how wildly unpopular that is. Or at least that’s how a properly functioning SCOTUS operates. I was more or less addressing the question about when msm will start covering it. I think anything short of when it reaches SCOTUS will get zero coverage.



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 08:51 AM
link   
a reply to: FinallyFree72

My $ is that it won’t matter. MSM (including Faux) have cratered viewership. Just like when their followers bailed after Mueller when they were promised Trump was a Russian agent. Then more left when the Impeachment was a nothingburger. Now a corrupt election?

I’m running with these two;

pandemic.warroom.org...

www.oann.com...



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:01 AM
link   
a reply to: FinallyFree72

You’re right - the institution of the SCOTUS is not supposed to care about, nor be beholden to these things, but the individual Justices are human, with human problems and human defects. They are able to be compromised and blackmailed. Just ask Chief Justice Roberts. He is the real wild card here, and I DO NOT trust him to be impartial and to rule with the Conservative majority.

Case in point - just look at how Roberts just sided with the Liberal dissenters on the decision regarding Catholics and Jews in NYC just yesterday. Roberts is a SNAKE in judges robes.
edit on 26-11-2020 by PokeyJoe because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:02 AM
link   
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

I can only turn on Fox every now and again to see if they’re even reporting it. They’re not.

They are doing a disservice to all citizens by not letting them know what’s coming.



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:07 AM
link   
Harmeet Dillon seems to have had a change of perspective,


Harmeet K. Dhillon @pnjaban · 8h 4/ These are serious allegations, and maybe the evidence (some of it filed and some of it under seal provisionally) will persuade. Either of these big themes would be enough to change the election results given the narrow margin for Biden. To me, the easiest way to reach that...


mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:07 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

PJ - that religious freedom > Death Plague ruling by Alito/Thomas & Trump Trio paved the way. If they were going to cave it would have been easy to on them side of “health scare”. They didn’t. Alito is a bad ass. Thomas too. AWESOME role models for the three rookies.



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:11 AM
link   
Good morning and happy Thanksgiving to those who celebrate =)

This looks to be the angle of attack to hide Sidney's work

link



and this:
link


eta and save space
link

edit on 26-11-2020 by bradychick because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-11-2020 by bradychick because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:11 AM
link   
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Yes. Luckily it’s currently 6-3 so even if Roberts joins his Liberal friends, if everyone else rules according to party it shouldn’t matter.



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:20 AM
link   
a reply to: bradychick

Over target.

🎯



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:22 AM
link   
They all should rule based on the constitution, parties are what got us into this mess in the first place.
Eta either way T wins but optically the best way to be united is if it's unanimous.
a reply to: PokeyJoe


edit on 26-11-2020 by CrazyFox because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-11-2020 by CrazyFox because: Eta



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:23 AM
link   
Alternate link for Sidney Powell filing

www.documentcloud.org...



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: CrazyFox
They all should rule based on the constitution, parties are what got us into this mess in the first place. a reply to: PokeyJoe



Yup. I would love one time for a liberal judge to rule in favor of Constitution but Roberts still oppose, lol.



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: CrazyFox

Yeah that sounds great and all, but the Conservatives currently hold a large majority and they’re going to have to stick together if they have any hope of keeping the Presidency. I’d love for everyone to come together as one, but that’s not our reality. The Dems made this bed, now they get to lie in it. Anyways, the Constitution is on the side of the Conservatives this time around, so hopefully partisan politics and the Constitution can be on the same page for once.

Not exactly holding my breath on this one though...
edit on 26-11-2020 by PokeyJoe because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: CrazyFox

Yeah that sounds great and all, but the Conservatives currently hold a large majority and they’re going to have to stick together if they have any hope of keeping the Presidency. I’d love for everyone to come together as one, but that’s not our reality. The Dems made this bed, now they get to lie in it. Anyways, the Constitution is on the side of the Conservatives this time around, so hopefully partisan politics and the Constitution can be on the same page for once.

Not exactly holding my breath on this one though...


I wonder how many of the Supremes are looking forward to having their power diminished by having a Biden/Harris administration adding a bunch more SC Justices.



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:49 AM
link   
So did anybody else see how Sidney Powell made all sorts of spelling errors in her “Kraken” GA lawsuit? The word “District” is grossly misspelled in the first 2 lines of the document. What’s up with that? More intentional spelling errors to get the media to report on something they otherwise would have ignored? We’ve seen this happening a lot lately, and normally you would think they’d go thru these things with a fine toothed comb to insure there are no glaring, elementary errors like were now seeing.

Very curious....



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Yep, I reckon so. They know there are tonnes of lefties out there who just can't wait to post a link to show Trump's "stupid" lawyer and share it with all their friends.

Maybe some of them will take a gander...



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 10:06 AM
link   
For once I actually like this guy today. This is a pretty big chess move. Almost feels like something the Master would do or put into motion. Maybe even a bit of a BOOM!

A Snippet:

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is moving $455 billion in unspent stimulus money into a fund that the incoming Biden administration cannot deploy without Congress, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.
It will leave Mnuchin's likely successor, Janet Yellen, with only $80 billion in relief funds at her discretion.
Experts say Mnuchin's move greatly limits the tools available to the Biden administration to manage the economic fallout of the pandemic.


Another Snippet:

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is moving $455 billion in unspent stimulus money into a fund that the incoming Biden administration cannot deploy without Congress, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.


FULL ARTICLE



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: onehuman

Ha. What will the president in waiting do? nothing!



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 10:08 AM
link   
Whatever Vincent Fuska is, he seems to be everywhere, and he sometimes makes interesting observations re:Q.
His comment regarding the Districct Distrcoict is that spelling mistake matter.

C C O

Corporate Criminal Offence - CCO

Corporate Criminal Offence (UK) Q & A


This week, HMRC shared research carried out on over 1000 businesses during late 2018. The questions were all focused on their awareness of the Corporate Criminal Offences (CCO) that were part of the Criminal Finances Act 2017.

CCO was introduced 18 months ago and designed to drive a “behavioural shift among companies and partnerships to take an active and increased responsibility for preventing the facilitation of tax evasion”. The objective of this research was to examine the extent to which this has been successful.


Link to below source

Luxfer and its subsidiary companies have a zero-tolerance approach to tax evasion and the facilitation of tax evasion, whether under UK law or under the law of any foreign country.

The Criminal Finances Act came into effect in the UK in 2017 and facilitated the reinforcement of policies against the act of or facilitation of tax evasion. Luxfer has an expectation of compliance with all laws relevant to countering tax evasion, including the Criminal Finances Act 2017.

All Luxfer personnel are responsible for the success of this policy and should ensure they use it to disclose any suspected danger or wrongdoing.


Makes me wonder if it might be a clue to future direction? I think about Amazon and Google etc, who basically pay zero tax despite all of their earnings.

This is one potential CCO... Just thoughts.



posted on Nov, 26 2020 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
So did anybody else see how Sidney Powell made all sorts of spelling errors in her “Kraken” GA lawsuit? The word “District” is grossly misspelled in the first 2 lines of the document. What’s up with that? More intentional spelling errors to get the media to report on something they otherwise would have ignored? We’ve seen this happening a lot lately, and normally you would think they’d go thru these things with a fine toothed comb to insure there are no glaring, elementary errors like were now seeing.

Very curious....


Dominion probably wrote the spell-check code.



new topics

top topics



 
165
<< 354  355  356    358  359  360 >>

log in

join