It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Frodolives
originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: Frodolives
So if nothing happens and Q turns out to be a joke, then youll still follow it because you need a LARPer to reveal corruption?
I get that it has created a community of truth seekers. But it's going to look awefully silly if Q continues without much happening and a group of truth seekers is brought together by a LARP.
Well see..
Only you believe I am following a LARPer.
I am only researching corruption on a massive scale.
Is that now considered LARPing?
The articles above are from a year ago. I find this very intriguing given the great conjunction of Saturn/Jupiter on winter solstice this December.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: Vasa Croe
That’s absolutely absurd. WTF are they doing with all that TP? I have 2 young children, my wife and myself and we use MAYBE 5 rolls a month.
originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: brewtiger
Q has been promising arrests and big reveals for four years. Clock is ticking and soon Q will be proved right or be shown to be a big joke.
Ill be suprised if anyone listens to Q again if nothing happens and Biden wins. Or are people so invested tgat they'll believe no matter what?
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: CrazyFox
If you read the transcripts from some of the court cases the trump lawyers are not claiming fraud.
Not when asked by a judge that is.
Anyone that hasn't read the court transcripts should.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: CrazyFox
If you read the transcripts from some of the court cases the trump lawyers are not claiming fraud.
Not when asked by a judge that is.
Anyone that hasn't read the court transcripts should.
Trump doesn’t have to prove “fraud”. That would require “intent”. Trump just had to show that the computers were changing/flipping votes. Show states violated their own election laws. Show failure to maintain a chain of custody in ballots. All of the “fraud” is a DOJ matter.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: IAMTAT
I like how General Flynn has become more vocal, post-election. The photo of him meeting with Trump legal team leaders, indicates he may be showing them "where the bodies are buried".
originally posted by: PurpleFox
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: CrazyFox
If you read the transcripts from some of the court cases the trump lawyers are not claiming fraud.
Not when asked by a judge that is.
Anyone that hasn't read the court transcripts should.
Trump doesn’t have to prove “fraud”. That would require “intent”. Trump just had to show that the computers were changing/flipping votes. Show states violated their own election laws. Show failure to maintain a chain of custody in ballots. All of the “fraud” is a DOJ matter.
So many mouth breathing troglodytes dont seem to understand this. All that has to be proven is that there was a concerted effort to effect the outcome of the 2020 election. That's it.