Another Video Exposing the True Nature of Joe Biden

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

That's how desperate asylum seekers are to get their families to safety. It's a tragedy that a trek across a desert is safer than staying home.

There is no excuse for the United States Government not to reunite these families for deportations together, unless they thought it wasn't ethical to send children back to unsafe countries.

There is no excuse for automatically separating families that arrive on US soil seeking asylum as a punishment and then deporting the parents but keeping the children.

It's no different than the Child care system in the United States of America Sookie .

What does the Government do to Parents who are irresponsible and neglect there children ?

They take there kids sookie , but the truth is the only real reason these people are dragging there kids to the border short of selling them into sexual enslavement, they are using there own children as leverage they know if they have a child the Border patrol is less likely to turn them away .

And Sookie don't give me some sob story about how bad it is in south America that is a load of BS , I have traveled to South America I have friends in South America it's not some hell on earth it's just other countries with plenty of opportunities .

There may have been a time when people came to America from Mexico looking for a " Better life " but now it's just a generic journey to America where they end up living off the Government.

wake up sookie.

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

That's how desperate asylum seekers are to get their families to safety. It's a tragedy that a trek across a desert is safer than staying home.

There is no excuse for the United States Government not to reunite these families for deportations together, unless they thought it wasn't ethical to send children back to unsafe countries.

There is no excuse for automatically separating families that arrive on US soil seeking asylum as a punishment and then deporting the parents but keeping the children.

It's no different than the Child care system in the United States of America Sookie .

What does the Government do to Parents who are irresponsible and neglect there children ?

They take there kids sookie , but the truth is the only real reason these people are dragging there kids to the border short of selling them into sexual enslavement, they are using there own children as leverage they know if they have a child the Border patrol is less likely to turn them away .

And Sookie don't give me some sob story about how bad it is in south America that is a load of BS , I have traveled to South America I have friends in South America it's not some hell on earth it's just other countries with plenty of opportunities .

There may have been a time when people came to America from Mexico looking for a " Better life " but now it's just a generic journey to America where they end up living off the Government.

wake up sookie.

I do think part of the major issue is that many that believe these lies have never been where they claim is all death and destruction.....they just believe what they read. Sure, there are bad areas in every country.....just look at Chicago.

I have traveled fairly extensively, stayed in hostels, etc....and the description these folks seem to want to use does not fit the actual circumstances.

Hell, Cuba was supposed to be a horrible place, blah blah blah. People vacation there now. Sure there are oppressive countries worldwide, but anyone saying Mexico is one is crazy. Even if these folks are coming from farther south, Mexico would be the very first place I would want to stay.....they speak a similar language and making a life would be much easier.

I mean when Mexico gets so bad that they close the border for US citizens wanting to vacation there I may have a concern......but alas.....that will never happen because it isnt bad at all.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Annee

Excuse me for being Pro LIVING Children.

I guess the big question is when you you label it a living child?

Viable outside the womb.

Back to Personal Liberty to Choose (mask or not).

Don’t pull that if you’re going to be selective.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Annee

Excuse me for being Pro LIVING Children.

I guess the big question is when you you label it a living child?

Viable outside the womb.

Back to Personal Liberty to Choose (mask or not).

Don’t pull that if you’re going to be selective.

So children with Downs should be put down? Or what about adults that develop MS or a terminal disease? Why can't we put them down too? Just a burden on our Healthcare system right? What about those that just have constant medical issues and offer no societal assistance other than a job for those that have to take care of them?

Why not put them all down. Is it because of feelings?

originally posted by: Annee

Viable outside the womb.

Head 1/2 way out? Cord is finally cut? What is Viable...Can we agree that at 6.5 months the fetus is considered viable outside the womb.

Back to Personal Liberty to Choose (mask or not).

Don’t pull that if you’re going to be selective.

I didn't, so not sure what you are talking about?

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
By the way...Tampax now says it isnt just women that have periods, so pretty soon I can get my reproductive rights in the news too!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

That's how desperate asylum seekers are to get their families to safety. It's a tragedy that a trek across a desert is safer than staying home.

Your assumption is they are coming here for safety, risk of life and not for just economic reasons. Also living in a crappy country is not reason for asylum. That is reserved for persecutions by their Goverment, and not just crime in general. We can also add that around a crappy country like Venezuela with a high crime rate there are 18 other countries easier or closer to get to than America...lol You are suppose to seek asylum in the nearest country you can...not walk across 10 to get to America.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Annee

Viable outside the womb.

Head 1/2 way out? Cord is finally cut? What is Viable...Can we agree that at 6.5 months the fetus is considered viable outside the womb.

Back to Personal Liberty to Choose (mask or not).

Don’t pull that if you’re going to be selective.

I didn't not sure what you are talking about?

I would love to know the stance on putting folks on life support from the pro choice crowd based on this viability argument.

It would be hypocritical to say yes to any form of life support for them as the person receiving it would not be viable without it.

47 year politician should know how to appear like a human...

Or his disctricts voters are some of the dumbest on the planet.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

I would love to know the stance on putting folks on life support from the pro choice crowd based on this viability argument.

It would be hypocritical to say yes to any form of life support for them as the person receiving it would not be viable without it.

I can agree with your point...

I'm actually not religious and so I don't appose all abortions. I feel there is a time period that they should be allowed, but the slope gets really slippery as to the value of life in general when you push abortions to late term, while having incentives to do so for the body parts, chemicals, hormones, blood a new born has...

a reply to: Xtrozero

Your assumption is they are coming here for safety, risk of life and not for just economic reasons.

That's not for me to decide. There is no excuse for separating families, then deporting the parents, because they don't meet asylum qualifications, and keeping their children.

People here are so concerned about Joe Biden hugging children and kissing their heads and smelling their hair, but they're just fine with Donald Trump taking asylum seeker's children and deporting their parents.

They turn a blind eye to the children being sexually assaulted and emotional abused while in US detention facilities...

...but Joe Biden!

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

That's how desperate asylum seekers are to get their families to safety. It's a tragedy that a trek across a desert is safer than staying home.

Your assumption is they are coming here for safety, risk of life and not for just economic reasons. Also living in a crappy country is not reason for asylum. That is reserved for persecutions by their Goverment, and not just crime in general. We can also add that around a crappy country like Venezuela with a high crime rate there are 18 other countries easier or closer to get to than America...lol You are suppose to seek asylum in the nearest country you can...not walk across 10 to get to America.

It is hilarious to me that every country they have to go through to get to the US is where almost every expat or vacationer from the US goes to vacation or live.

Hell....let me know when a family from Belize needs to come in and I'll trade with them.

I truly do think folks have no idea about anything other than what they get from their social media echo chamber.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Annee

Excuse me for being Pro LIVING Children.

I guess the big question is when you you label it a living child?

Viable outside the womb.

Back to Personal Liberty to Choose (mask or not).

Don’t pull that if you’re going to be selective.

Newsweek

The study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine on Thursday, looked at nearly 5,000 babies born before 27 weeks of gestation. It found that a significant number of babies who were born at 22 weeks, just over five months of gestation, survived after being medically treated in a hospital. Previously, 22 weeks was considered too early to resuscitate a baby because survival rates were so low.

That was in 2014, good chance we can save children at an even earlier age with 6 more years of medical advancements.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

It is hilarious to me that every country they have to go through to get to the US is where almost every expat or vacationer from the US goes to vacation or live.

What does that have to do with the US policy of taking asylum seekers children while deporting their parents?

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

I would love to know the stance on putting folks on life support from the pro choice crowd based on this viability argument.

It would be hypocritical to say yes to any form of life support for them as the person receiving it would not be viable without it.

I can agree with your point...

I'm actually not religious and so I don't appose all abortions. I feel there is a time period that they should be allowed, but the slope gets really slippery as to the value of life in general when you push abortions to late term, while having incentives to do so for the body parts, chemicals, hormones, blood a new born has...

I am not religious either and also do not oppose all abortions. If there is a real reason other than "oops I did it again" then ok, but to blanket statement that women should be able to, have taxpayers pay for it and have no consequence is ridiculous.

I mean I could say the same for any crime really.....it is a case by case basis, not a blanket statement for all. The only reason for the pro choice push is so the woman won't feel guilty about murdering a child. It is a extreme measure pushed by the left for a very small fraction of those that actually SHOULD or NEED to have an abortion.

It is similar to every single progressive movement ever. No plastic straws because a video of one turtle having a straw in its nose, a tiny fraction of police involved shootings of blacks, a tiny fraction of folks who believe there are more than 2 genders, etc.....

Yet these same folks want to say they believe in science. It is like Bizarro world.

Science says life begins at conception. There are protected turtle breeding grounds of eggs because of the same people. So, if I go stomp on a protected turtle breeding ground, can I claim they aren't viable?

It is complete insanity.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vasa Croe

It is hilarious to me that every country they have to go through to get to the US is where almost every expat or vacationer from the US goes to vacation or live.

What does that have to do with the US policy of taking asylum seekers children while deporting their parents?

Please cite this policy and make sure to point out where it says we keep their children and deport their parents. Also please let me know when this policy went into place and who passed it.

Thanks!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vasa Croe

It is hilarious to me that every country they have to go through to get to the US is where almost every expat or vacationer from the US goes to vacation or live.

What does that have to do with the US policy of taking asylum seekers children while deporting their parents?

Whaaaaat?? What do we do to them? Sacrifice them to Moloch?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Annee

Excuse me for being Pro LIVING Children.

I guess the big question is when you you label it a living child?

Viable outside the womb.

Back to Personal Liberty to Choose (mask or not).

Don’t pull that if you’re going to be selective.

Honestly, outside of incest, rape and possible complications that result in the mother's death, is there any reason to have an abortion?

I was adopted at birth in 1977....my mom was young and it was a accidental pregnancy. I am proud of her for understanding life is life and a accident doesn't mean a death sentence.

There is a reason that a man and a woman have the anatomy they have. It is solely to reproduce. Every animal on earth has the ability. I have yet to see any other that aborts in utero....

Sure, some will kill and eat the weakest link after born, but I do think that would be kinda frowned upon with humans.

So.....science.....does it include other species, or just what humans deem science based on thoughts and feelings?

I can't recall the last time I got onto my dog for raping another dog, my chickens for laying non-viable but edible eggs/babies, nor wondering why there are so many deer in my suburb of Atlanta.....

I need to start a pet company where I train all pets to kindly ask before humping a leg or another dog.

Damnit.....now I have to be concerned for the reason why males in every species are more dominant! Humans must have infiltrated the sexuality of all species on earth!

Yet another reason to eliminate every new human.....take note lefties.....use this to your advantage.....even nature is misogynistic in every way.

/sarc

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
That's not for me to decide. There is no excuse for separating families, then deporting the parents, because they don't meet asylum qualifications, and keeping their children.

Talk to the 9th court under Obama, not me...You said asylum which has very key points you must meet to seek it as I said in my post.

Donald Trump taking asylum seeker's children and deporting their parents.

Well its not Trump its the laws set by a liberal court... Seems under Obama they thought differently.

They turn a blind eye to the children being sexually assaulted and emotional abused while in US detention facilities...

...but Joe Biden!

Really? OK....

You are sounding like Joe every day... What did Joe/Obama do for 8 years? Where was your outcry over them? Do you really think they are experiencing emotional abuse anywhere near what they got traveling across many countries? They finally feel safe for once...

a reply to: Xtrozero

Hell...Im still waiting for the citation of US policy on this and when it occurred and who put it in place.....