It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: neutronflux
You referring to items like this?
No, I'm not.
The first three were not proactive or preemptive, filing a statement of interest is not the same as challenging it yourself and the last had nothing to do with the Department of Justice.
The other four posts I'm not addressing, learn to put everything in one coherent reply, I'm not into your pathological multi-posting stream of consciousness replies.
Five replies for one post, SMFH.
And if they are un-Constitutional they should be challenged.
The fact that you are defending lockdowns and support government overreach says more about you than it does about me. Keep licking that b
originally posted by: 0bserver1
That's all they want to get all the franchises and freelancers off the market, so that the IRS and other of the world government taxes take back control over the money that they otherwise lose control over.
originally posted by: neutronflux
Not pro active? Law suits initiated on state matters at the state level backed by the DOJ.
You wanted lawsuits, and law suits were pursued. Lawsuits backed by the executive ran DOJ and the president’s party. That’s what you wanted right.
originally posted by: neutronflux
Ok. If he DOJ filled their own lawsuits in addition to the lawsuits already filled state by state backed by the DOJ how would that sped up the results or changed outcomes.
Still not seeing how Trump “crushed” the middle class over state governors’ lockdowns which the executive branch has little control over.
And the Trump administration back lawsuits opposing the lockdowns.
The rich are stealing money from the lower classes and there are so many people from those classes that defend them.
How? Seriously? They may have been found un-Constitutional from the outset. That's like asking, 'How could dieting this week instead of next week benefit me?'.
Of course you don't, he's your boy and your boy can do no wrong.
How? Seriously? They may have been found un-Constitutional from the outset
originally posted by: neutronflux
Ok. If he DOJ filled their own lawsuits in addition to the lawsuits already filled state by state backed by the DOJ how would that sped up the results or changed outcomes.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: neutronflux
Ok. If he DOJ filled their own lawsuits in addition to the lawsuits already filled state by state backed by the DOJ how would that sped up the results or changed outcomes.
Are you asking me the difference between filing it on day 1 or waiting for a month or longer for the state to do it? Oh, I don't know, maybe time?
FFS.
Now go make ten replies to this one and tell me who's deranged.
originally posted by: neutronflux
Trump is “crushing” the middle class because the DOJ backed lawsuits against the lockdowns that went beyond the 28 day constitutional emergency period without being voted on by state legislators didn’t move through the court systems fast enough for you?
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You
The trillions in bailouts and no national direction on shutdowns. You don't need 'laws' to do this.
Exactly how did the bailouts take anything from the middle class?
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You really have a bad case of Trump derangement syndrome if you think Trump has control of states that grant emergency powers to their governors.
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You really have a bad case of Trump derangement syndrome if you think Trump has control of states that grant emergency powers to their governors.
And you have a really bad case of Trump-induced blindness if you think that's a significant factor in the draining up of even more money. This is national, international and transnational money, not the chicken factory on the edge of town.
originally posted by: Whodathunkdatcheese
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You really have a bad case of Trump derangement syndrome if you think Trump has control of states that grant emergency powers to their governors.
And you have a really bad case of Trump-induced blindness if you think that's a significant factor in the draining up of even more money. This is national, international and transnational money, not the chicken factory on the edge of town.