It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Covington and Burling (Flynn's old lawyers) have signed on to the case
originally posted by: FlyingFox
Wait, judge Contraras was Flynn's judge in the criminal case and he signed the FISA warrant to wiretap him?
More: www.reuters.com...
According to a court filing, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, who presided over a Dec. 1 hearing where Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his contacts with Russia, will no longer handle the case.
Court spokeswoman Lisa Klem did not say why Contreras was recused, and added that the case was randomly reassigned.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: CanadianMason
Do you guys recall the Project Stargate remote viewing docs the CIA dropped a while back? One of the remote viewers visited what was thought to be Mars, and something there showed them an image of a great cataclysmic event caused by a planet going through the tail of a comet.
originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: samuelsson
What has happened to you, America?
originally posted by: crankyoldman
a reply to: liveandlearn
Covington and Burling (Flynn's old lawyers) have signed on to the case
Where did you see this? In what capacity?
In another strange turn of events, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has invited Michael Flynn’s former defense counsel to appear as interested parties in their former clients ongoing case. Sullivan, who did not agree to drop the charges against Flynn as requested by the Department of Justice, did not specify the purpose for inviting the former lawyers to appear in court.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: carewemust
The whole reason to recuse is an articulateable bias or conflict. I'm no expert, but withholding the reason seems odd.