It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: tennisdawg
How does it make sense to release another type of Corona virus to "calm fears".
When catching that second virus, with an already compromised immune system from catching covid19, could be exponentially fatal and would most certainly drive the numbers up??
No offense but, I'm not buying it, your story is a great yarn, but I'm a bit skeptical
originally posted by: checkmeout
Don't mean to be a dumbass but 220 cases. 7 deaths. That's pretty high no?
originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: celltypespecific
The CDC must really think the American people are stupid.... How the hell can there only be 14 US cases...? WTF!!!
They are stupid, look at how they got away with 9/11. WeChat and twitter is in censorship mode. Even on this thread look how much heat comes down when uncomfortable issues are brought up. Distractions, diversions and confusion is a well tried and tested tacits of information warfare.
originally posted by: checkmeout
BNO reporting another Italy death. 62 yr old female. Not sure of comorbidities. Don't mean to be a dumbass but 220 cases. 7 deaths. That's pretty high no?
originally posted by: fleabit
I can't believe for a moment the U.S. has nailed this down so there is literally no spread of the virus. How realistic is that? Not very. No other infected passengers in flights from China, or from connecting flights? Or from many other regions now infected? Like.. ZERO? Hmm...
The only nugget I will ad for now is related to the CFR. I have posted for weeks now that the CFR was 15% on the documents I saw at the beginning. I now have reason to believe that this is a very conservative number.
Numbers coming out of other countries don't support that idea. While nebulous in China, other countries reporting in are right around that 2% range, maybe 2.5%. You can't count on #s from China or from Iran, either. They are purposely misreporting. SK, Japan, Thailand, the U.S., Singapore, Hong Kong.. and more. All right around 1.5% to 2.5%.
If the U.S. has to send in intelligence agents to try and get the truth from China, why do you think some random #s you are getting are correct? None of the deaths reported in other countries are supporting anything even at 3%.. let alone a "conservative" 15% number.
Some substantiated proof would be helpful.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
originally posted by: checkmeout
BNO reporting another Italy death. 62 yr old female. Not sure of comorbidities. Don't mean to be a dumbass but 220 cases. 7 deaths. That's pretty high no?
3.1% Mortality Rate which is exactly as predicted.
Moving forward lets not pay attention to china numbers.
Garbage in....Garbage out
China, Iran, Korea..........................................>>>>>> bio W..............could be just that! And the virus is nothing worse than flu.
originally posted by: tennisdawg
originally posted by: TheAMEDDDoc
a reply to: tennisdawg
If that were the case it would be weapons grade or synthetic and we’re getting Wuhan in our BSL3 labs for some research studies at a research university. They wouldn’t clear it for that type of work if it were BSL4 or worse, this virus has been mapped so often already it’s just not possible to move through hosts like that unless it underwent significant mutation or recombination.
You are by far one of the best sources of knowledge on this thread. I am only passing along the information I am given. I trust your opinion on the medical side of this, but I am not sure that your BSL3 lab is being given the exact virus that we have seen in Wuhan and Iran. A lot of the misinformation is centered around a smokescreen virus (much milder) released by China itself to cover up/confuse the actual bioweapon that was released in Wuhan. There is a significant difference between Wuhan and outside of Wuhan. Iran has been targeted by a bioweapon as well. All other areas of mild coronavirus are exactly that. A mild coronavirus released by China on purpose to calm the populace and re-gain control of the situation. This is why so many different labs, doctors, countries, etc. have differing opinions on the virus.
China tried to keep the lid on it be locking down Wuhan early, then releasing a normal coronavirus in the same area, and surrounding communities. They did not release the bioweapon, but knew that they had stolen it from the USA. At first, they did believe this was an accident from their own lab. Within days, they were aware that it was released near their lab intentionally. Now, here we are with the same deep state players trying to throw gas on the fire in Iran.
I do not mean to propel doom porn nor panic. But any information we might get that helps us fight an unknown is probably well worth the risk in believing, as these are different, and trying times.
originally posted by: checkmeout
BNO reporting another Italy death. 62 yr old female. Not sure of comorbidities. Don't mean to be a dumbass but 220 cases. 7 deaths. That's pretty high no?
originally posted by: violet
Anyone else notice you can no longer see this site? Asks to sign in
Coronavirus Maos & Stats
originally posted by: violet
Anyone else notice you can no longer see this site? Asks to sign in
Coronavirus Maos & Stats
originally posted by: violet
Anyone else notice you can no longer see this site? Asks to sign in
Coronavirus Maos & Stats
originally posted by: tennisdawg
A lot of the misinformation is centered around a smokescreen virus (much milder) released by China itself to cover up/confuse the actual bioweapon that was released in Wuhan.
There is a significant difference between Wuhan and outside of Wuhan.
originally posted by: fleabit
I do not mean to propel doom porn nor panic. But any information we might get that helps us fight an unknown is probably well worth the risk in believing, as these are different, and trying times.
It would be foolish and could in fact be dangerous to believe stories like that without further proof. Personally I'm not buying into the stories.. nor that that many sources would provide that much information, it makes no sense at all. Each to their own, but I'd recommend during times of crisis, don't blindly believe everything you read and hear. Not from unverified sources.. but also not from some verified sources - i.e. governments of certain countries.
A fatality rate of 1.5 to 3% (on the high side) seems about average for this, so far, with many of those being older, or with existing medical issues.