-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -23-

Long night but all tweets now updated into this SPREADSHEET UPDATE:

Q V16.62 20200208 to 3842 incl. DECODE tools


Notes
1) Just under 1400 tweets added for Dec 23rd 2019 to Feb 7th 2020 from Trumptwitterarchive.com,
2) All automated decodes done including Qclock search,
3) A dozen or so MARKERS where a tweet has been 0, 1, 10 or 15 mins after a Q post (or vice versa)... one is on the latest post Q3842 see (following post)!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

DECODE ID 23RSH200208001D

Q3842 was followed by a POTUS tweet 5 minutes later:

This is a 5 min MARKER - Important in relation to past week before the POTUS tweet.


Q3842

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 82fedb No.8062147 📁
Feb 7 2020 12:29:42 (EST) NEW
Why is China/Qatar donating vast sums of money to our education institutions?
finance.yahoo.com...📁
>>>>>
www.justice.gov...📁
Is it really so hard to believe [F] actors are able to bribe those in key positions within the US to betray their Country?
Q

POTUS Retweet at Feb 7, 2020 12:34:17 PM:

RT @RepThomasMassie: I’d fire him. I listened to his testimony in the SCIF. He’s a leaker, not a whistleblower. Vindman was upset that @rea…

Note that:
a) The tweet timestamp of 12:34:17 = 1, 2, 3, 4 Q,
b) Q3842 sums to 17 = Q.

Conclusion: Look out for proof that Vindman received payments from [F] Actors!

Need zeds now but note that:

POTUS tweet storm from 07:13:16 to 07:39:23 of 29 tweets...

If there are no more in next hour or so then I'd interpret that as 29 points to Sunday Feb 9th (Oscars?).

Alex the Lesser is on a fast track to the end. Military career now stalled. It’s hard for me to see how he can keep his clearance after we now know he leaked information.

An O5 in the DoD with no or minimal security clearances ends up running transportation at Fort Richardson.

Alex the Leaker is closer to civilian life than Full Colonel.

How are we supposed to gather anything form this thread? Its way too big

I wanted to respond to a thread that was recently locked ,but now I cant find it

a reply to: Bloodworth

Just tell us what’s on your mind. Most folks will recall what post you are referring to.

originally posted by: Bloodworth
How are we supposed to gather anything form this thread? Its way too big

I wanted to respond to a thread that was recently locked ,but now I cant find it

On the first page of each part of the thread Dashen has put links to previous parts so that you can look back easier.

There are also downloads of archive near the start on each part that can be more easily searched through once downloaded.

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
a reply to: Bloodworth

Just tell us what’s on your mind. Most folks will recall what post you are referring to.

Thankyou. I wanted to respond to the silent killer thread..
It was similar to a think tank I've had experience with.
The questions proposed were , if you were an enemy of the u.s. and understood you could not attack with traditional weapons and armies.

What would be some ways enemies could weaken or even take over the u.s..

And we were told to llst every thing, no matter how crazy.

Some reasons were to plant a mole in a position of power to control the underlyings.

Others were real radical like chemical warfare where you could somehow introduce a chemical to citzens that would make men more feminine and females more masculine.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi

originally posted by: Bloodworth
How are we supposed to gather anything form this thread? Its way too big

I wanted to respond to a thread that was recently locked ,but now I cant find it

On the first page of each part of the thread Dashen has put links to previous parts so that you can look back easier.

There are also downloads of archive near the start on each part that can be more easily searched through once downloaded.

Thanks for the tip

a reply to: Bloodworth

The most recent recent think tank posts were Januari 3rd in this thread.
And in October last year could one of these be what you are referring to? 3rd & 5th

a reply to: imthegoat

en.wikipedia.org...

This is the bill in question.

Read it and make up your own minds.

a reply to: Bloodworth

The 3 separate co-equal branches are built in safety features that would truly require the People to truly want to abandon the Constitution. That’s why Left wants open borders; the long con.

Mix in;

Legislative has 2 houses
Judicial has 9 judges with lifetime appts to negate one Admin overloading in one term.
Executive being the only nationally elected position

My fears from outside the US;
- cyber on infrastructure (power/comms/GPS)
- terror attacks on soft targets

My fears from within;
- they stopped dead in their tracks with POTUS Trump
- they return when I think of the year 1 A.T.
- will the GOP use the model gifted to them from Trump to carry on after he’s out of office?

Honestly, if the Left would work with POTUS there could be so much to gain for their interests as well.

Why would they not? Why jeopardize decades and centuries of control/influence just because of one man who, at the most, is around for 8 short years. Why? What’s hidden that they are so frightened will be exposed by an outlier like Trump?

- MSM now branded and proven to be Fake News for generations to come.
- Dems now branded and proven to be a socialist party
- GOP now behaving and aggressive like Trump

Why risk all of that? Over one man. Why?

Enter Q.

FYI: From Last Night.

Rep. Steve Scalise said that after seeing classified information, he believes that some people should be in jail after U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Russia inquiry concludes.

“People ought to go to jail,” the Louisiana Republican said to Sean Hannity after explaining there are still “dirty cops” in Washington undermining the president’s agenda.

“I have seen some classified information I can't go into — but, I can say this: Hopefully, Durham names names. I think the attorney general is waiting to see what comes out of that. And then, hopefully, they go after those people and put them in jail.”

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

a reply to: carewemust

I’m just hoping they get arrested & charged. If they plea out or acquitted at trial; fine. Make them defend their criminal activity. Not just skate.

If I hear “Durham Report” again, I’ll scream. Now, a post action “report” summarizing the investigation and evidence that led to the arrests of; X, Y, Z... I’m cool with that.

There’s no fewer than a dozen “known” coup conspirators. Probably that same # of names we haven’t even heard of.

Someone has to go to jail. Why? Simply look at the hoax impeachment. The fact that even happened tells me the Dems are trying to smokescreen and create the future narrative of “political revenge” when their side gets Durham’d. They don’t risk all they have for no reason. It’s preemptive defense by deflection.

Past proves future. Future proves past. Waiting until after election will deflate that strategy significantly.

a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

They are panicking for a reason, though. Even Andrew Weisman, the head of the former Bob Mueller witch-hunt, is making the rounds on liberal TV. He's admitting that Trump didn't "take the bait" designed to entrap him.

thegreggjarrett.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

They are panicking for a reason, though. Even Andrew Weisman, the head of the former Bob Mueller witch-hunt, is making the rounds on liberal TV. He's admitting that Trump didn't "take the bait" designed to entrap him.

thegreggjarrett.com...

They think because Trump is not well-spoken that he must be stupid.

Why does your wiki link skip the entire thing and start you off at the "criticism' section at the bottom of the page?
reply to: scraedtosleep

@Time4u2know



Q3837 partial...

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 7d6cbf No.8074053 📁
Feb 8 2020 12:32:11 (EST) NEW
www.youtube.com...📁
“For every item that carries the darkness of humanity there's one that holds the light. And that light is worth believing in. Not just in others, but in yourself as well.” ― C.M. Rayne
Trust and believe in yourself.
The Silent War Continues….
Q (#3843)


Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: a3cb43 No.8074542 📁
Feb 8 2020 13:06:14 (EST) NEW
twitter.com...📁
Q (#3844)



Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 0a1aa0 No.8074677 📁
Feb 8 2020 13:16:02 (EST) NEW
EQG6SXlVUAAUegM.jpg
( qanon.pub... )
⬇
www.justice.gov...📁
Q (#3845)


Cheers

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: imthegoat

en.wikipedia.org...

This is the bill in question.

Read it and make up your own minds.

I've heard the bill wasnt very good to begin with, and some of it is already covered in other bills. But my question is why try to repeal it when it can just be amended?

ETA: My conclusion is that they're crying about the bill being an inconvenience to sex workers.


ETA (again): They want more rights for illegal workers. Sounds familiar.