It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: purplemer
Have you heard of Adam's Calendar ?
It is said that it faces Orion's Belt, and may be the most ancient megalithic site found so far.
Although these claims are disputed by some folks with fancy letters after their names.
Ancient Origins: Adam's Calendar.
Orion's belt isn't a fixed point in the sky (unlike the polar stars.) It rises and moves across the sky and sets, and during part of the year it's not visible. In addition, there are other stars in that part of the sky... so as Orion rises higher and higher (with each successive evening), other stars show up in the same position on the horizon.
So it can't "face Orion's belt."
(additionally, the stones were set into place recently. They were discovered lying at all kinds of angles but the people who believe it's ancient set them back up (and may have "moved them back into place.")
originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: Astronomer62
You have built one helluva case over the past year here on ATS! How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?
originally posted by: Nothin
Hi Byrd.
Yeah: my mistake, as my post should have said: indicates the point where Sirius, and Orion's belt rise, on specific dates of the year, such an equinox, or solstice.
But if the stones were moved, did some stay where they were, or were they were all moved ?
Apparently Stonehenge was rebuilt as well.
Silly Humans...
Perhaps there are reasons why most scholars are not interested in Adam's Calendar.
I can categorically say that I have seen nothing that might convince me that Adam's Calendar was constructed beyond the currently held time-frame of megalithic construction, which began with Gobekli Tepe and the other Pre-Pottery Neolithic structures of SE Turkey and North Syria c. 10,000-9000 BC. Moreover, there is no argument that might be used to argue that any proposed alignment towards the belt stars of Orion only makes sense if the site was constructed 75,000 years ago. No calculations can be used to prove such an idea, not precession (a 26,000 year cycle), obliquity of the ecliptic (a 41,000 year cycle), or even much longer Milankovitch cycles, which only affect climate and not the earth's astronomical position against the local horizon.
andrewcollins.com...
The mistake here is in what is being defined as coincidence.
a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection.
originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: TzarChasm
The mistake here is in what is being defined as coincidence.
First, we must understand what a 'coincidence' is before we can define *what*, in Astro's research, appears to 'coincide'.
How does the Oxford dictionary define the word, 'coincidence'?
a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection.
You may be partially correct. While there may not be a "causal connection" between Sirius and Earthling "events and circumstances", yet there does appear to be "a remarkable concurrence" between them, as Astro has labouriously proven beyond a shadow of any doubt.
Something to ponder, deeply.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Astronomer62
This all just evidence that people are superstitious, that they engineer coincidence in an effort to produce the illusion of fate and cosmic influence. We give names to the stars, they do not name us. We give life to gods, they do not give us life. Vicarious spirituality is the mirror in which we find identity because the one we have now is lonely and horrifying. The psychology of astronomy is painfully transparent but you choose to believe numbers are alive and want us to acknowledge them, not the other way around. That is your right.
originally posted by: Astronomer62
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Astronomer62
This all just evidence that people are superstitious, that they engineer coincidence in an effort to produce the illusion of fate and cosmic influence. We give names to the stars, they do not name us. We give life to gods, they do not give us life. Vicarious spirituality is the mirror in which we find identity because the one we have now is lonely and horrifying. The psychology of astronomy is painfully transparent but you choose to believe numbers are alive and want us to acknowledge them, not the other way around. That is your right.
Hi TzarChasm,
Please don't miss-quote me,
I have always said what i find are beliefs, as CanadianMason will tell you, i have never said anything other as an archaeoastronomer.
What i have said is "This is enough for conspiracy as many heads of state follow this process of belief in hermeticism, which voters are unaware of, in general aligning a date or building doesn't effect us, but what are the ethics of this religion, that controls us?
All this is secret society beliefs, and i have never said this is what effected the outcome, but by the nature of the beliefs in war it has influenced history, the beliefs are there in 9/11, that go back to 1922, and the process of where we are today is influenced by these beliefs, not the stars.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
In Purplemer's favour i have to say i was shaken by the amount of Presidents of the United States had a connection to either Sirius or Alnilam by birth or death at location, but to have a thesis, i would have to go through every country of the world, which slowly i'm doing, which i will show in a long time from now, the next will be Prime Ministers of the UK.
I'm very carefull what i say, and i have always said it is the beliefs, not the stars that influence history:-
www.abovetopsecret.com...
people are looking at the stars and arranging their calendar and architecture accordingly
originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: TzarChasm
Hello, TC.
We agree on this:
people are looking at the stars and arranging their calendar and architecture accordingly
My question is, why, WTF?
Who are these people, and what do they get out of it?
If Astro is correct, these people are part of some super secret global cabal of hermeticists who hold the reigns of Power, and utilize the stars to arrange their affairs here on Earth.
It sounds absurd but, here we are, face-to-face with Astro's findings, which are undeniably mind-altering.
While we may not share *their* belief in the efficacy of the stars, those beliefs surely have affected our destiny.
St. Milburga Lodge is a traditional masonic lodge formally from Ironbridge now meeting at Wellington, Shropshire.
Link (You'll also find some interesting info on the origin and meaning of the Masonic beehive symbol at the link.)
The beehive is a very old Masonic symbol that is still used in many countries, but in England and Wales it was dropped after the Union of 1813. It can still be seen however in some older pre-Union lodges, for example it is displayed as a symbol on the 3rd Degree Tracing Board of the Royal Cumberland Lodge No.41 in Bath, but to all purposes it has been lost as a symbol under the United Grand Lodge of England.
(More info at Link
The Three Graces can be traced to ancient Greek religion where they were goddesses of fertility; the name Graces refers to the �pleasing� or �charming� appearance of a fertile field or garden. The number of the Graces would vary in different legends, but there usually were three of them, namely: Aglaia, meaning brightness; Euphrosyne, meaning joyfulness; and Thilia, meaning bloom. They were said at various times to be the daughters of Zeus and Hera or of Helios and Aegle.
In works of art the Three Graces were, in early times, depicted being draped with cloth, and later as nude female figures. In Freemasonry the Three Graces; Faith, Hope, and Charity, are depicted in art wearing fine clothing.