It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
marg says:
Marg, Mr. Horacid and Mr. Nygdan and Mr. Intrepid and I are having a grownup conversation here.
Originally posted by jrod
I dont see any harm in offering a diverse world religion class. At the very least it will give the students something to research and write about and I do believe that writing is one of the weaknesses facing college freshmen.
Arianna Huffington: "The Founding Fathers were spiritual people and the separation of church and state has been over-interpreted and misinterpreted."
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who gave us the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, were not even remotely spiritual as she uses that word. They were Deists and Humanists, as they often clearly stated in their own words.
James Madison: "Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together. A just government, instituted to perpetuate liberty, DOES NOT NEED THE CLERGY (or the church)." And again: "These are the fruits of the legal establishment known as Christianity: pride and indolence in the clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, and in both clergy and laity, superstition, bigotry and persecution."
Arianna Huffington: "We need to welcome God back into our public schools."
1. Her brand of "God," no doubt. Have you ever noticed that it is only the Bible "God" they want back in the schools? Certainly not the unknown Mystery of Buddhism, Taoism, Judaism, Native Americans, Classical Humanism and all the other dozens of intelligent concepts of that cosmic Mystery we call "God."
Originally posted by Odd
the suggestion is that we give religious parents the option of having their schools incorporate elements of the faith. note the "option" bit. you would still bel free to send your children to a secular school if you do not support any particular religion.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Originally posted by intrepid
What about the rest of that post Doc, you know, the part you didn't quote?
Keep missing that for some reason.
One, no seperation ask and answered
Two funding ask and answered
Three ask and answered.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by DrHoracid
The absence of religion in the schools I pay for is a violation of "MY" right of religion. "The congress shall make no law respecting religion"
Removing prayer from the schools is a 'state" support of religion.
Well, if you put it that way, I guess we'll just put everybody's rights on the shelf so you can have yours.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Again the 'tryany" of the minority is ruining "my" america. The "good" of the one does no outweight the "rights" of the many.
What's that I'm smelling here Doc? Could it be hypocrisy?
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
We already did this discussion a page back, kid.
Originally posted by James the Lesser
Which part Kidfinger?
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Kid it is, Kid.
I guess that makes us both "capitalists" LOL!
Originally posted by DrHoracid
If a child can't bow their head and give thanks at lunch thats "undone". If the ten commandments can't be posted as a reference of how society should act, that's "undone". The schools have them more hours per day than the parents.
Don't take my taxes at "gunpoint" then tell "me" how to teach my child anything.
Originally posted by Aether
Originally posted by DrHoracid
If a child can't bow their head and give thanks at lunch thats "undone". If the ten commandments can't be posted as a reference of how society should act, that's "undone". The schools have them more hours per day than the parents.
Don't take my taxes at "gunpoint" then tell "me" how to teach my child anything.
Practicing someone's cultural habits is NOT what a public school is for.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Again the 'tryany" of the minority is ruining "my" america. The "good" of the one does no outweight the "rights" of the many.
This make no sense at all. First off, it's not "your" America, it belongs to everyone. I see no ones rights being violated by this practice.
BTW, if you polled people, you would find that you are the minority on this issue.