It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: ketsuko
Yes I agree, I was a little turned off by his thoughts on homosexuality.
There clearly needs to be more research into this!
Just in response to this good men taking action , when the # are the rest of the world going to openly condemn India and all the #ty creepy wee #s who are into rape gangs and openly post rape threats on FB.
When are we going to openly condemn the treatment of women by specific religions. I just cant stomach that # ... [snip]...What men allow their sons, or their friends to openly post rape threats on public social media channels . Who are these scum bags
What are the facts? Can one have a different biological sex than one’s gender? It is well documented that every cell in the human body is either male or female except mature red blood cells, which are enucleated: before use, they expel their nucleus that contains their chromosomes which includes the X and Y chromosomes. This gives the erythrocytes more room to transport oxygen. All other cells have either a male set (X and Y chromosomes) or a female set (two X’s, one which is silenced). X-inactivation involves being packaged to be transcriptionally inactive in a structure called heterochromatin.
As nearly all healthy female mammals have two X chromosomes, X-inactivation prevents them from having twice as many X chromosome gene products as males, who only possess a single copy of the X chromosome. The silencing is said to achieve dosage compensation. X-inactivation is also called lyonization after Mary Lyon, who discovered it. Furthermore, a process called imprinting turns off thousands of genes off epigenetically in males and a different thousand in females, producing many thousands of genetic differences between males and females. Out of many thousands of experiments so far completed, no researcher has ever found a single trait that is identical in both males and females. Females have a higher average in some traits, males in others. In sum, the science is clear, biological males and females are facts of life. Transgenderism is a psychological problem, not a problem with a male stuck in a female body.
Many examples exist about how the left ignores science to support their ideology. Examples include not just the transgender issue but also the abortion and global warming movements. The peer reviewed medical literature with large samples and good research methodology on this issue is very clear.
originally posted by: sapien82
This article was more interesting
Does transgenderism have an evolitionary benefit
originally posted by: Skid Mark
a reply to: Boadicea
My red line is being expected to entertain their delusions and their lack of understanding of basic biology. My red line is that this is even being considered normal and not a disorder.
MercatorNet: From an evolutionary standpoint, children raised by same-sex couples are not in the mainstream. How could they be affected? Is there a difference between children conceived by biological parents and children who are adopted?
U. Kutschera: As described in my book, a biological mother and a biological father are both very important for a healthy development of the baby and child (1). To deny a child its natural mother or father is always a very problematic social experiment. Numerous studies have shown that stepfathers (or stepmothers) kill children under five up to 100 times more often than biological parents do. This “Cinderella-effect” always poses a danger when genetically unrelated adults raise children that are not their own (1, 2). There may be some same-sex couples who can manage all of these problems, but in general, such artificial (genetically unrelated) “families” are far from ideal. In many cases they are dangerous for the adopted children, as the literature shows (1, 3).
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: Boadicea
another thing that is a red line , the firing of medical professionals and university professors for giving their expert opinion and or the facts on biology when asked , labelled as bigots and fired under pressure from activists and political correctness
originally posted by: MetalChickAmy
I am a lesbian who used to be active in the scene, and as a result have come into contact with numerous trans people, male and female. Of those I have known, and still do, the vast majority of them are normal people who just want to live their lives in peace.... Sadly, it is the minority that are the most vocal. Just like how feminism was ruined by feminazis going too far...
My red line really is forcing children down the path just because they exhibit behaviour is not typical of their physical gender. It happens too much now, and the process needs to be a lot more intensive in ways of psychological assessments before any medication is given out. It often turns out to be a phase that is grown out of, and if a child is pushed into transitioning and it was just a phase, that can cause irreversible damage to them as a person.
Of course, what a capable, responsible adult does with their life is entirely up to them, and none of us have any right to get involved in their lives without their consent.