Transgender Man....gives birth to baby

a reply to: RowanBean

Neither are anorexics. In fact, they're even less so when you consider they at least don't demand everyone else also think that they're fat and vocalize as much. Never heard of an anorexic saying someone who said "you're not fat" is a bigot.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: RowanBean

Neither are anorexics.

Wrong. They hurt their families.

I love the quote below the video.

'Pregnancy is not a gendered thing'.

I wish these DNA deniers would give it a break.

a reply to: SKEPTEK

Who is denying DNA?

originally posted by: RowanBean

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: RowanBean

Neither are anorexics.

Wrong. They hurt their families.

Hmm. .. yet family members who are hurt by a loved one's choice to change genders is a "bigot" and gets partly blamed for the high suicide rates you mentioned earlier.

Wow, the hypocrisy proves my point.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: RowanBean

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: RowanBean

Neither are anorexics.

Wrong. They hurt their families.

Hmm. .. yet family members who are hurt by a loved one's choice to change genders is a "bigot" and gets partly blamed for the high suicide rates you mentioned earlier.

Wow, the hypocrisy proves my point.

No hypocrisy. Why would transgenderism hurt families? They aren't hurting themselves like anorexics do. If families and society would let transgender be, then there wouldn't be such a high suicide rate as you claimed.
You seem to think that being transgender directly cause depression and suicide. Do you remember that gay people had high suicide rate?


BTW you claimed that transgenderism is a choice. You need to back that claim up.

a reply to: lakenheath24

So what do you think the United Kingdom and U.S went around sterilizing all the undesirables and down syndrome people by force?

They had laws behind them and what they perceived as right on there side, and they did more than just sterilization!

Was not just Germany that excelled in such diabolical social engineering, that's for sure.

a reply to: andy06shake

It's like something out of the movie Gattaca.

a reply to: RowanBean

Don't you think that daddy becoming mommy or vice-versa could hurt a family?

Christ, your family must be rather more understanding than most mate.

Bit of a difference between being or becoming gay and a body dysmorphic disorder which will also turn everything you and everyone else around you believe to be the norm on it's head.

By the way, choosing to have elective surgery to have your genitalia turned inside out is indeed a choice!

Nobody is going to force you into such a procedure without your consent unless you are a child whose parents decide to entertain and/or encourage such nonsense most lightly down to the fact that they are dissatisfied with there child's born sex.

Just down the paperwork and release forms applicable before such procedure could be performed indicates that this is a choice does it not?

a reply to: andy06shake

Some children have two daddies or mommies and they turned out just fine.

Yes having elective surgery is a choice. That isn't the issue.

Why do you believe that parents entertain and/or encourage transgenderism in transgender children? In fact it's usually quite the opposite.

a reply to: RowanBean

"Why do you believe that parents entertain and/or encourage transgenderism in transgender children? In fact it's usually quite the opposite."

Because the world has gone mental and panders to politically correct mumbo-jumbo at the drop of a hat.

And it's not to ensure your freedom and security, it's for the political correct brownie points.

Such is the world of our own creation I'm afraid.

a reply to: andy06shake

That's your opinion that doesn't reflect reality. Parents of transgender children generally refuse to accept it. In fact they discourage such thing. When it persists, they take them to counselors.

a reply to: RowanBean

Yes it is my opinion and one i imagine quite a few people agree with but at the end of the day transgenderism is the least of our problems.

Counselors are the new solicitors mate!

What happened to keeping one's own council or asking advice from family and friends???

All about monies with counselors because its an industry!

a reply to: lakenheath24

I know I’m wasting my time here but...

No one takes hormones at age 10. They may take hormone blockers to stall puberty. These drugs have been around a while, and have been given to children with disorders that cause early puberty (it’s not safe to start having mentrual cycles at age 7), with no permanent effects. So, these are not new drugs, and they have been given to kids before, for medical reasons.

There are no 3 year olds who are having sex reassignment surgery. There are no 3 year olds who are taking hormones. There are no 3 year olds who are taking hormone blockers (unless they have some disorder that is causing puberty to start at age 3).

Conform.

Conform.

Conform.

originally posted by: Ghostsinthefog
Conform.

Yes sir.

a reply to: kaylaluv

I concur, you wasted your time. But mainly because you did not read the links, and you conflated two separate statements. Please re-read my post and try again so you won't waste your time.

originally posted by: lakenheath24
Well this article says 800 kids....some as young as 10 are taking hormones to stop puberty while they decide what they want you be.

No, the article does not say 10 year olds are taking hormones, because they are not taking hormones.

In Australia....kids as young a 3 are being considered for reassignment...and the growth has been "exponential".

“Reassignment” typically means hormones or surgery. No 3 year olds are being considered for reassignment. Allowing a 3 year old girl to cut her hair short and wear jeans and T-shirts is not “reassignment”. Allowing a 3 year old boy to grow his hair and wear a skirt is not “reassignment”. That’s just allowing them to express themselves freely without forcing any gender stereotypes on them.