It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yes it would indeed be threatened if there was no desire for babies.
Fact is we would have 70-100 years tops.
And 100 year olds make for poor slaves.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Gryphon66
I'm not going anywhere with it simply pointing out the requirement for the next generation.
People have a shelf life, that's just a fact.
I dont think gender identity will be an issue all the same short of 90% of our respective populations adopting said issue. LoL
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
We all know trans-whatevers will be the first to go if/when civilization breaks down. Their way of life serves no purpose in nature.
originally posted by: Peacetime
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
We all know trans-whatevers will be the first to go if/when civilization breaks down. Their way of life serves no purpose in nature.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
originally posted by: RowanBean
a reply to: Lucius Driftwood
Anorexia is dangerous and unhealthy and transgenderism isn't.
Terrible comparison.
it just so happens the anorexia crowd doesn't have the organized political clout to force science to abdicate itself to pander to them.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: RowanBean
Individual's choices and decisions are their choices and decisions, ya? Long as they're doing no harm to another party...