F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen

The witch hunt seems to be turning up a lot of witches.

For the judge to have signed off on the warrant/raid, then the evidence submitted must have been overwhelming

a reply to: BlueAjah

Certainly.. you must be on the inside. Or it could mean they are investigating if this hush money was funded through campaign dollars.. which is illegal. Hmm I’ll go with b.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Certainly.. you must be on the inside. Or it could mean they are investigating if this hush money was funded through campaign dollars.. which is illegal. Hmm I’ll go with b.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Not even close to Muellers assigned purpose.

This is exactly what Scalia warned about with special prosecutors.

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: IAMTAT

If this has anything to do with Mueller, time to fire his ass. This is so far outside the scope of "Russia collusion" debunked conspiracy theory it isn't even funny.

The funny thing... collusion isn't even a crime on the books! All this money wasted to try to remove a duly elected President from office. There's a word for that... Coup i think!

Py

originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: TinfoilTP

They're saying this is because of stormy Daniel's which means they're using her story as a front to find something anything about Russia and bring down the president.

The interesting thing about that is that, while charges can stem from things found during a warrant raid for something else (let's say, stuff surrounding Stormy Daniels but they find evidence of "collusion" [not itself a crime] with Russia), that can be used to pursue charges pertaining to Russian collusion, but it does open up ammunition from the defense.

In that regard, it's like I noted earlier, this could be a backhanded way for both Mueller and the FBI to get back at Trump, using a rather pointless case of adultery from a time when he was not POTUS to find evidence of other illegal happenings.

It's a pretty crappy way to use the legal system if this ends up being the case, and I would be highly disgusted with the actions if this is what it ends up being.

a reply to: neo96

But Trump and the Clintons are SOOOO different, right?



Birds of a feather flock together.

Cohen's secretary must have bought donuts at the wrong store.

🤣👋🧐

originally posted by: muse7
For the judge to have signed off on the warrant/raid, then the evidence submitted must have been overwhelming

Considering the false info presented to FISA court judges started this I wouldnt make that claim without seeing the actual affidavit / application first.

Also Mueller has a history of going after Attorneys and people on his staff have a history of ethical breeches resulting in overturned convictions and censure of the prosecutor.

a reply to: pyguy

There's a word for that...

Yep.

Kleptocracy.

After the billions wasted over the course of a year.

That must be why Trump haters want taxes raised.

To replace what they've blown.

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: TinfoilTP

They're saying this is because of stormy Daniel's which means they're using her story as a front to find something anything about Russia and bring down the president.

The interesting thing about that is that, while charges can stem from things found during a warrant raid for something else (let's say, stuff surrounding Stormy Daniels but they find evidence of "collusion" [not itself a crime] with Russia), that can be used to pursue charges pertaining to Russian collusion, but it does open up ammunition from the defense.

In that regard, it's like I noted earlier, this could be a backhanded way for both Mueller and the FBI to get back at Trump, using a rather pointless case of adultery from a time when he was not POTUS to find evidence of other illegal happenings.

It's a pretty crappy way to use the legal system if this ends up being the case, and I would be highly disgusted with the actions if this is what it ends up being.

The whole stormy daniels mess stinks of Democrats. She didnt bother to say anything during the elections and then Trump got elected. She accepted the NDA and settlement. All of a sudden certain Democrats start banging the drums on stormy daniels and mad max from Ca is talking impeachment.

Sounds like collusion to me but on the left.

a reply to: JBurns

What happens if we have a real state of war?

Can anyone imagine the faces on the folks at the FBI when they are told to stop or face a military prison for interfering with a wartime president?

It could even be retroactive so as to curb any material that could aid enemy wartime propaganda.

a reply to: The GUT

It's front page on Deep State Breibart Deep State News Deep State too Deep State. Also on Deep State Fox Deep State News Deep State. The Deep State Gateway Deep State Pundit had their story ready and Deep State published at 3:22 PM. They even beat NYT! Can't get more Deep State than that. They even beat Chuck Deep State Ross at Daily Deep State Caller by almost an hour and they both beat WaPo who didn't publish until 4:56 PM.

Here's some article publication times in sequence:

The Gateway Pundit - 3:22 PM
New York Times - 3:54 PM
The Hill - 4:00 PM
Huffington Post - 4:10 PM
Daily Caller - 4:12 PM
ABC News - 4:19 PM
NBC News - 4:23 PM
WaPo - 4:56 PM
Fox News - 5:30 PM (front page article, may or may not be first)
CNN - updated at 5:35 PM, uncertain original pub time
CBS News - 5:36 PM (front page article, may or may not be first)

Seriously, even in your Twitter source's image of pub times from Google, which may or may not be accurate, they're not 6 minutes apart which means he's so unhinged he can apparently look at numbers and see alternate numbers.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

But Trump and the Clintons are SOOOO different, right?

They are.

Look no further than Clinton skating for HER corruption, and LEO was weaponized against the winner of the last election.

That's how far the United States of dysfunction has fallen.

No better than a third world banana republic.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Not even close to Muellers assigned purpose.

This is exactly what Scalia warned about with special prosecutors.

Mueller didn't raid Cohen's office. The warrant was obtained by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and executed by the NY branch of the FBI.

a reply to: xuenchen

Probably picked up Cronuts by mistake.

Mmmmmm.......soooo flaky.....

a reply to: neo96

Billions waster over the course of a year? At least we're not flying pallets of cash to Iran under the Trump presidency!

Face facts, or have them brought to you!

Py

a reply to: theantediluvian

So, the moral of the story is to read the Gateway Pundit instead of WaPo for breaking news?

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Xcathdra

Not even close to Muellers assigned purpose.

This is exactly what Scalia warned about with special prosecutors.

Mueller didn't raid Cohen's office. The warrant was obtained by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and executed by the NY branch of the FBI.

If you dont think the 2 are related then you are naive.