It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: carewemust
Maybe? I don't even know if that would disqualify anyone. I mean, maybe if one leg was really, really short to the point you can't run?
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: carewemust
Maybe? I don't even know if that would disqualify anyone. I mean, maybe if one leg was really, really short to the point you can't run?
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: carewemust
I know I'm just pointing out some logical failures of people who think the military is a place where we should be implementing politically motivated social changes
cluueeelleeesssssssss
the military is a place that should be and used to promote toxic masculinity to prepare men for war where many of them face certain death and disfigurement not a place for people to feel good
The military in the US has been ahead of the times with some social issues in the past. Not really unprecedented.
originally posted by: murphy22
a reply to: carewemust
That's not a factual/true figure. But I'll play your little game.
We'll use your "Time.com" 7 as a 100%...because that's the "quantifiable". (The 8, 9 and 10 are useless to the military) Take 30% of "the 7" and it equals what? Got the answer? Good! Then/now you're dealing in fact/Reality.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: carewemust
In bootcamp, definitely lusted over. Everyone was very horny in bootcamp. The stories I've heard...
originally posted by: Outlier13
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: toysforadults
I served and I don't care if a transgender person wants to serve for their country. Scratch that, I do care, anyone should be able to serve no matter what.
Such a typical emotion driven, unthoughtful response devoid completely of critical thought. So based on your logic of "no matter what" we should therefor allow anyone to serve simply because they want to regardless if:
- they are physically unfit to serve
- have a history of mental illness
- did not graduate from high school or have a GED
- are underage
- have physical disabilities that prevent them from performing basic tasks
- are illegally in the US
- claim allegiance to another country other than the US
- etc..
My examples are extreme and are intended to be. Most people (and I will give you the benefit of the doubt) would agree than anyone possessing any of the above attributes should not be allowed to serve.
My point is you should choose your words more carefully and pose a valid argument as to why you think transgender should be allowed to serve. Not just, "because you say so". That is not an argument.
- they are physically unfit to serve
- have a history of mental illness
- did not graduate from high school or have a GED
- are underage
- have physical disabilities that prevent them from performing basic tasks
- are illegally in the US
- claim allegiance to another country other than the US